I am trying to check which plugins are enabled in the Preferences->Extensions menu. The following code seems like it should work to me (it asks for variables that are in the registry, the checked plugins have value 1 and the unchecked ones have value 0) but it doesn't work (at least on Windows with SU 7). Does anyone know if we are blocked from reading/writing to the Extensions preferences? Is there another way to check if another plugin is enabled?

ObjectSpace.each_object(SketchupExtension) do |p|
variable = "#{p.name}"
puts variable
puts Sketchup.read_default("Extensions", variable, nil)
variable = "#{p.name}#{p.version}"
puts variable
puts Sketchup.read_default("Extensions", variable, nil)
end

Thanks a lot,
Dan

After working with the SDK for a little while I don't think it can be wrapped as quickly as I first thought. I have to get back to work on my real tasks so the SDK wrap project will have to wait for a while. But I did make another example using SWIG with directors to show how to pass Ruby objects into C++ code. We are looking into this to implement Ruby observers for events that happen in our own C++ code.

Hope this helps,
Dan

Rename to .zip and extract

I started a project to wrap the SDK for Ruby at:

http://code.google.com/p/ruby-sketchup-sdk/

I am just getting started now and focusing only on Windows but hopefully this could be extended pretty quickly. Let me know if you are interested in helping/using.

Dan

This is very interesting, thanks for sharing, are there other command line arguments to SketchUp? SketchUp.exe --help, /?, etc just launches the program...

Dan

Sounds like there was enough interest in compiled extensions at Basecamp that I whipped up this small example. We have found the recipe of CMake + SWIG to be very useful in making cross-platform extensions (or any C++ project). I have only tested this example on Windows, I may have to update it for Mac, let me know if you have any problems with it. A great idea floated around at Basecamp was to wrap the C++ SDK for file access with Ruby, that way developers could write Ruby scripts to access skp files from within SketchUp or at the command line. I would suggest CMake + SWIG as a route to do that. As a final note, if you really don't like the generated interfaces you can always wrap the generated wrapper code from SWIG with your own pure Ruby to your heart's content.

The attached file is really a zip file, rename the file extension to .zip and extract.

Hope this helps,
Dan

Rename to .zip and extract

I have been looking around for an observer to fire when the active_model changes but haven't had any luck. Is there such a thing?

Well I guess I will have to get off my butt and post the answer to my own question:

# clear everything out
Sketchup.active_model.entities.clear!

# add the parent group
group1 = Sketchup.active_model.entities.add_group

# set parent’s transformation
group1.transformation = Geom;;Transformation.translation(Geom;;Point3d.new(10.m, 0, 0))

# add some points to the parent group
group1.entities.add_cpoint(Geom;;Point3d.new(0.m, 0.m, 0.m))
group1.entities.add_cpoint(Geom;;Point3d.new(5.m, 5.m, 3.m))

# add the child group
group2 = group1.entities.add_group

# set child’s transformation
group2.transformation = Geom;;Transformation.translation(Geom;;Point3d.new(0, 10.m, 0))

# add some points to the child group
group2.entities.add_cpoint(Geom;;Point3d.new(0.m, 0.m, 0.m))
group2.entities.add_cpoint(Geom;;Point3d.new(5.m, 5.m, 3.m))

# group transformations are now correct
puts Sketchup.active_model.active_path
puts group1.transformation.to_a.join(', ')
puts group2.transformation.to_a.join(', ')
puts Sketchup.active_model.edit_transform.to_a.join(', ')

# from top level
active_path = nil
group1.transformation = [1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 393.700787401575, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0]
group2.transformation = [1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 393.700787401575, 0.0, 1.0]
edit_transform = [1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0]

# open group1
active_path = [group1]
group1.transformation = [1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0]
group2.transformation = [1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 393.700787401575, 393.700787401575, 0.0, 1.0]
edit_transform = [1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 393.700787401575, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0]

# open group2
active_path = [group1, group2]
group1.transformation = [1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0]
group2.transformation = [1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0]
edit_transform = [1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 393.700787401575, 393.700787401575, 0.0, 1.0]

I guess a simple question is which component are you editing when you are editing group2 inside of group1? Are you editing group2, group1, or both?

Thanks ThomThom, do you have any information explaining edit_transform in more detail? In my case I have group1 with group2 inside of it. I sort of understand what this does when the active_path is '[group1]'. However, what happens when the active path is '[group1, group2]'? What I'm really after is some documentation like:

when active_path is '[]', group1.transformation returns xxx, group2.transformation returns yyy, active_model.edit_transform returns zzz
when active_path is '[group1]', group1.transformation returns xxx, group2.transformation returns yyy, active_model.edit_transform returns zzz
when active_path is '[group1, group2]', group1.transformation returns xxx, group2.transformation returns yyy, active_model.edit_transform returns zzz

I checked and have a similar problem. I have only been testing my extension in SketchUp on Windows and IRB on Windows/Mac. I'm going to look into it too and will post anything I find here.

Dan