[Plugin] Honeycomber
-
With $LOAD_PATH appears the default paths to the plugins & tools folders but it appears the main path to my user count "/Users/Oxer" i don't know why. I have deleted the rest of the plugins in this path, for example in my downloads folder, etc.
TIG this is the result with the two codes, circle in Z/ blue axis.
-
Sorry Oxer, to try and get this more logical, here's a set of steps.
Make a ~1m circle flat on the ground, centered on the ORIGIN.
Move it up 11".Open the Ruby Console and run two raytests.
Sketchup.active_model.raytest([Geom::Point3d.new(0,0,-111), Z_AXIS])
then
Sketchup.active_model.raytest([Geom::Point3d.new(0,0,-111), Z_AXIS], true)
Next do two more raytests.
Sketchup.active_model.raytest([Geom::Point3d.new(0,0,111), Z_AXIS.reverse])
then
Sketchup.active_model.raytest([Geom::Point3d.new(0,0,111), Z_AXIS,reverse], true)Now move the circle downwards by 22" so it's below the ORIGIN.
Repeat the 4 tests...
Sketchup.active_model.raytest([Geom::Point3d.new(0,0,-111), Z_AXIS])
then
Sketchup.active_model.raytest([Geom::Point3d.new(0,0,-111), Z_AXIS], true)
then
Sketchup.active_model.raytest([Geom::Point3d.new(0,0,111), Z_AXIS.reverse])
then
Sketchup.active_model.raytest([Geom::Point3d.new(0,0,111), Z_AXIS,reverse], true)Move the circle exactly onto the ORIGIN and repeat the 4 step test...
Post the text results from the Ruby Console...
I suspect that your MAC can't cope with certain permutations of axes and z values, or perhaps the optional wysiwyg flag ??? -
Sorry TIG, in Spain we are in holidays (Saint Week) i'm going to travel when i back i'll continue with the testing.
Bye, best wishes. -
No problems, I am on hols from tonight anyway...
-
Hi TIG,
Is it possible to use this script to create space frames with regular geometry that can be tessellated e.g. a tetrhedron, octahedron, or dodecahedron? -
@oisin.higgins said:
Hi TIG,
Is it possible to use this script to create space frames with regular geometry that can be tessellated e.g. a tetrahedron, octahedron, or dodecahedron?
Yes, theoretically...
This is v1.0
The math would just get extra extra complicated...
I do have '3 sided' [equilateral triangles] on the to-do-list already - which would give 'reinforced hexagonal honeycombs... -
Oxer/SUFractal
Thomthom has just pointed out that your versions of v8 are out of date and were replaced by updated that fixed certain issues - including some with model.raytest...
Please download the latest v8pro version for your OS, install then then retest...
Report back - it would be nice to know that the fix was as simple as you getting the latest version of the software... before you report an issue
-
@tig said:
Oxer/SUFractal
Thomthom has just pointed out that your versions of v8 are out of date and were replaced by updated that fixed certain issues - including some with model.raytest...
Please download the latest v8pro version for your OS, install then then retest...
Report back - it would be nice to know that the fix was as simple as you getting the latest version of the software... before you report an issueTIG/TT:
I've updated SU (Version 8.0.11751) as you suggested.
Honeycomber, Instant Roof, SectionCutFace, and SketchUpBIM all seem to be getting along nicely so far.
(Why didn't I think of something so simple as that?
)Thanks for all your help ... I'll post in the SketchUpBIM thread/post.
-
Well at least we know it's fixed.
It was remiss of me that I didn't spot your v8 was out of date.
Luckily TT noticed it ! -
Here's v1.1 http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=395061#p395061
A glitch with the undo code is now fixed; it will now always undo in one step. -
@sufractal said:
(Why didn't I think of something so simple as that?
)As a general rule of thumb: When you have a software issue, first ensure you have the latest version. Your issue might very well be fixed already. And for 3D related applications, also check your graphic card driver.
-
Here's v1.2 http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=395061#p395061
It now has a 3 sided option making equilateral perforations, which assemble into hexagons etc thus
-
@tig said:
Here's v1.2 http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=395061#p395061
It now has a 3 sided option making equilateral perforations, which assemble into hexagons etc thusTIG:
Just downloaded the new version (w/ 3-sided option). Same issues as before. Tool appears to begin working, TIG::Honeycomber: Perforating appears in status bar ......... appears, then spinning wheel of death appears and refuses to go away.
-
Be patient !
How many perforations are you making ?
If there are many hundreds it will take a looong time !
Try it with a small number and see if it works then.
If, before running the tool, you open the Ruby Console do you get any error messages in it ?
Works fine for me and many others...
You do have SUp v8M2 ?
Must be something you are doing ?? -
@tig said:
Be patient !
How many perforations are you making ?
If there are many hundreds it will take a looong time !
Try it with a small number and see if it works then.
If, before running the tool, you open the Ruby Console do you get any error messages in it ?
Works fine for me and many others...
You do have SUp v8M2 ?
Must be something you are doing ??TIG:
No error message in ruby console prior to tool. Running current version (you reminded me to upgrade remember?) of SU. Trying default setting that pops up. 30+ minutes later and the spinning wheel of death remains. Am I doing anything wrong?
BTW ... the previous version (w/o the 3-sided option) seems to work fine.
-
Try with a 4" cube it'd take a fraction of the time! [with ~125+ perforations, each with 8 faces etc]
This one took ~2 minutes.
I replicated your 8" cube on my PC and it eventually made it in ~150 minutes
.
There are ~729+ perforations, each with 8 faces etc... It all adds up...
So it is not just 10x slower, because the more entities you add to a context the slower Sketchup runs disproportionately... each extra step adds exponentially, time-wise.I think you don't need so many holes ???
If you open Task Manager when running a looooong process you will see that Sketchup is still working.
It's just taking a-g-e-s to process all of the needed geometry...In passing... please adjust your default Template's, Model Info > Units to show some decimal inches !
-
@tig said:
Try with a 4" cube it'd take a fraction of the time! [with ~125+ perforations, each with 8 faces etc]
This one took ~2 minutes.[attachment=0:97y792mn]<!-- ia0 -->Capture4.PNG<!-- ia0 -->[/attachment:97y792mn]
I replicated your 8" cube on my PC and it eventually made it in ~150 minutes .
There are ~729+ perforations, each with 8 faces etc... It all adds up...
So it is not just 10x slower, because the more entities you add to a context the slower Sketchup runs disproportionately... each extra step adds exponentially, time-wise.I think you don't need so many holes ???
If you open Task Manager when running a looooong process you will see that Sketchup is still working.
It's just taking a-g-e-s to process all of the needed geometry...In passing... please adjust your default Template's, Model Info > Units to show some decimal inches !
4" cube with simple perforation offers no change in operation.
I'll continue to work in the units I need, thanks. -
Complex point of the porous,the generation process is very slow.
-
Guanjin
The more geometry there is the slower the processing.
It's inevitable.
Set it running and make some tea... -
@tig said:
Guanjin
The more geometry there is the slower the processing.
It's inevitable.
Set it running an make some tea...Thank you of TIG: you have worked hard, so many good tools for free use, you are great!
Advertisement