Follow-Me Tool on Multiple Lines.

takesh h

@thomthom said:

If you set the Minimum rounding Angle to 180 or more it won't round the corners.

Aha!

pilou

@unknownuser said:

so you need "deletecoplanaredges" ruby to get rid of unneeded edges before pushpulling them

So select all, intersect "Selection", then Remove unused edges

@unknownuser said:

If you set the Minimum rounding Angle to 180 or more it won't round the corners.

Cool trick!

thomthom

It's not very obvious. But once I get a webdialog it'll become clearer what the various things do.

takesh h

@tig said:

My script Latticeizer does something like this...

OMG where did I get this script?
It's not in RubyLibraryDepot, it's not listed in Jim's SketchUp-Ruby Resources...
But misteriously it's in my [Plugin] folder!
Right, this script does the job beautifully. I should include this in the visual index.

OK it's here! >>> http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?f=15&p=72154

TIG

Latticeizer doesn't use FollowMe, it uses Offset and then PushPull, with an algorithm to work out what parts should end up solid or void... It cannot do separated loops, holes etc as this will confuse things. If you add some lines to connected the inner circles to the outermost edges it might work... It is not foolproof !

pilou

About Latticeizer by TIG
Seems there is a little problem when there is intersection of lines
sure that must not be evident to resolve

pilou

thx for the explanation

dtrarch

ThomThom

Probably something you already know but the script does not work on inclined curves or multiple inclined connecting lines.

Sure would be nice to have this work on the above for vertical surface detail and boolean and ???

Just a thought.

dtr

thomthom

@dtrarch said:

Probably something you already know but the script does not work on inclined curves or multiple inclined connecting lines.

Yes. It will only work planar. That's by design as it simplifies things allot. 3D will have to come later.

TIG

To make it work in 3D you could...
Take selected centre-lines that are on the 3D surface and 'drape' them onto a flat face above it.
Run the tool and take the result and again 'drape' it onto the 3D surface below.
Erase unwanted stuff.
To 'drape' to flat you simply change all of the edge's z's to = flat plane (which is defined as above the lowest level of 3D surface).
To 'drape' onto a surface you need to project a ray down from each edge's end-points onto the 3D surfaces faces and then do a global move by vectors on them to avoid 'folding' ?

Bob James

Latticeizer: What a really cool tool, TIG

I don't know what this thing is or what I'd ever use it for, but I know that modeling it would have taken a lot longer than the two minutes it took to make it with Latticeizer

Sorry to "muscle in" on your discussion ThomThom, but this was just too much fun to pass up.

![A few quick lines, Latticeizer, render in IDX Renditioner and, voila: a really cool "Something"](/uploads/imported_attachments/YLJ3_Picture12.JPG "A few quick lines, Latticeizer, render in IDX Renditioner and, voila: a really cool "Something"")

Bob James

Once I got over the fun of trying latticeizer, I realized it had a very practical use for me:

My job involves design modifications for space vehicle launch facilities. In one of the facilities a launch vehicle is stacked vertically for testing prior to launch. That facility has several platforms that conform to the shape of the launch vehicle. Those platforms are made of steel ribbing with a steel plate welded to the top. Each platform may have a different size "hole" in it. Modeling these has been a chore: not a big chore, but time consuming. With Latticeizer the job becomes much easier.

The picture shows three phases of the modeling using latticizer:

Draw the 2D shape of the ribs
Run latticeizer
Put on a diamond no-slip pattern
Add fittings for folding
Duplicate it and flip it over

Unfortunately, latticeizer does not always work as expected. Sometimes the entire group just disappears, other times only parts of the group extrude and I spend a lot of time trying to "fix" it. One of the more benign examples is shown.

But, when it works it really is handy.

Picture 19.JPG

TIG

It's almost three years since latticeizer had any major changes... It was a bit buggy but I never looked to fix it 'cus no one asked... I'll review it and issue an update sometime...

Bob James

@tig said:

It was a bit buggy but I never looked to fix it 'cus no one asked... I'll review it and issue an update sometime...

I use it very often and would really appreciate an update: I've had as many failures as successes with it. It's soooo great when it works (but soooo frustrating when it does not).

I'm definitely "asking"

I've attached a "one off" I did this morning to show you a simplistic version of what I do "for real" at work.

That's my car in front, the Engineering Manager's car behind it and the IT Director's car in back. I'm the bald guy at the bottom

watkins

Dear Bob,

It is good to see that someone else in the space industry uses Sketchup. I get a lot of flak at work for using SU for concept designs. I'm supposed to use Inventor. I work on test facilities for the test and calibration of remote sensing instrumentation (terrestrial and planetary atmospheres), and have designed a few bits and pieces for space instruments too.