Did a God or Gods create the universe? EDITED
-
Actually, the cargo cults do raise a serious point about the formation of belief systems. We find them amusing...but only because (as in the case of Prince Philip) we still have the man to compare with the myth. Who's to say that many of the myths in all the great religions didn't start in exactly the same way? Naive islanders or equally naive people millenia ago. None of us has the automatic right to feel intellectually superior.
Whatever the truth, it only explains the theologies. It has nothing to do with the question of whether or not god exists. It's not inconsistent for Hawking to believe in a creator (not saying categorically he does), even if we do solve all the physicality questions regarding the universe.
That's why I don't consider myself an atheist.
-
Our god is the best!!!!
Before everyone takes it to serious.
Great Dutch satire on this topic.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7adi7OMaWnA
Bep
-
Who is conscious,
chooses the true God,
because only He gives us assurance of salvation,
eternal life,
and changes in our present lives. -
@unknownuser said:
Good points Tom. In retrospect I probably shouldn't have lumped you in with Pete, but I did think that you were attempting to pick up the argument in his stead as he'd not yet responded.
Oh, I was. But only to a certain degree. I don't agree with Pete's conclusion. Though I think I share his fears.
@unknownuser said:
It makes it so much easier and more satisfying to argue when both sides can concede that the other side has some valid points.
Yeah, it does.
@unknownuser said:
Satan, I believe, is real.
@unknownuser said:
As an atheist, I guess you don't mean that literally. But in what sense do you mean it?
I meant that there's incredibily evil people out there. I was specifically thinking of Joseph Kony.
@unknownuser said:
@unknownuser said:
I said "War on Terror", and I didn't call it Christian - I said there was a a certain religious component to it.
Fair enough. Are you simply referring to the Islamic terrorist aspect or are you referring to something on our side.
Both. In the case of the US, it was mainly the rhetorics. 'Crusade', 'evil', 'evildoer' - whilst not uncommon words, they have a certain, well, patina. Seems to me the Bush administration attempted to use the christian identity of the US to make their plans go down easier. I think.
@unknownuser said:
bat-crap crazy evil.
This is just in:
"Pope Benedict XVI denounced gay marriage in his annual “State of the World” address Monday, going so far as to say the same-sex nuptials threaten the future of humanity.
In the speech, the pope, 84, unleashed what some consider being his strongest tirade against gay marriage, saying it is among conventions that “undermine the family” and “threaten human dignity and the future of humanity itself,” Reuters reported."
-
@unknownuser said:
This is just in:
"Pope Benedict XVI denounced gay marriage in his annual “State of the World” address Monday, going so far as to say the same-sex nuptials threaten the future of humanity.
In the speech, the pope, 84, unleashed what some consider being his strongest tirade against gay marriage, saying it is among conventions that “undermine the family” and “threaten human dignity and the future of humanity itself,” Reuters reported."
That's precisely the sort of thing I'm talking about. Of all the sins that might end humanity...you pick that? Not hatred, not greed, not pride, envy, oppression...nope, homosexuality, that'll do us all in. At least now we know we won't have to worry about thermal nuclear war clearing us all out, all we have to worry about now is...I guess everyone turning gay and no children being born? That wouldbe a far more disappointing end to humanity, just sort of fizzling out like that.
-Brodie
-
Erm, I'm not the one obsessing over homosexuality - it was the guy in the dress.
Wait ... I misunderstood. Right?
-
@unknownuser said:
Erm, I'm not the one obsessing over homosexuality - it was the guy in the dress.
Wait ... I misunderstood. Right?
Ya, I was just ranting that this is the sort of thing (within the Christian church - in the broadest sense of the term) which irritates me in that it gives us all a bad name I think. On this point, you atheists are lucky. You have far fewer crazy folks screwing over your own side to contend with.
-Brodie
-
Nah, there's plenty of those as well.
Edit: well, I know at least one. A sexuologist whom I once had dinner with. Very, very anti religion, in a rather unpleasant irrational way.
-
@unknownuser said:
Nah, there's plenty of those as well.
Oh, you've got your share but I think going by shear numbers I think we both know who'd win in a crazy contest.
-
You keep talking on this pointless conversation.
Avoiding answer my comments or some other's ones.
Still egoists all of you, still believing in your personal god.
Nothing weird here. Just predictable.
But when we're talking about God, I really don't care about how your personal god looks like. It's you and You only.
Especially Pete, who seems that he's the only true believer here. lol
But remember, we're trying to communicate. We're just human beings, alone, under a vast world.
My experience shows me that some architects and constructors are the most egoists I've met.
The equivalent of the great architect of the universe or something similar.
Good luck to all of us. -
@michaliszissiou said:
You keep talking on this pointless conversation.
Avoiding answer my comments or some other's ones.
Still egoists all of you, still believing in your personal god.
Nothing weird here. Just predictable.
But when we're talking about God, I really don't care about how your personal god looks like. It's you and You only.
Especially Pete, who seems that he's the only true believer here. lol
But remember, we're trying to communicate. We're just human beings, alone, under a vast world.
My experience shows me that some architects and constructors are the most egoists I've met.
The equivalent of the great architect of the universe or something similar.
Good luck to all of us.I'm not quite sure who you're talking to or what you're saying.
-Brodie
-
@solo said:
@unknownuser said:
Especially Pete, who seems that he's the only true believer here.
..erm, you mean non-believer right?
Actually I may be the most stubborn and the least willing to listen.
In my defense I can also say that I was once a born again Christian openly 'making fishers of men' for many years with a very radical non-denominational bunch called the 'Church of Christ', I also studied the bible for seven years while with them, so I honestly can say I came to my own conclusions and do not make my stances on ignorance.
Was that in Texas as well Pete? As in the ICOC?
-Brodie
-
@solo said:
No, Johannesburg, but yes ICOC JHB.
Ah, I'm a member of the ICOC actually. It certainly did screw up a lot of folks back then (not so long ago). The church where I was converted was actually in a pretty good place but I've heard lots of bad stories and experienced some degree of that. Would you say the...rigidity, shall we say, contributed to your becoming an atheist or was it something else?
-Brodie
-
@solo said:
In my defense I can also say that I was once a born again Christian openly 'making fishers of men' for many years with a very radical non-denominational bunch called the 'Church of Christ', I also studied the bible for seven years while with them, so I honestly can say I came to my own conclusions and do not make my stances on ignorance.
‘Solo’, something is wrong!
Who was TRULY “born again”, that person can not lose the faith/trust in God, can not lose salvation of God...! It is impossible something like that...! -
-
@unknownuser said:
‘Solo’, something is wrong!
Who was TRULY “born again”, that person can not lose the faith/trust in God, can not lose salvation of God...! It is impossible something like that...!Oh... Cornel....
-
@solo said:
Hmmm, there were many factors, one was the studying of the bible, just seemed that they were interpreting it to suit their flavor, I had many questions that I felt was intercepted with lame and unfulfilled answers. Then there was the tithe, taken very seriously to a point that it felt more like a tax and them like spiritual mafia.
The whole 'making fishers of men' thing also got too much after a while as we were required to do some real tough stuff like administering to total strangers in malls, outside nightclubs on Saturday nights, invite total strangers to study the bible with a push/goal to get them baptized and into the 'flock' (more like tithe paying members)
It all seemed like one huge scam.I was raised a baptist, grandfather was a reverend and my dad in South Africa is now a preacher in his church, so coming to my convictions was difficult and did cause many heartaches within my family. I am much happier now and totally convinced I am correct, almost like being blind and suddenly seeing (stealing a quote from the bible), the fog of Christianity can be blinding but once you see the truth you feel silly for actually believing all that crap.
Very interesting. I find it fascinating that we've had a number of similar experiences and, in fact, seem to have a lot of the same opinions on what's wrong in the church, and yet we've reached such different conclusions. I've seen that same issue of people having questions which have gone unanswered - particularly before they're Christians. I haven't personally experienced the pressure to tithe although I've heard that was an issue in the past in many ICOC churches. I believe evangelism is important but I agree that the focus and method is flawed and haven't participated in the sorts of things you're referring to.
So we have many of the same frustrations. And I did go through a period not long ago where I struggled with a lot of questions. But these weren't so much questions about God, but rather about the church. Why do you suppose we faced similar situations and came to question different things because of them?
I do wonder what you're referring to regarding interpreting the Bible to suit their flavor. Can you explain that a bit more?
How is your family with your decision at this point?
-Brodie
-
Those who are saved (“born again”), are given by the Father in the care of His Son, the Lord, and He said:
“All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will by no means cast out. For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me. This is the will of the Father who sent Me, that of all He has given Me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day.” (John 6:37-39)The Lord Jesus Christ does not lose any, because He DOES the will of the Father!
‘Solo’, it means that you actually have no a clear definition of expresion “BORN AGAIN”..., in a biblical way!
-
When architects have time to waste on arguing the merits (pro and con) of religion you can tell the economy has not yet turned the corner.
-
@unknownuser said:
Those who are saved (“born again”), are given by the Father in the care of His Son, the Lord, and He said:
“All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will by no means cast out. For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me. This is the will of the Father who sent Me, that of all He has given Me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day.” (John 6:37-39)The Lord Jesus Christ does not lose any, because He DOES the will of the Father!
‘Solo’, it means that you actually have no a clear definition of expresion “BORN AGAIN”..., in a biblical way!
In what sense is this helpful, Cornel? You're talking about a doctrine which many Christians don't even buy into. In what sense could it possibly be worth bringing up to someone who doesn't believe in God, much less salvation?
-Brodie
Advertisement