sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. amanzi
    3. Topics
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info
    A
    Offline
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 3
    • Posts 9
    • Groups 1

    Topics

    • A

      Dynamic Component limitation or bug?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Dynamic Components sketchup
      4
      0 Votes
      4 Posts
      7k Views
      S
      It is now many years, later, the current version is SketchUp 2017, yet I'm still seeing the exact same issue with a complex dynamic component. The basic problem is that there are no global attributes in Dynamic Components: only local attributes that can be seen one level up and one level down in the hierarchy. I thought that this severe limitation could be bypassed by creating some lower level attributes the refer up to "parent!" attributes at a higher level, and others at higher levels that refer down to "child" attributes at lower levels, but it does not work. SketchUp does not traverse the entire hierarchy in both directions with each refresh or "redraw": it only seems to go down each branch once, so lower level attributes cannot be passed up one branch and down another. Thus, the ONLY option is what the original poster already discovered, years ago: calculate all attributes at the highest level, and then pass them down each branch. There's no way to reliably pass things back up again, nor to pass things between branches of the hierarchy. It's a great pity, as adding the simple functionality of global attributes would solve the problem entirely, and completely avoid the need to be passing things around between levels! Hopefully one day the SketchUp developers will figure out how to implement global attributes. Is this product even still being developed? There doesn't appear to have been any changes or updates to it at all, in YEARS! I have seen changes to the version number each year, but precious little in the way of new features, or even bug fixes. Is this a dead product? In the meantime, your solution is the only way that works.
    • A

      Transformation.to_a array definition

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Developers' Forum
      9
      0 Votes
      9 Posts
      651 Views
      Chris FullmerC
      Don't worry, nether did I. I found it on Wikipedia, but the math involved is a bit over my head for the time being. But in time I hope to get it figured out. Glad you got it working though, Chris
    • A

      "Lux Contour" coloring techniques

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Developers' Forum
      4
      0 Votes
      4 Posts
      585 Views
      A
      Thanks Adam - I am actually trying your program as you speak as an example of what the display could look like and it looks great but I am not looking for a lighting tool. My equivalent "lighting effect" is created by custom radiation functions that depend on the type of source, the distance from the source, and blockage and are not light sources. I am not lookig for photo realism but for a representation of intensity on surfaces. The essence of my question is: what technique could be used to color small portions of the Sketchup drawing? The resolution I am looking for is typically 30 cm square for drawings that are the size of a building. Is there some way to divide up each face of every entity and assign a color to it based on the result of my "radiation function" as the point. Perhaps this is part of the infrastructure you mention? Thanks for your help.
    • 1 / 1