sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. MrPlanet
    3. Topics
    Oops, your profile's looking a bit empty! To help us tailor your experience, please fill in key details like your SketchUp version, skill level, operating system, and more. Update and save your info on your profile page today!
    ⚠️ Important | Libfredo 15.6a introduces important bugfixes for Fredo's Extensions Update
    M
    Offline
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 24
    • Posts 235
    • Groups 1

    Topics

    • M

      Break on Command? (Impossible?)

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SketchyPhysics
      5
      0 Votes
      5 Posts
      573 Views
      S
      @unknownuser said: @sgt.a.johnson said: @unknownuser said: Is there a way for a fixed joint to be controlled, not tampered by any vehicle movements, but controlled so that it breaks on command? Most likely not as the breaking force box is white which means you can only enter raw value data not ruby I did not mean ruby.... i only meant a rig that would make it break on command of a key. Only thing i can think of is have a box on a servo/piston shoot out really quick and break the joint
    • M

      If Formulae (Help)

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SketchyPhysics
      4
      0 Votes
      4 Posts
      582 Views
      B
      Proper way to write it: if getVar("thrst")>=2000 then setVar("bthrst",1);end;
    • M

      Physics Components

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SketchyPhysics
      3
      0 Votes
      3 Posts
      531 Views
      C
      Sorry, I never did get it to work right. I have another idea I want to try out soon.
    • M

      SP3RC1 Bug : Mistaken Control

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SketchyPhysics
      4
      0 Votes
      4 Posts
      749 Views
      C
      I spent about 2hrs pouring over the code looking for what changed before I tried it in SP2 and found the bug was in that version too. Its servos that work ok with the values reversed. I could fix it pretty easy. But if I do it will break any existing models that happen to depend on that behavior.
    • 1
    • 2
    • 2 / 2