The verdict is in...
-
I agree with the client... the first two show the details "they" want to see.
-
ely..."shiny"? (Like Bytor said?)
Bytor...yeah, I know what you mean (I really do need to fight my preference for "loud" :`) How's this:
Fletch...I know, actually I agree for most porpuses. What do you think of something like this for a compromise:
Though I prefer these:
-
Tom,
The compromise images are now my fav!
The only other suggestion is to scale the chair material for more repeat in the pattern - the blotches are a little too distracting in the WC'd images. Really nice stuff though - very effective for the space.Bytor
-
So the short skirts are still sufficently suggestive...? (The extra layer of brush stroke does it for me in the interpretive ones :`) Good point about the chair material!
-
i m not an artist nor an arhitect but they looks a bit shiny IMO
edited :i m not an artist nor an arhitect but they looks a bit bright,IMO
-
the brush strokes are a bit unsettled in my opinion. thats why I would go for the more calm compromise.
-
It might just be me... but the floor on a couple of those images are burning my eyes when I look at them! I dunno... it might just be my monitor! Really nice images though...
-
but I warned you about it, Bubba, when you decided to buy this radioactive power screen!
now I could say "I told you so" - but today I don't want to
but I did bloody tell you!
-
They all look great, but I can see where your client would prefer the first two for their crispness and clarity of detail.
-
Ahhh next time I'll just throw my shades on!
-
Tom, I agree that the first 2 are clear and crisp.
The problem that I am having with all of the others is that, to me, it seems that you are getting caught up in making the images appear to be hand rendered in some pastel type style. By concentrating on the medium, you have lost the most important element of what makes a readable image: composition. For instance the one with the lady in purple. I just see her and nothing else. There isn't a visual path leading away and around the image. The one with the huge white space in the centre ends up being only about the white space. The values and colour use in the images have to be carefully thought out so that they play against one another. These seem to be all similar values but have a single area of such high contrast that you get stuck there. So the problem isn't really that the Pseudo-pastel medium isn't convincing, it is really the use of colour, value and positioning of objects.I do love that you are continuing to push the envelope on creaing these wonderful mock NPR media. Please don't take it amiss, but a crit is useless if it is just idle compliment.
-
WOW! Great and guiding comments! Already working on it...more later, thanks!
-
I have to agree with Susan's comments [although not as educated on the subject I have to say]. The second two in your first post are a bit in your face....
Susan, have you ever thought about collating a "do's and don't's list" for NPR imaging? I have searched for texts on the subject of composition, contrast, etc. but to no avail. I also am intrigued with your comment [The values and colour use in the images have to be carefully thought out so that they play against one another. ]...
Tom, i look forward to seeing your amended work... -
Thanks Andrew.
Truthfully, composition with respect to placement of objects, colour values and a myriad of other things is something that is studied for years in art schools. Even the most proficient artist doesn't get it "right" everytime. Generally setting up a scene is done in a serious of scribbly thunbnails first just to test for best positioning and then colours are scribbled in to test for values. No good piece (well few) arrives into the world straight from one's stream of consciousness. Artists spend a lot of time preplanning before they approach the final view and start to paint ( render).
That being said, there are a lot of places where this stuff is condensed into lists of do's and dont's. All the good information is in the lists but I think for someone coming upon them for the first time, it may be difficult to assimilate it all. Three pages of do's and dont's represents countless generations of advancements on the subject and people tend to look at them and not really "see, hear, digest". In Bonnie Roskes' book "Mastering Piranesi" I contributed a chapter, the longest chapter in the book actually, on the principles of composition and a series of critiques with respect to those pricnciples. I have at one time suggested to Bonnie that it may be a good idea for her to publish just that chapter as a PDF for sale alone. I would do it but I believe I gave up the rights to Bonnie when I gave it to her for her book. I'll look into it though.
There is really a lot of very good stuff on the internet regarding compositon and colour theory. I'll see if I can dig some of it up for you guys in the meantime.
-
Okay, here are some really really good links. The first one is a goldmine of information, goes on for 23 pages and it is FREE!
I tried to diversify so that there is input from a traditional artist and from a photographer. The final one is from a photographer who does bird photographs. Don't assume that he has nothing of relevance to say to you because you are not rendering birds. What he says applies universally to all compositions.
Hope you guys find this helpful.
http://photoinf.com/General/Johannes_Vloothuis/landscape_composition_rules.html
http://photoinf.com/General/Lee_Frost/The_Art_of_Composition_-_Landscape.htm
-
Thank you so much Susan, your input to this subject is invaluable.
I bought one of Bonnies books from SU version 4 I think and recall it being a great source of info. If you do look into whether you can publish the extract from Bonnies book, please let us know here, I'm sure there are many [including myself] that would benifit!!!.
Many thanks,Now, back on topic. Tom how are you going with the updated images?
-
thanks for the tips, susan. they are really invaluable.
-
Okay, finally...first, thanks for your continued interest: I hope to receive same on this one, thanks! This shows more clearly where I'm heading with this style and keeps pleasing me more as I refine. I think I have near reached the limit (sans sparks of genius and moments of divine intervention :`) of what I can do with fade filters and the random seeds of preset effects: time now to court some brushes and learn to paint. What do you think?
-
I still think you need something in the big yellow expanse in the centre. There is too much of it for the eye to carry on and leap towards the next "thing".
At this size it looks a little "fuzzy/mushy" but maybe printed at full size it wouldn't be so. Also I only have one lens in my glasses so maybe that is affecting my vision.
-
Susan...still may not carry for you, but I enhanced the image a bit to compensate for the small size (and left off the paper texture) then did some of the sheens and shadows brush work I was talking about to intensify the relationships between the hard points and lines around the open floor...which should (sometimes) lead your eye forground to background.
My lithos of so long ago (the inspiration for this style) were always more of a dance for the eye than a stroll...but obviously I haven't learned to make the CG instruments really sing...yet! :`)
Advertisement