sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    How to create a face with a hole touching its edge?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Developers' Forum
    13 Posts 5 Posters 417 Views 5 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • tt_suT Offline
      tt_su
      last edited by

      @icehuli said:

      But this does not work.

      How does it not work? Errors? Unexpected result?

      Got a snippet of what you got so far?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • icehuliI Offline
        icehuli
        last edited by

        @tt_su said:

        @icehuli said:

        But this does not work.

        How does it not work? Errors? Unexpected result?

        Got a snippet of what you got so far?

        I executed the following code:

        When f2 does NOT touch f1, I get the face with a hole as I expected, see the attached new figure
        e = Sketchup.active_model.entities f1 = e.add_face [1,1,0],[8,1,0],[4,5,0] f2 = e.add_face [2,2,0],[%(#0000FF)[**6**],2,0],[4,4,0] f2.erase!

        When f2 does touch f1, I can not get the face with a hole. A hole is not subtracted from f1.
        e = Sketchup.active_model.entities f1 = e.add_face [1,1,0],[8,1,0],[4,5,0] f2 = e.add_face [2,2,0],[%(#0000FF)[**7**],2,0],[4,4,0] f2.erase!


        twofaces_erased.PNG

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • TIGT Offline
          TIG Moderator
          last edited by

          Always add the inner face, and then add the outer face.
          Then the inner face should erase as you hope. πŸ€“

          TIG

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • tt_suT Offline
            tt_su
            last edited by

            @tig said:

            Always add the inner face, and then add the outer face.
            Then the inner face should erase as you hope. πŸ€“

            Tried that, didn't work for me.

            I also tried to intersect; group & explode; nuffin' worked. The dark force is string with this geometry.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • icehuliI Offline
              icehuli
              last edited by

              strong dark force !!! 😑

              Another case does not work!

              I can not get the correct offset of the left polygon. The hole is not empty in Sketchup.


              twofaces_erased.PNG

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S Offline
                slbaumgartner
                last edited by

                @tt_su said:

                @tig said:

                Always add the inner face, and then add the outer face.
                Then the inner face should erase as you hope. πŸ€“

                Tried that, didn't work for me.

                I also tried to intersect; group & explode; nuffin' worked. The dark force is string with this geometry.

                Works when you draw on the GUI in the order TIG suggests, but I also can't get it to work via Ruby. Where are the Jedi when we need them?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • TIGT Offline
                  TIG Moderator
                  last edited by

                  Try making the inner face then using find_faces on the added outer edges, rather than making that face directly.
                  Then the inner face should then be retained for erase!, and the outer one remains as a loop.

                  The reason your API 'offset' leaves a hole and SketchUp doesn't is [I suspect] along these lines too...

                  TIG

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • icehuliI Offline
                    icehuli
                    last edited by

                    @tig said:

                    Try making the inner face then using find_faces on the added outer edges, rather than making that face directly.
                    Then the inner face should then be retained for erase!, and the outer one remains as a loop.

                    The reason your API 'offset' leaves a hole and SketchUp doesn't is [I suspect] along these lines too...

                    Hi TIG,

                    I am not sure I understand you well. Could you post the code, that how exactly should I do it? Thanks in advance!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • jolranJ Offline
                      jolran
                      last edited by

                      That's a bug. Won't intersect either.

                      I wonder if it's related to this problem.. Some funny thing going on here,
                      although this is done by hand.

                      Face is recognized somehow although deleted..


                      materialVanish.jpg

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jolranJ Offline
                        jolran
                        last edited by

                        πŸ‘

                        Not too much code either.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • icehuliI Offline
                          icehuli
                          last edited by

                          @tig said:

                          Try making the inner face then using find_faces on the added outer edges, rather than making that face directly.
                          Then the inner face should then be retained for erase!, and the outer one remains as a loop.

                          The reason your API 'offset' leaves a hole and SketchUp doesn't is [I suspect] along these lines too...

                          GREAT!!!! You are the Jedi!!! 😍

                          so the code is:
                          e = Sketchup.active_model.entities f1 = e.add_face [1,1,0],[8,1,0],[4,5,0] f2 = e.add_face [2,2,0],[7,2,0],[4,4,0] ed = f1.edges[0] f1.erase! ed.find_faces; f2.erase!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • icehuliI Offline
                            icehuli
                            last edited by

                            Some observations.....
                            The sketchup offset tool is not consistent. It does not always provide the same result....sometime gives the left, sometime gives the right.
                            They are slightly different.
                            Both results have two faces, a bigger face and a small one(the hole).
                            The bigger face is selected in both results, while the small one is not selected.
                            On the left, the small one is separated from the bigger face, i.e. the bigger face contains a hole.
                            On the right, the small one is overlapped with the bigger face, i.e. the bigger face does not contain a hole.
                            .......


                            offset_diff.PNG

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • 1 / 1
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Buy SketchPlus
                            Buy SUbD
                            Buy WrapR
                            Buy eBook
                            Buy Modelur
                            Buy Vertex Tools
                            Buy SketchCuisine
                            Buy FormFonts

                            Advertisement