sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    โ„น๏ธ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    [REQ] - SANDBOX EXTENTIONS (A request to all the rubie GODS)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Plugins
    19 Posts 12 Posters 2.5k Views 12 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S Offline
      silver_shadow
      last edited by

      yea....lets cheer those on who is the gods of plugins and want to shape our models.
      Like biebel said, it would be awesome for landscaping...and more fun to make i think lol

      my christmas list is getting serious long hee hee ๐Ÿ˜Ž

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C Offline
        chango70
        last edited by

        Awesome idea! ๐Ÿ˜

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R Offline
          remus
          last edited by

          mmmmmm, sculpting tools drool

          http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • StinkieS Offline
            Stinkie
            last edited by

            mmmmm, sculpting tools and no high poly support sceptic

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • soloS Offline
              solo
              last edited by

              I like the idea a lot and would also like to see if indeed such a ruby can be achieved. I also see Stinkie's point about the poly support as such a script will certainly pile on the polys.
              Additionally such a script would require a pre script which would subdivide the faces into triangles in order for the sculpting to work effectively, with an option to divide it from simple to complex.

              http://www.solos-art.com

              If you see a toilet in your dreams do not use it.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R Offline
                remus
                last edited by

                Itd be cool if there was some way of working it so the script only added polys where necessary, might help to keep the poly limit a bit more reasonable.

                http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • fredo6F Offline
                  fredo6
                  last edited by

                  The brush is manageable (with a very 'robust' progress bar, but I don't get why you need to have a plane shape as the brush. I would rather see a profile (like a Bezier or elliptic shape, that you would translate along the contour on the surface.

                  Did I miss something?

                  Fredo

                  PS: Displacement brush in interactive mode, as described, is another story, and some reflection is needed on how to manage 'naturally' the instruction to dig more or less in the surface at any locations.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • R Offline
                    remus
                    last edited by

                    Im pretty certain this wouldnt be possible within SU (and it probably wouldnt be useful for most people anyway) but you could use the pressure sensitivity in tablets to control the size of the brush.

                    A more workable solution might be to have a 'brush size' that can be adjusted using shortcut keys, either thorugh a series of set sizes or jsut a sliding scale with 'larger' and 'smaller' shortcut keys.

                    http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • utilerU Offline
                      utiler
                      last edited by

                      Hi Guys, this reminds me of a post I make some time ago to do with a possible ruby that could enhance terrain modelling....

                      In addition to these great ideas, I would like to see the Stamp Tool be varied to allow for the input of data for each side of the stamp plane.
                      [see attached]

                      • the first image is what we have straight out of SU... we only have the option to offset the stamp plane to a fixed offset which sets the batters' gradient to the full perimeter....
                      • the second is the result of a vertical cut with the fill side battered at 1:1 [45deg]

                      I know this would help those who work with sloping site immensely; what do you think?

                      And do you think it be done?


                      sandbox-STAMP.png


                      sandbox-STAMP-Variation.png

                      purpose/expression/purpose/....

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S Offline
                        silver_shadow
                        last edited by

                        @unknownuser said:

                        The brush is manageable (with a very 'robust' progress bar, but I don't get why you need to have a plane shape as the brush. I would rather see a profile (like a Bezier or elliptic shape, that you would translate along the contour on the surface.

                        Did I miss something?

                        Fredo

                        PS: Displacement brush in interactive mode, as described, is another story, and some reflection is needed on how to manage 'naturally' the instruction to dig more or less in the surface at any locations.

                        so guys, then do you think its possible to make the first 2 rubies? i know number 3 eats the cake, but if its not possible, is it possible that number 1 and 2 could happen? To me, i think these tools could be so helpfull if you do eg landscaping, it will just make the job a lot easier ๐Ÿ˜‰

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T Offline
                          tomot
                          last edited by

                          @urgen said:

                          ...Z-brush in sketchup? ๐Ÿ˜†... nice idea! ๐Ÿ‘

                          I don't mean to hijack this thread. There must be some Zbrush users here.
                          I just downloaded the Zbrush demo. When I use the SimpleBrush to sculpt on a Sphere 3d. How do I export the my Sculpted Sphere? All I get is an exported obj of the Sphere 3d, without any sculpting.

                          TIA!

                          [my plugins](http://thingsvirtual.blogspot.ca/)
                          tomot

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P Offline
                            princedragoncok
                            last edited by

                            Sounds like some great ideas here. Would love to see these realized ๐Ÿ‘ ๐Ÿ‘ ๐Ÿ‘

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • pilouP Offline
                              pilou
                              last edited by

                              @unknownuser said:

                              How do I export the my Sculpted Sphere?

                              Menu Tool / Export ! ๐Ÿ˜‰
                              Zbrush is not a conformist prog ๐Ÿ’š
                              But I doubt that you can reuse it easily in SU ๐Ÿ˜’
                              It's massive numbers of polygons! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

                              Frenchy Pilou
                              Is beautiful that please without concept!
                              My Little site :)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • T Offline
                                tomot
                                last edited by

                                @unknownuser said:

                                @unknownuser said:

                                How do I export the my Sculpted Sphere?

                                Menu Tool / Export ! ๐Ÿ˜‰
                                Zbrush is not a conformist prog ๐Ÿ’š
                                But I doubt that you can reuse it easily in SU ๐Ÿ˜’
                                It's massive numbers of polygons! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

                                I found that as soon as a 3d object becomes a 2.5D object.It
                                cannnot be exported, is the correct?

                                [my plugins](http://thingsvirtual.blogspot.ca/)
                                tomot

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • pilouP Offline
                                  pilou
                                  last edited by

                                  As soon as you take another tool, you freeze the previous on the screen! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
                                  So you can only save it as a 2D image or 2D.5 file ๐Ÿ˜‰ (3D object are only save by Tool/save โ—
                                  If you want now save (or export) your previous 3D object, just click it in the Tool box, and save ( or export it)! โ˜€

                                  Frenchy Pilou
                                  Is beautiful that please without concept!
                                  My Little site :)

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • 1 / 1
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Buy SketchPlus
                                  Buy SUbD
                                  Buy WrapR
                                  Buy eBook
                                  Buy Modelur
                                  Buy Vertex Tools
                                  Buy SketchCuisine
                                  Buy FormFonts

                                  Advertisement