sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    Scaling of distorted ground floor layout

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Newbie Forum
    sketchup
    5 Posts 2 Posters 302 Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P Offline
      pdonner
      last edited by

      Hi everybody. I'm working with a group of fellow newbie SketchUp planners who intend to model the houses of our village. We rely on architecture plans showing the layout of the ground floor as well as images of the facades. The design process starts by importing the scanned plan of the ground floor. The plan is scaled to approximately the real size. Then we place guides along the outer walls and insert dimension shapes to indicate the main measurements. This is good for the design process and we intend to use a 2D rendering of this layout to prove that the design has correct size when the model is submitted for publication in Google Earth. - At this point we group all these entities, to keep them connected while scaling.

      It is very easy to scale the image to exactly correct dimension in one direction. Every newbie should know that this is done by using the tape measure tool. The distance between the two outer walls is being measured by toggling the tool with the Ctrl key into the measurement mode (no plus sign). Then the measurement visible in the architecture plan is entered. By pushing Enter and accepting the resize, the image will scale in both directions to accommodate with this value.

      This should do the job. We actually do get the exactly correct dimension... in one direction. Unfortunately the architecture plans are never very precise and the scanning process may enter distortions as well. But we would like to have both main dimensions exactly correct (which will also please the GE evaluators).

      It is possible to gradually iterate towards the correct measurement in the second direction by using the scale tool, but this is a bit cumbersome and tedious method. - Does anybody have a speedier procedure to arrive at the exactly correct second dimension?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • TIGT Offline
        TIG Moderator
        last edited by

        The tapemeasure tool is a quick way to 'scale' the whole thing in every axis...

        Use Scale for one axis, and type in the required dimension for that axis [size], with a units suffix - e.g. 20'6" or 6m - it will scale in that axis to that size - no 'tweaking this and that' is necessary...
        You can also scale in the other axis by any required dimension too...
        Type a number scales by that factor BUT giving a dimension suffix makes the scale in that axis that dimension.
        🤓

        TIG

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P Offline
          pdonner
          last edited by

          Thanks TIG for your kind advice.

          @tig said:

          The tapemeasure tool is a quick way to 'scale' the whole thing in every axis...

          I think that the tape measure is even more handy than that. You can actually scale any part of the image to an exact size by typing in the required dimension. The problem is that this doesn't give access to the other dimension.

          @tig said:

          Use Scale for one axis, and type in the required dimension for that axis [size], with a units suffix - e.g. 20'6" or 6m - it will scale in that axis to that size - no 'tweaking this and that' is necessary... / You can also scale in the other axis by any required dimension too...

          Quite correct. The need for tweaking arises from the fact that the other dimension is in the image. This puts us in a situation where we don't actually know the other outer dimension (before it has been scaled).

          I'll add an image to make the scenario I described a bit clearer:

          http://sites.google.com/site/iivantiira3d/rakennuspiirustuksen-mittakaavan-asettaminen/rakennus_3_1_ver_2.png

          But is there a handier way of fixing the other dimension?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • TIGT Offline
            TIG Moderator
            last edited by

            They way you are doing it is pretty much the right one, BUT here is a one page tutorial on what I think is the easiest/best way...CorrectingTheScalingOfPlanImages.png

            TIG

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P Offline
              pdonner
              last edited by

              Thanks TIG. You produced a very nice enhancement of our scheme by offering the TIG two dimension scaling formula that was really missing from our scheme:

              layout_dimension / model_dimension = scaling_factor

              To be honest: There are still a couple of fine details that we pay attention to in order to get it all right. We play with the snapping and resolution settings of the Model Info > Units property sheet while setting the guides and moving back to scaling.

              And yes, it is indeed a good idea to lock the group after successful scaling.

              TIG's tutorial sheet is excellent. I summarized our findings in Finnish on the web site of the group: http://sites.google.com/site/iivantiira3d/rakennuspiirustuksen-mittakaavan-asettaminen.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • 1 / 1
              • First post
                Last post
              Buy SketchPlus
              Buy SUbD
              Buy WrapR
              Buy eBook
              Buy Modelur
              Buy Vertex Tools
              Buy SketchCuisine
              Buy FormFonts

              Advertisement