Construction & Working Drawings - Discussion
-
Well, for construction documents you wouldn't start with an A4 printer anyway, would you? Yes, I do know what you mean however there are always acceptable workarounds (like "printing" into a pdf file or actually exporting pdf to be printed later).
-
I was one of those people who didn't care for Layout when it first came out, but lately I've found it very useful. In fact, recently I had a SU model presentation that was 4' long and Layout was the only program I had that could handle it. But I've never tried to create CDs with SU or Layout, as my CAD program is so much easier and efficient at that. I am able to import SU models directly into my CAD program to generate drawings - so, SU does aid in creating CDs.
Honestly, I'm somewhat mystified everytime this comes up (creating CDs with SU and Layout). Why would anyone want to use SU or Layout to create Construction Documents, when that is neither program's intended purpose? And, should Google add full CAD capabilities to SU, I doubt we would have an easy-to-use and affordable program any more. -
Hi Daniel,
What CADD program do you use to import SU models into for ConDocs?
Regards,
WB -
DataCAD 12. I import it and then have DataCAD generate 2D elevation drawings. It can take a few minutes, but still quicker than recreating them from scratch, and cleaner than importing a dwg file from SU.
I would be surprised if you couldn't do this with other CAD programs, as well. (anyone else care to chime in on that?)
-
Daniel, Currently, I design and build my models with a Cad application then Dxf them to SU for visualization and presentation. The original model is assembled from blocks that translate as SU components. All changes to blocks are via the Cad application, that are then individually Dxf's to SU (minimizes redo work to the block/component in SU). In my case, the elevations are complete before the model is ported.
Have you ever used SU's scenes to create 2d elevations (parallel projection, aligned view) 2 Dxf for use in your Cad program? What are your pro and cons on this? Thanks.
-
My workflow is slightly different. We start with a plan, either in CAD or sketched out, and then I usually do the model. I have in the past imported the CAD plan into SU, but I found there was too much clean-up (especially if the plan was drawn by others), so it's quicker to start modeling from scratch. The majority of my models are just the exterior, anyway. From the model, I create the CAD elevations.
I have in the past created orthogonal views and then exported dwg files, and then imported them into DataCAD, but I found there was always a lot of clean-up to do. Any line touched or crossed by another line would be broken. On a railing with vertical pickets, for instance, the line for the top rail would be broken at each picket, so I would have a series of short lines instead of one long line.
But with the latest version of DataCAD I can import the model directly into SU. It comes in as a wire frame. I set the view in DataCAD, tell it to perform a hidden line removal and to save the image in a separate layer, and then I have a 2D elevation without broken lines. All I have to do is change the colors of the lines to match our office standards. This is much quicker than drawing them from scratch or cleaning up a dwg file, and I much rather spend the time modeling with SU.
I can also export a DataCAD file as a SU model, but haven't found a use for that, yet (I suppose if I wanted to import a CAD plan or other drawing into SU, that is how I would do it, now). -
I got pretty excited with LO beta and tried to make it work, I struggled with it for many projects then stoped when my support tickets when unanswered. The release version is more stable but when I saw it still lacked dimensioning I just gave up on it. I would instantly embrace it for shop drawings and simple plans if it could dimension since I am still doing quite a bit of design in SU. For now it just has really limited use in my work world
. -
I've been using Layout for woodworking plans lately and although there are a few things I wish it had related to text handling, I think it works fine. I place dimensions in SketchUp and create callouts and other text in LO. One thing that I found is that I end up with dimensions at 6 pt. in SketchUp. They are almost impossible for me to read on my screen in SU but work out just fine in LO and in the exported PDF.
-
Dave, I am very interested in exploring the new possibilities in LayOut. You are right! Its best to accept what Layout does not offer and get on with what it does.
Mike
-
Mike, it could be that because I'm not familiar with other programs such as Illustrator that are designed for doing presentation documents and the like, I don't find the limitations of Layout to be all that limiting. I see a huge benefit in having the SketchUp model dynamically linked to the document. That has been a big bonus.
Last Novemeber I did a plan in SketchUp for a small cabinet or bedside table. The client chose to use Illustrator or something for the document. I created scenes in SU and sent the file. They exported JPGs for use in the document. There were several revisions to the model which I got into SketchUp but the scenes didn't get replaced in the document and proofing didn't catch the errors before it got out. The plan was finally updated yesterday.
Last week I delivered a workbench plan to the same client but I did the entire thing in Layout. Again, there were several rounds of revisions to model but they were all incorporated in the PDF this time. If there are any erors, at least there's consistency between the model and the plan. Both of them are to be offered for sale as a package by the client.
-
@dave r said:
I've been using Layout for woodworking plans lately and although there are a few things I wish it had related to text handling, I think it works fine. I place dimensions in SketchUp and create callouts and other text in LO. One thing that I found is that I end up with dimensions at 6 pt. in SketchUp. They are almost impossible for me to read on my screen in SU but work out just fine in LO and in the exported PDF.
Dave,
Great point about the font, I have found that setting the font to inches is even more predictable/consistent.
I recently did kitchen cabinetry & vanity elevations this way @ 1/2" = 1'.
My SU dimension font was set to 3"....I exported out of layout to .pdf.....looked great.C
-
Hi everyone
As an answer to WBARCH wish
Being retired and doing woodworking as a hobby here is an example of what I obtain using Sketchup and Layout and exporting to PDF
http://cid-ef5ebd0cbc32b77f.skydrive.live.com/self.aspx/Plans%20SU%20format%20PDF/Table%20refectoire.pdfPlease note that I am not an expert of Sketchup neither of Layout
-
Hi Bert,
I couldn't seem to get your PDF file to download so I can see it. Any chance you could just do image exports from the Layout pages and post those as attachements?
Thank you.
Dave
-
Bert,
I managed to open your link to the pdf file, (you have to click the download button at the top left). It looks good Bert, you satisfactorily achieved showing all aspects of the table. It conveys all the pertinent info, it's good enough to build from.Best,
-
Dave R once you get to the page click on the link "Telecharger" The file name is: Table refectoire
-
I tried that but it wouldn't load. I'll try again though.
-
All,
OP asked for any/all...so here ya go.Attached is work in progress.....so please limit crits to dimensioning etc as they seem to be the focus of OP query.
FYI....am aware of Cabinet alingment issues.
Best
C
-
Bert, Charlie -
These are great, thanks for sharing them for us to see.
Mike, I agree - I think Layout needs a second look as well.
My own thoughts are that Layout and Sketchup together are very very close to being capable of acting as a Parametric/BIM solution for everything from shop drawings to construction documents for small to medium size buildings.Does anyone have any example construction drawings of buildings done in Layout they would like to share? Hopefully at some point Google will want to add a "Gallery" section for layout drawings so we can see this sort of thing. Similar to what Chief Architect software does at their site (see "Plan Sets")
-WB
-
@wbarch said:
My own thoughts are that Layout and Sketchup together are very very close to being capable of acting as a Parametric/BIM solution for everything from shop drawings to construction documents for small to medium size buildings.
Can I say that I totally agree with you?
Sketchup needs only to improve its 2d drafting capabilities. I don't know how. Maybe just powering the existing tools (arcs and circles first of all). I just wish that with the Tape Measure tool would be possible to get construction geometry (a real circle, not one composed by segments) also from circles and arcs. And all snapping and inferencing tecniques with these construction elements to be possible (such as circle tang from 3 elements, circle tang from 2 element and given radious, and so on). So that the drawing of certain curvy geometry become finally possible and accurate (now it's rather impossible to do some of them). Would be great if sketchup could paint vectorial editable hatches on faces with the Paint Bucket tool. And, finally, we strongly need the Dimension and Text tools to be developed further on. We need more controls over the position and alignement of the Text Tool and over the arrows, the extension line, the text position and the dimension line of the Dimension Tool. That's all!Here I attached a small project completly done with sketchup+layout.
The possibilities of both apps combine togheter have grown consistently with version 7
-
All,
RE: Position and Alignment for dimensions.Tip:Temporary use of a section cut for dimension alignment.
Place a section cut [attached example has cut @ center of cupola]& begin dimensioning.
It is very important that the inference starts X @ intersection of section plane for this to work properly
As long as the inference starts @ the intersection, the dimensions will align nicely.
There are some exceptions, but I find this works quite well.Apologies if this is "known", but I thought apropriate to include in this thread.
Best,
C
Advertisement