Teenager's room
-
So modeled in SU and material/lighting setup in Twilight Render then exported to KT to render?
Any reason not to complete the render in TW?
When I tried it (briefly) many years ago I found the output to be 'harsh' looking but it may have been a lack of time/commitment to properly learn the program. KT was a finer output but when clients wanted animations the time required to process a project was way too daunting. -
I am doing a couple of projects at the same time.
I can work on with SU while the other workstations do the renderings with KT
So I am free to work on my other projects.
-
This is a great idea.
Thank you passing this on - to use the best tools for the job. -
Sorry..thought I was all done..but have 2 more questions.
Do you re-import the KT rendered image back into TW to create the pano and are hotspots created in TW or in Pano2VR?
I'll say Thanks in advance. -
No no, it is very simple.
I do all settings in Twilight, then I make a special folder "kerky", to put the xml file and all the rest (pics, ies,...) inside. this is a one way folder. after Export everything with SU and TWL is done.
Then I open KT, open the xml. Then I render each scene, one after another. The output is allready equirectangular, because I have choosen "spherical" in twilght.
Be carful with layers. The xml stores the locations of the scenes but only the layers of the current scene.
-
In term of minutes time's render : Twillight is more /less than KT ?
-
Again, Thanks
It's been a while since I used KT but I will try it out on a small project. -
@pilou said:
In term of minutes time's render : Twillight is more /less than KT ?
rendertime should be the same. But the advantage is the independent renderengine. It can still render all night long at a seperate workstation and I can continue modelling in SU.
-
Thx for the infos!
-
Nobody noticed the pop up screen !
-
@psylo said:
Nobody noticed the pop up screen !
I was also confused. No idea what happend to that notebook. I will never use it again.
Advertisement