Is their an individual in you? doubt it.
-
@kwistenbiebel said:
Are you the same guy that got banned from Pushpullbar several times about a year ago?
Push pull bar? Banned? Not yet, You once again got the wrong guy. Why does so many think they know me by another? To quote your last wrong guy. "Kwristen you are a bore"
GoD -
From Wikipedia:
Trolling *is a value judgment referring to behavior that the user of the word considers to be deliberately provocative. So, a troll is a deliberately provocative, attention-seeking, person who seeks to cause disharmony in the community. Many forum members do not encourage or welcome trolls; their reactions ranging from trying to ignore them, to banning them.
Traditional wisdom on internet trolling suggests that the most important thing about trolls is not to feed them. Don't allow them to cause stress. Ignore or revert their edits, but do not communicate with them unless they grow up and change their behavior. The troll is the archetype of an attention-seeker, and attention encourages them to continue trolling.
Trolling is a phenomenon that may afflict any community.*
-
WOW Kwisten that was your 1400th post! By now you must be up to 1750. Perhaps you should read and understand the proof that you hold up so dear. Trump that.
@kwistenbiebel said:
Ignore or revert their edits, but do not communicate with them unless they grow up and change their behavior.
[/i]Well if it is in wikipedia it must be true. your Diagnosis of my motives is not entirely accurate. My definition of the word troll is 1. (mostly to the point) A method of fishing. 2. Simmilar to a hobbit or elf?, 3. A small child's toy with red spiky hair.
Did you learn something today Kwisten? Should I be banned or ignored. you decide?
GoD AKA the troll any name will do.
-
Are you the same person that got banned from Pushpullbar several times about a year ago?
-
Is this thread just going to descend further in to the mists of a slagging match?
-
Lock the thread, please.
-
@goon of doom said:
DAZZY Just what are you trying to say with your cute little smiles? See Above.
GoDOh tisk tisk, I thought you could figure it out.
Come on mate, stop abusing the privilege....
-
-
reaches for the popcorn and coke
-
No 3d glasses juju? you wont be able to enjoy the full cinematic experience without them...
-
Talk about not being original, this guy's is just another Kyanka "goon" wannabe with bad grammar and even worse spelling!!! What kind of dolt proves his own point about himself? Ha ha ha! Just another one of those goons of doom...not very original..actually far too ordinary nowadays and pretty childish.
So go do "something awful" on Second Life where you can rile up 14 year olds with matching maturity, and try not to just amount to being SPAM...
- CraigD -
-
Look at all the edrama
-
@remus said:
Is this thread just going to descend further in to the mists of a slagging match?
That's what Jimmy does, until everyone else gives up reasoning or posting and he inevitably gets the last word, which is usually a twist on someone's user name or just a pop at their views, avatar, etc.
-
@goon of doom said:
MIKE LUCEY Bring it. Sounds like fun.
GoDOkay GoD, this is what I propose. I must admit that you have a knack
for getting up peoples noses BUT have you got the ability to debate a
subject on a level playing field?I proposed a DEBATE between a regular forum member and your good self!
Proposed rules.
- GoD picks 10 subjects (They have to be GENERAL)
- The Nominated SUC Member (to be decided) picks the Subject
- GoD picks a Jury of 3 SUC Forum Members (Any that are willing to Judge / Vote)
- We decide on a 'chance' method to determine who starts ie Closest Lotto Numbers!
- A total of 4 posts allowed from each opponent (No more that 500 words per post)
The PRIZE! If GoD wins, he is free to can carry on being a pain here
If he looses he must promise to behave himself and stop getting up peoples
noses
How about it GoD?
Mike
-
LOl@Mike
I would like to nominate Lewiswadsworth
Time to sort the master debaters from the masturbatersWhat I would like to see more is some of J1mmy's works with SU, or is causing a scene the only thing he can create?
-
Guys, you know there is an "unsubscribe" button at the bottom of the page?
I couldn't help but laugh at the 'Mike Lucies" reference though...
-
Why Andrew, have you subscribed to this particular one?
-
Look Mike.
Get a grip on yourself. The fact is that I should be permitted to carry on as I please as long as I do not get overly personal, swear, am asserting some belief that is somehow overly offensive to a race or sexual orientation. Should I or anyone else be banned or even asked to change their ways based on personal opinion expressed here on this forum.? Mike this is a BAR? What a load of crap. Are you sure you are worthy of the title of Mayor? I am here because I can be. Until you or anyone else who can chooses to step up and say to all of you that your actions will be judged by me.So will that person debate me? Perhaps it is you? On any of his choosing? Makes no difference to me.
The only member I feel that could truly submit an honest assessment of a victor would be some dude who lives in the land of the riding mowers. The rest of those who think they know me, my motives, my values are the marks who choose to assert their poorly thought out 2 bits and generally lost to me in the past. Their aint one here as near as I can tell. So Mike you think you know your membership? I challenge you! But the only one iI will not debate is Riding Mower Ross. That would be suicide.
You put up my opponent. I choose my judge to be on a riding mower. You will be the executioner of me because you can only if Riding Mower Ross says so. That is the only way I will play your silly little game. As you know I have done this now for years only on this Forum and I have NEVER lost. So many have tried.
Mike I participate within your ranks as a active member on a vast variety of subjects within the Corner Bar ONLY. Not all are insulting just me putting my counterpoint on any issue weather I believe it or not. Usually some mark will read my thoughts and attempt to assert their miss-judged intelligence and then it is on. The 3 most common outcomes.
- By far their most convincing argument is to criticize my spelling as a sign of my intelligence or lack there of. That actually to me diminishes theirs for thinking that a typo somehow makes some kind of point. It either makes sense or it don't. Like the midget dork above on the underpowered scooter thinking he is Evil Kanevil. Perhaps him Mike.
- Me silencing them. But not as Jackson has suggested. He knows better than anyone, he has gone up against me and went down in flames storming out whining about how his fragile psycie was damaged. Then rallied to have me banned and lost. again. I think you should nominate him.
- Them stooping to some level that they are later regretful of. ALA most recent casualties Kwisten or Mr Wadsworth and possibly SOLO. Mike these 3 are definatly not up to the task.
So in my world I win.
As for the 10 subjects Look have my challenger suggest his strength that is seen by you as a topic that has a chance as being entertaining. He will start.
But this man does not exist on this planet anyway.These are my terms so accept them or man up and push the button you chump. Until then I will do as I please.
GoD
-
Wow, things are hotting up!!
What I'd really like to see though is GoD V Frank Salinas!!!
[With GaryR50 as the Ref.]
I would pay good money to watch that one, Baby!!!
It would make The Alien V The Predator look like a kids bedtime story!!
Advertisement