View an interactive SU model on a web page
-
Anyone know of any software to generate an interactive model that can be viewed on a web page without the viewer having to have some special software on their computer (i.e. not having to install the SU Viewer)?
I am ware of Shapespark and the ability to post interactive 3D pdf files generated with SimLab Composer or 3D PDF Maker. From my exploration Shapespark comes the closest to what I am looking for.
-
Upload your model to the 3D warehouse.
It has to be "public"
Push the button at the lowest arrow.
You will find the code to imbedd your model via a iframe.Bep
-
Pilou posted this
https://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=72791#p663039 -
@Bep, I am wanting to publish something on our web site where our clients can navigate/view site and equipment models interactively.
@dav_id said:
Pilou posted this
https://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=72791#p663039When I clicked on the link I got a message that said I was not authorized to view the page.
-
It's because you pass by the French Forum
Here the direct linkBut I am not sure that is what you want!
This one is more like you want : https://roundme.com
-
Well that is a little closer. I was hoping some woul come up with something that we cold host rather than being "in the cloud" or on a hosted server. I also would like to provide the ability to walk through, provide interactive "hot spots" and alter objects (I.e. Material selectors). My concentration is in the architectural field.
Roundme is pretty good but is limited to 360 views (which by itself is very good).
Shapespark is almost exactly the type of tool I was thinking of. I was just wondering if there were any other tools like it.
-
-
Thanks Pilou. 3DVista is the kind of thing I was interested in. Has some really neat options.
-
@ntxdave said:
Thanks Pilou. 3DVista is the kind of thing I was interested in. Has some really neat options.
Yup, 3DVista is the schizz, I'd like to get it some time but 500 Euro isn't something I can afford right now.
There are some other options obviously, take a look at this review of various virtual tour software for some more insight into options.
-
Interesting timing of your question and the mention of 3D Vista, we got it about a month ago and it’s quite good.
We use Enscape to render and along with stills and video it can render panoramas. Here’s a couple of tour’s I’ve done so far: -
@juju said:
There are some other options obviously, take a look at this review of various virtual tour software for some more insight into options.
This was sure an interesting video but it concentrates on pano photos. I am particularly interested in presenting my SU model. However, the "sponsor" might want to look at some of these for presenting finished projects.
@paul russam said:
Interesting timing of your question and the mention of 3D Vista, we got it about a month ago and it’s quite good.
We use Enscape to render and along with stills and video it can render panoramas. Here’s a couple of tour’s I’ve done so far:I am assuming you used 3DVista for these. Some nice graphic interaction. Again, your sites are primarily using pano views. But again, the graphic hotspots are very interesting. If I get some "sponsor" interest, I think I am going to give it a try. Can you tell me if there is an option to self-host instead of uploading everything to their server?
I appreciate the feedback from both of you.
-
Pano views is all 3DVista does, it’s purpose is to create the tours.
Their hosting is poor, i export to a local folder and upload each one to a subdomain, the Blackrock one is about 80mb and the halfpenny is about 50mb.
If you want 3D on the web where the viewer is free to look/wander around then Enscape has an export to web or you could try SketchFab, each have limitations the biggest being that the viewers comp needs to be relatively good. -
Sim Lab can also make that you want...with VR or not...Interactive etc...
-
@pilou said:
Sim Lab can also make that you want...with VR or not...Interactive etc...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ujb618o3yF8
+1
Was thinking of this as well given the feedback above.
Advertisement