sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    [Plugin] OBJexporter v3.0 20130131

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Plugins
    304 Posts 96 Posters 451.3k Views 96 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • TIGT Offline
      TIG Moderator
      last edited by

      @Sound

      I am afraid you are mistaken. πŸ˜•
      I have tested this extensively and a cube of 6 faces exports as a cube of 12 facets, because they are each triangulated.
      You can clearly see it in the OBJ code.
      If I import the OBJ it then arrives with 12 triangulated faces too.
      this occurs with many OBJ importing apps.

      IF you triangulate the faces manually before exporting you can create internal 'partitions' inside the cube depending on the order the diagonals are drawn, this should only make more that the visible 12 faces πŸ˜•

      So this suggests there is something wrong with your initial cube if it indeed has 16 facets when exported, or alternatively something wrong with the app into which you are importing it? There are many apps that import these OBJ files quite acceptably without new facets or complaints about unconnected facets...
      What are you using to import it ?

      The code takes faces in the same context using the same material, triangulates them as necessary and produces the facets to suit. This tool is used as the basis of several rendering apps. The Pro OBJ exporter exports a simple cube with a file that is all but identical to this tool's file, so I don't think there's anything wrong with it...

      Try the Pro version OBJ exporter and see it's the same...

      I suspect you are either mis-modeling the cube beforehand OR not using appropriate import settings and getting spurious results... I suggest you make an OBJ made from a 1m cube in the positive quadrant of the axes, bb.min at [0,0,0]. Then compare it with mine in the ZIP, which only has 12 facets...


      obj.zip

      TIG

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S Offline
        Sound
        last edited by

        Thank you for the answer. Yes, it looks like those internal faces were already in SketchUp. A new test shows 12 facets, and that's fine.

        Still, the other problem persists. Even when the exported cube results in 12 facets, the file contains 24 vertices (you can check this by opening the OBJ file with Meshlab or any other importer, or even by counting the "v" lines in the OBJ file). This looks very wrong, as the original geometry only has 8 vertices. Can you help me about this issue too? Thanks!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • TIGT Offline
          TIG Moderator
          last edited by

          So no apology for putting me to unpaid trouble when it was entirely your error? πŸ˜’
          My exporter does work differently from the pro-OBJexporter, which minimizes the number of vertices by recycling them when possible.
          However, my version treats each context, material and face as a separate set, and doesn't reused vertices. The coding is such that it would be very awkward to effect...
          However, it has no noticeable effect on the resulting form and a ood 3rd party app should be able to cope with welding vertices etc anyway...
          Get Pro if you really do NEED this functionality, and are not just being 'anally retentive'.
          After all my tool is 'free' [donationware] and you cannot readily expect, let alone demand, changes to its functions... πŸ˜’

          TIG

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S Offline
            Sound
            last edited by

            Well, I'm just reporting a bug. A cube, having 8 vertices, is exported with 24 vertices 😲
            This is a wrong representation of the object and has a very noticeable impact on all uses of the OBJ file when topologic integrity is required (3D printing is one example).

            Of course I expect nothing from you, being it freeware. Whether you want to fix this bug or leave it there is entirely up to you.

            Sadly, your code is not even covered by an open source license (it's "all rights reserved"), so people are not allowed to fix this bug and redistribute a fixed version. 😒

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • TIGT Offline
              TIG Moderator
              last edited by

              @Sound

              The vertex 'duplication' isn't actually a 'bug', since that would suggest that it isn't doing what it is intended to do: and it currently does exactly what it is coded to do.
              However, I do take your [inelegantly put] point that vertex entries could be 'reused' if they are 'shared' by more that one facet...

              So I now have an idea on to make an adjusted version of the code that will now does this: and it can also have a few other tweaks; to reduce the file size further, to optimize the processing time etc.

              I'll post it soonest...

              PS: Although I do 'reserve all rights' to my code... please feel free to make your own improvements to any of my tools, and either PM me or post them here, of course for free unfettered use by all members... The only thing I ask is not to post whole scripts in the same thread as it'll cause confusion... πŸ˜’

              TIG

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • TIGT Offline
                TIG Moderator
                last edited by

                Here's v2.8 http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=294844#p294844
                The D.P. accuracy is not now applied to 'whole numbers', and any -0 values becomes 0.
                Any shared-vertex entries are now 'reused'.
                The OBJ file size is minimized and the processing time is optimized.

                TIG

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S Offline
                  Sound
                  last edited by

                  TIG, thank you very much for working on that and for clarifying your terms about modifying the script.
                  I will test the new version as soon as possible and report success or failure.
                  Have a good day.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S Offline
                    Sound
                    last edited by

                    I can confirm this works for any model I tried.
                    Thank you! Exported OBJ is now topologically correct and thus suitable for a lot more uses.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • TIGT Offline
                      TIG Moderator
                      last edited by

                      Good.

                      TIG

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • TIGT Offline
                        TIG Moderator
                        last edited by

                        Here's v2.9 http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=294844#p294844
                        Merging of shared vertices is now optional, as it slows down processing for larger models considerably; and it is only required by some more picky mesh-apps, but renderers etc don't seem to mind non-merged vertex data at all.

                        TIG

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • TIGT Offline
                          TIG Moderator
                          last edited by

                          Here's v3.0 http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=294844#p294844
                          It has a much improved shared-vertex merging algorithm that is now slightly faster than a non-merging version, so the option 'not to merge' has been removed because it is now of no benefit.

                          Where possible, shared-vertex data is always reused, ensuring correctly formed geometry.
                          This can mean that a SKP export containing 100,000 faces and therefore potentially 300,000 vertices can be 'compacted' to use perhaps 50,000 shared-vertices [but of course this depends on each SKP's geometry, grouping etc]: this 'compaction' also reduces processing time [which will now be perhaps ~60 seconds for this sized example], and when combined with the latest optimized 'numerical-entries' gives much smaller OBJ file sizes, and faster processing in 3rd-party apps too.

                          TIG

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • andybotA Offline
                            andybot
                            last edited by

                            Great work, as usual, TIG!! This plugin is very essential for me. Many thanks for your development efforts!

                            http://charlottesvillearchitecturalrendering.com/

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • cottyC Offline
                              cotty
                              last edited by

                              Thank you for this update!

                              my SketchUp gallery

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S Offline
                                samurai1789
                                last edited by

                                What simple instructions???? What ever i do i cannot find it HELP!!!!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • TIGT Offline
                                  TIG Moderator
                                  last edited by

                                  @samurai1789 said:

                                  What simple instructions???? What ever i do i cannot find it HELP!!!!
                                  They are on the download page ! http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=294844#p294844
                                  There are also some simple dialogs as you go after the tool is started...
                                  What problems do you have otherwise ?

                                  TIG

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • thomthomT Offline
                                    thomthom
                                    last edited by

                                    @tig said:

                                    The D.P. accuracy is not now applied to 'whole numbers', and any -0 values becomes 0.

                                    What made you chose to do this? Are there applications that doesn't handle these values well? I'm curious because I've been looking at the OBJ format this weekend.
                                    (Is there an official specification somewhere? I find multiple sources around...)

                                    Thomas Thomassen β€” SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
                                    List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • pilouP Offline
                                      pilou
                                      last edited by

                                      See the external links at the end of the page πŸ˜„

                                      Frenchy Pilou
                                      Is beautiful that please without concept!
                                      My Little site :)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • thomthomT Offline
                                        thomthom
                                        last edited by

                                        @unknownuser said:

                                        See the external links at the end of the page πŸ˜„

                                        Is that the official specs though? "martinreddy.net" ...

                                        Thomas Thomassen β€” SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
                                        List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • TIGT Offline
                                          TIG Moderator
                                          last edited by

                                          @thomthom said:

                                          @tig said:

                                          The D.P. accuracy is not now applied to 'whole numbers', and any -0 values becomes 0.

                                          What made you chose to do this? Are there applications that doesn't handle these values well? I'm curious because I've been looking at the OBJ format this weekend.
                                          (Is there an official specification somewhere? I find multiple sources around...)
                                          It just minimizes the OBJ file size, an importer reads 0 as 0.0, so making it 0.000000 is pointless, -0==0 so it might as well be 0 !... so all trailing zeros are now omitted, it speeds up the writing by a few % and I also the importing at the 3rd party end...
                                          There's an OBJ Wavefront Wiki...

                                          TIG

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • thomthomT Offline
                                            thomthom
                                            last edited by

                                            Are you sure all importers manage to read an int instead of a float which the specs appear to indicate? Just wondering in case the parsing is implemented in a stricter language...

                                            @tig said:

                                            I also the importing at the 3rd party end...

                                            Something missing from that sentence? πŸ˜•

                                            @tig said:

                                            There's an OBJ Wavefront Wiki...

                                            This one? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavefront_.obj_file

                                            Thomas Thomassen β€” SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
                                            List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 9
                                            • 10
                                            • 11
                                            • 12
                                            • 13
                                            • 14
                                            • 15
                                            • 16
                                            • 11 / 16
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Buy SketchPlus
                                            Buy SUbD
                                            Buy WrapR
                                            Buy eBook
                                            Buy Modelur
                                            Buy Vertex Tools
                                            Buy SketchCuisine
                                            Buy FormFonts

                                            Advertisement