SketchyPhysics3.1
-
That error [
undefined method
extend_object' forSingleton'
] is from a standard RUBY installation [singleton.rb
] - where it might be called by several other standard modules/classes/methods - BUT as far as I know it has nothing to do with the SketchUp version if Ruby OR SketchyPhysics itself. Do you have other 'Ruby files' loading, that aren't standard Plugin scripts ?? -
@mickeyao said:
I get a message: Error Loading File sketchyphysics.rb
undefined methodextend_object' for
Singleton'I get the same error.
-
I suggest you PM CPhillips about it... he's the author
-
hello,
I want a free software that would allow me to record my video made ββafter SketchyPhysics in order to watch them out of sketchup.
Thank you. -
-
Ok but for MacOSX. I'm sorry...
-
Chris, great work on SP. Love it! I hope I am not missing anything prior to writing this. When I click the Win3.2 version, I get the save file dialog with a 3.1 title. After running the installation, my animation tells me, upper left corner, SP 3.2 required. I guess the install isn't taking well, or....? TIA
DOD -
Any developers working on the SketchyPhysics Project should either update it's status, or mark it as Dead.
The current update rate is not a proffesional way to leave such things. -
Does anyone know the current status of SP?
According to Google Code, the source repository no longer exists, so it leaves it nigh on impossible to pick up where Chris left off - if it has indeed been abandoned - Does anyone have a link to an alternative location of the source (preferably a repository) please?
Is there anyone else interested in continuing development of this excellent addition to Sketchup?
-
-
@unknownuser said:
Thanks, but that repository only contains documentation, not code. Was the code ever published?
-
I read that on the page above on the last line
@unknownuser said:
Source code for the plugin is in the install.
-
I see that now, thank you.
I'd rather hoped to see a history of revisions to understand the rationale behind some of the changes and inclusions, but I'll continue to trawl through the scripts making notes given the lack of inline comments.
Thanks for the sanity check.
-
I'd love to help in some way with the furtherance of SP but I have only just begun to learn Ruby let alone everything else that is required.
If I can help in any way I will. Personally I think SP could be a commercially viable product with a good polishing - anyone ever see any code for SP4? If its as good as it sounded I would pay for it.
Has Chris totally dropped the SP project now? The whole thing is a testament to Chris' brilliance and I feel I have missed out to have not got seriously involved until now.
-
@cphillips said:
Here is the long awaited new version of SP. Hopefully this version will be much more stable under SU8.
http://code.google.com/p/sketchyphysics/downloads/list
Check out the Release Notes for changes:
http://code.google.com/p/sketchyphysics/wiki/ReleaseNotes3_1All the scripted events and commands. This list will get fleshed out over time.
http://code.google.com/p/sketchyphysics/wiki/ScriptFunctionsMac version, more docs and examples to follow....
Updated Oct 7 2010
Changes:
http://code.google.com/p/sketchyphysics/wiki/SP31Oct7Hi,
i am a beginner and i don't know where to put event codes in sketchup. By the way are they for win or mac? Thank you -
hi kmlkarablt
Please , look at theses linkshttps://sites.google.com/site/sketchyphysicstutorial/home
http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=61&t=46796
and in the wharehouse
bye
chri
-
@chri said:
hi kmlkarablt
Please , look at theses linkshttps://sites.google.com/site/sketchyphysicstutorial/home
http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=61&t=46796
and in the wharehouse
bye
chri
Thank you.
-
I want to be able to build and test bridges that support (and collapse) under load tests. I am really miffed as to where to start. Would you help me get started. I don't know ruby but I'm a little versed in C++. BTW, sketchy physics is really cool. Thanks.
-
@ashscott said:
I'd love to help in some way with the furtherance of SP but I have only just begun to learn Ruby let alone everything else that is required.
If I can help in any way I will. Personally I think SP could be a commercially viable product with a good polishing - anyone ever see any code for SP4? If its as good as it sounded I would pay for it.
Has Chris totally dropped the SP project now? The whole thing is a testament to Chris' brilliance and I feel I have missed out to have not got seriously involved until now.
I support your desire to bring SP4 to the community !!!
Maybe a Kickstarter campaign could send a message and bring more power to the cause !!! -
Kickstarter could be cool - would require the people that know the code to get on board though - even if they allow running of fundraising initiatives to be delegated to us, we still need them to code it.
What do you think Chris? - Several free versions of SP up to 3 point whatever and then a robust, powerful paid version 4.0?
I'd certainly buy it and I would be happy to put administrative work into making it happen
Advertisement