Warhol esque?

[Bryan K]

Quite nice! You should post those in the main gallery.

[Mike Amos]

Altered views.

---

---

[Mike Amos]

Thanks mate, I had to correct the posted images, wrongy posted one. Running what I hope will be an image more worthy of the gallery. Mainly due to the scene orientation.

[tuna1957]

Nice work on the new images. I must be weird I really like the first image best

[Mike Amos]

Thanks mate, I know what you mean and I think it is just less cluttered. Full render in gallery section.

[Mike Amos]

I am lucky enough to have Maxwell render which I am slowly using to boil my brains.

This is the same scene, full textures but I am noticing some issues where textures get, lost or replaced and in one case there is a terry towel store box under the sink. A bit too odd even for me.

Hardware wise, denoising in Maxwell takes more oomph from the system which is demonstrated here by denoising not running at all but considering that this is still no more than render numbner 20 in Maxwell for me not too bad. No doubt it is very powerful but a paucity of good tutorial material in pdf and/or render tuts with a model running in stages to demonstrate methodd is held back in comparison to Twilight V2 pro. Twilight does more with fewer demands on the system/hardware and in my humble opinion, is just as good results wise for 90% of users.

The price difference is also, staggering.

---

[Bryan K]

Noise aside, that's a very good camera angle.

[Mike Amos]

Thanks mate, all good distraction.

[tuna1957]

Agree with Bryan, really light the viewpoint and lighting of this last shot. Even with the noise.

[Mike Amos]

Ta mate, getting a few more pointers today so movement is possible.