Hardware recommendations
-
Good idea tommy, and welcome to the forums.
Im not sure about anyone else, but i found the processors bit of the survey a bit confusing, and kind of weird as well. I cant think of anyone whos got a computer with 8 separate processors, as your survey suggests. Perhaps it would be better to just specify the processor type?
-
Hi Everyone,
Thanks for such a warm welcome
. You all rock, and I appreciate everyone's feedback on the form.Hi remus,
Excellent point about the processors. I struggled with a way to gather this information. I think I left "8" in the number of processors before adding the "Multi-core" question. I'll drop that down to 4.
Hi tomsdesk,
As you may know, GeForce 8800 cards haven't been playing very well with SketchUp. We found an older driver for this card which you can get from http://www.nvidia.com/object/winxp_169.02.html. Regarding vetting additional drivers, I'll see what I can do
. I hope everyone here posts their findings on driver performance as well.Hi Gaieus,
It was a pleasure meeting you, and I know that it won't be the last time we meet. After this post, I received 40 more responses to my survey (which almost doubled what I had). Thanks for your support.
Enjoy!
-
@sketchup guide tommy said:
Excellent point about the processors. I struggled with a way to gather this information. I think I left "8" in the number of processors before adding the "Multi-core" question. I'll drop that down to 4.
Wait a minute
.
Indeed 8 processors is still very rare (only servers?).
8 cores on the other hand isn't that rare.
My Mac Pro (using Vista on it) has 8 cores but only 2 (quadcore) processors (4 cores each).I think that, if you want the survey to be useful, the technicalities should be correct.
By the way: welcome
-
I use a Macbook Pro 2.5Ghz C2D, 2GB ram, Nvidia 8600m gt 512 mb, It works pretty well. However my latest model was too complicated and time by time it was hard to navigate and create new objects. The configuration that is sufficient for you depends on what you are doing. I would prefer having a workstation graphics card. However cpu is more than enough. I get renders on Vray and it is really fast.
-
Tommy, thanks.
Hope you can indeed get something done (if something still needs done after the release of the Great and Wonderous Wizarding Seven :`) I went with the Quadro a few months ago, only to find the latest Autodesk driver is the closest I can get to an SU wonder...done again, as things stand, I would have gone with the Geforce and spent my money on double the ram.
Best, Tom.
-
Tommy,
Welcome.
Thank you for this survey. I think its a great idea.One suggestion, if possible, is to add a question of if any given system is using RAID hard drives and also a question on hard drive speeds.
I am currently using a VISTA Laptop (Core Duo 2.4, 4 gigs ram, NVIDA GeForece 8800M and Raid hard drives) and it handles SketchUp in ways I did not think was possible. I have very large models as well (1 million to 3 million faces) and it was jaw dropping. Its not perfect with Vista for something’s but I have a feeling the RAID is making a difference.
Thank you
Daniel Tal -
tald311, may I ask, which RAID configuration you are using and what harddiscs (speed, company...) that are?
I am going to buy a new notebook soon. and what you describe...@tald311 said:
...and it handles SketchUp in ways I did not think was possible. I have very large models as well (1 million to 3 million faces) and it was jaw dropping.
...sounds simply amazing.
cheers,
Jakob
-
I didn't know sketchup was that dependant on the hard drive.
In 'Preferences' , I always see to it the' auto save' option is turned 'off' as it causes SU to slow down a lot, but I am surprised to hear that the hard drive has such an influence...Is this maybe because SU is not 'large adress aware' (it can only use a limited amount of RAM) and turns to the page file instead ? (=using a part of the hard drive as RAM replacement).
That could explain why better hard drives (in a RAID configuration) actually provide a speed gain.... -
I am not sure what SketchUp uses as hardware. I use gaming systems for modeling since they are designed for handling 3D models.
The only thing I am sure about SketchUp is it is single-core and that is because of the real-time rendering stuff. One of the Devs explained it to me but I am not that tech savy (so take this whole e-mail with a grain of salt).
The system that I just bought is this one:
http://www.gateway.com/systems/product/529668093.php
I know that RAID drives is recommended for some 3D games. And since I am a gamer (added bonus) I look for the most intensive graphics games I can find and see if my system can run it.
The current problem is VISTA and Shadows buts that only limitation I have run into. I am hoping SU 7 responds better to Vista since we do not have a choice any more but to use it.
I do know with Vista that JPEG snap shots I cannot take in XP, I can in Vista with high-rez. Your system does need to be designed for 3D graphics though – what ever that might be, which is why your survey is a GREAT IDEA!
Thank you again.
Daniel Tal
-
I have a 256 mb Ati Radeon (I think X550) card in my desktop. I cannot really speed things up with hardware acceleration but get along with it pretty well. Some people have issues with ATI cards however so wait till a more experienced "hardware guru" chimes in.
-
anyone uses radeon hd4850 for sketchup?
i heard radeon cards aren't very compatible with openGL apps..thx for the fast reply gaieus, and anyway this is my 1st post.. nice 2 meet u all
-
Great idea for the hardware survey! I wish it would've been done before I upgraded my machine. I ended up going with the HPm9340f. For less than a grand, I got equipped with an Intel Q6700 Quad core, 6 GB ram, 750 GB HD and a NVDIA 9500GS with 768MB dedicated video memory, upgraded from a AMD 64 bit processor. I've seen a drastic improvement in handling large models in sketchup and it's cut my render times down by almost 80%. It's a good "bang for the buck" machine if anyone is undecided. I would still wait for Tommy's survey though.
-
What a great idea- I filled in the survey.
-
Hi All
I am new to the forum and this is my first post! Hurrah! Just want to say what a fantastic job you guys have done to keep this forum fresh and relevant.
I am looking for a new desktop computer so this thread is very useful to me. Having filled out the questionaire I would like to make a comment that some of you probably have picked up already. From my experience rating performance of your own machine is too subjective. It would mostly depend on the level of complexity needed in the individual modeler and therefore relying own their own judegement is perhaps not the best way to go about this. Perhaps there should be a collection of models for download with increasing complexity and let people note down each model from the lower end until their computer starts to show jerkiness on screen or show serious slowdown then post which model did it. Just a thought
-
You are perfectly right about this (and welcome, by the way) but I hope that at least some basic data will be collected now.
We also used to have topic about performance and there was a file with several scenes and more and more instances of the same component in those scenes (on layers). It was interesting to see how different machines performed.
-
is there a way to show the framerate, with which SketchUp is displaying the model, when moved?
because that would be a very objective figure. (or is it possible to write a ruby that does that)just click through the scenes in the test file (complexity increases). then there are some "framerate test scenes" where the complexity doesn't increase, so that you can have a look at the framerate when moving the model.
dumb question: are there different model-types or -settings that effect different hardware components (like styles = gpu, poly-count = cpu and ram...)? the test file should mind these factors as well.
...now that I think of it. could't one of the ruby masters write a script that produces a text file with framerates achieved during the test? then we could open the test file, start the ruby, start an animation (with scene delay). when the animation is finished, either upload the text file here or post the results...
-
Now that's a great idea Jakob! Not subjective and not restricted to very low-end or very high-end systems as some "can you run this skp animation?" based tests are.
-
we just need someone to write a script that puts the framerate in a text-file (I have unfortunately not the slightest idea of how to do anything in ruby).
the best way to put it, would be something like:- scene1 to scene2 = 76 fps
- scene2 to scene3 = 44 fps
- scene3...
and then we need a nice test-file that not only tests your hardware, but also makes testing enjoyable (like starting with a small village with few simple houses, going to a city of decent size and finishing with a huge capital (loads of polygons) with a big castle or cathedral in the centre...
(that is a nice idea for the competition thread)
[Edit] I just used an old model to demonstrate, how such a scene could look like. of course it would be much more enjoyable, if you had a bit more variety... but as I said, this is only a first idea[]
I just spotted a problem (I think). how much do components affect cpu and ram? because the file size should be rather small for fast download - therefore should consist of components... but can we test all necessary information with that?
[Edit] I just used an old model to demonstrate, how such a scene could look like. of course it would be much more enjoyable, if you had a bit more variety... but as I said, this is only a first idea[]
-
The old gold standard test file (all those peeps) is pretty small...right? Also, isn't important to run thru the pages once to load as much as possible in whatever ram is available...I get different results second time thru?
-
@plot-paris said:
I just spotted a problem (I think). how much do components affect cpu and ram? because the file size should be rather small for fast download - therefore should consist of components... but can we test all necessary information with that?
Not entirely sure what the question is but my understanding is that components will make the saved file quite a bit smaller, however once the drawing is open they make no difference whatsoever in terms of fps.
-Brodie
Advertisement