[Plugin] TIG_Slicer v7
-
@TIG "When you look at a stack of horizontally sliced parts you see the top one first ? So that's number one ?"
The most basic task*: to make a Mass object representing high rise building and slice it from ground zero in the upward direction. Ridiculously primitive task was never possible with this tool
*- SU is mainly an architectural modeler, isn't it? -
OK, I give in. I'll add an option to name slices in Z upwards or downwards !
Do you also want to start slices at 0 or 1 because outside USA the 1st floor is the 2nd floor ! -
@TIG from zero (aka entrance floor, ground floor). or, in SU terms, from the object's Origin (typically at bottom left corner, though I always place at bottom center).
-
I think it's a good idea to have an option to pick the starting point in the model. You'd need a non-modal UI for this.
-
BUT in the USA the Ground floor is '1' - so I'll add that option...
-
maybe abandoning "floor" wording and using object's origin. plus option for Z Offset.
-
I'll stick with two extra options in Z slicing - Start Z ref at 0 or 1 - and - Z ref upwards - i.e. 'ground' = 0 or 1.
Of would you like Start Z ref to be something like -2 for 2 basements then the slices are -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, etc
Also would you like the ref to pas with leading zeroes as now ? or perhaps 01 not 001 ? or plain 1, 2, 3 etc -
Thanks for this update sir. I just gave it a test. It's amazingly fast.
FWIW, it works fine for me as it is.
-
Version 7.1 is now available.
https://sketchucation.com/pluginstore?pln=TIG_SlicerOperation is much as the previous versions, but with additional Dialog options added:
= add reference slices 'upwards' [Yes|No] - more logical when slicing a building massing model into floor plates.
= start reference at 0 or 1 - this covers some countries who use 1 for 'ground' floor [calling it 'first'], versus 1 for 'first' floor [meaning first 'upper' floor], thus it lets you start at 0 or 1 for the 'ground' floor to suit your local naming convention.
= reference labels are now auto-moved logically onto the 'top' face of each slice - positioned near bottom left corner, offset by thickness in X&Y, to minimize potential clashes and awkwardness, although of course it's possible to contrive a form that when sized has slices with insufficient face area that can't always nicely accommodate their entire label.Feedback here please.
-
@TIG Thank you very much!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better π
Register Login
Advertisement