sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    โ„น๏ธ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    Did a God or Gods create the universe? EDITED

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Corner Bar
    898 Posts 56 Posters 13.8k Views 56 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • StinkieS Offline
      Stinkie
      last edited by

      As for the -rather fundamental- difference between science and religion, this is pretty much how I see it:

      Science:

      *Given x works as expected, theory y, for the time being, seems, at least in part, valid.

      Stay tuned.*

      Religion:

      *There's stuff. Someone must've made it. Some bloke. Did it in six days, too. Pretty impressive, that. Must be able to do anything. Not like us humans. But then he isn't human. Can't be. Just look at what he can do!

      At some point, he did get it on with a human woman. Get this: didn't lay a finger on her, and he still managed to knock her up. Transcendent sperm, baby! Anyway, the son. He's our saviour.

      Yeah. From what? Pretty much all the mental attributes his dad gave us. Why'd he given them to us then? Well, the thing you got to understand is, he moves in mysterious ways. Which is fancy speak for: we're to dumb to figure out what he's up to.

      Oh yeah: he can do backflips and create solar systems at the same time.

      Who's your daddy? WHO IS YOUR DADDY?*

      Now I should really do the dishes.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • andybotA Offline
        andybot
        last edited by

        @unknownuser said:

        we're to dumb to figure out what he's up to.

        Oh yeah: he can do backflips and create solar systems at the same time.

        Who's your daddy? WHO IS YOUR DADDY?[/i]

        so name calling and sarcasm will work where rational discussion doesn't? I guess that makes your points that much more valid. ๐Ÿ˜’

        http://charlottesvillearchitecturalrendering.com/

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • StinkieS Offline
          Stinkie
          last edited by

          Lighten up, it was a joke. Besides, I have made a handful of rational points, haven't I?

          This all being said, I have no objections against removing my sarcastic post (yes, there's sarcasm in there - but name-calling?) if people find it insulting. Just let me know.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • andybotA Offline
            andybot
            last edited by

            ... gallop gallop gallop...

            I suppose I agree generally with your points, but you are coming across super snarky. I still consider "dumb" to be name calling, but eh, well, pick your battles.

            http://charlottesvillearchitecturalrendering.com/

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • HieruH Offline
              Hieru
              last edited by

              @unknownuser said:

              It's pretty mind boggling, particularly when you get into the notion of observation affecting the outcome.

              From what I understand the observation factor is merely the most popular hypothesis. There's been on a lot of woo built on that shaky foundation. The same goes for Schrรถdinger's cat, which was initially intended as a piece of satire.

              www.davidhier.co.uk

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • StinkieS Offline
                Stinkie
                last edited by

                @ andybot
                You have a point. I do have a polemical streak. I'll try and keep it less snarky. As for the 'we' that are 'too dumb' - I'm in that group, aren't I?

                Whilst I obviously cannot tell theists how they should feel about what I wrote, they might possibly find some solace in the fact that I am by no means opposed to their right to believe in whatever they choose to.

                @solo said:

                @unknownuser said:

                Lighten up, it was a joke. Besides, I have made a handful of rational points, haven't I?

                Yes you have and so have Alan and Tig to name a few, however I have not noticed any rational debate from the pro God crew, is this because you cannot rationally defend fairy tales, lies and stupidity?

                Unless bible passage regurgitation and dogma is a defense I clearly see a winner.

                Stop leading me into temptation! ๐Ÿ’š

                Dishes!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • andybotA Offline
                  andybot
                  last edited by

                  @solo said:

                  Unless bible passage regurgitation and dogma is a defense I clearly see a winner.

                  ๐Ÿ˜†
                  pass the popcorn, hold the dishes... let's see how the true believers respond!

                  http://charlottesvillearchitecturalrendering.com/

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jason_marantoJ Offline
                    jason_maranto
                    last edited by

                    I guess I wasn't clear as to why I am distracted -- I am on a deadline and I have a complex software to teach so my mental focus is elsewhere... I cannot go blow for blow with every point made so I was speaking in basic generalizations to at least put it out there. I am also not inclined to allow myself to get drawn in by the more mean-spirited qualities of this conversation as I am prone to become a rather big bastard when pushed... and while I have no doubt I could silence the critics with enough time and energy, I have neither. And anyway ultimately it may not open any hearts, and in fact may have the outcome of further hardening hearts.

                    So since, I don't have the time or energy to see this through properly at this point and rather than do a half-way job I'm excusing myself. Since I never come to this section of the forum and only found this yesterday because Jeff mentioned it in the gallery and I was curious... you should not miss my contribution.

                    Suffice to say I am a believer -- and I find less incongruity between "science" and the Bible than you do -- but I also allow for more things than you do as possible, so I am not limiting myself to only discussing what we currently know as "fact".

                    I honestly do hope you find peace -- the alternative is not very pretty and it is completely needless to end up that way due to the Grace of God... nothing is needed but faith.

                    As a last aside: Gravity is a bit of sticky subject because while we do "appear" to have a handle on this subject here, when you get down to the quantum level things get much stranger in relation to gravity -- this is one of the things which string theory attempts to resolve ( as one of the purported theories of everything). However there are several competing ideas being thrown out that either downgrade or completely discard the theory of general relativity... so it is not so cut and dry. But again as I say I do not have the time or energy to dig into these subjects properly for the next 8 weeks.

                    Now I must attempt to successfully try to pry myself away from this distraction and get back to work.

                    Best,
                    Jason.

                    I create video tutorial series about several 2D & 3D graphics programs.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • StinkieS Offline
                      Stinkie
                      last edited by

                      @jason_maranto said:

                      (...) and while I have no doubt I could silence the critics with enough time and energy, I have neither.

                      [trying not be too snarky] I'll gladly wait until you find both. Please do consider this an invitation. [/trying not be too snarky]

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T Offline
                        tomsdesk
                        last edited by

                        Maybe it's time to stop:

                        Image1.jpg

                        http://www.tomsdesk.moonfruit.com/
                        2.5D Trees & Shrubs!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • andybotA Offline
                          andybot
                          last edited by

                          Some parting thoughts, since I have some work to do too, thankfully.
                          Like Pete said, Jesus was a radical socialist. He turned political and religious structures on their heads. But that's the point, Jesus operates in the human faith and relationship realm, not the scientific realm, and to conflate the two is pointless. IMHO

                          http://charlottesvillearchitecturalrendering.com/

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • StinkieS Offline
                            Stinkie
                            last edited by

                            ๐Ÿ˜†

                            But whose reply was the 666th? Ah! ๐Ÿ’š

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • MarianM Offline
                              Marian
                              last edited by

                              @jason_maranto said:

                              ... and while I have no doubt I could silence the critics with enough time and energy, I have neither.

                              I'm also rather curious on how you are gonna do what no one else on Earth managed to do concerning this subject. I'm gonna watch this space.

                              http://marian87.deviantart.com/

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • StinkieS Offline
                                Stinkie
                                last edited by

                                No, you're not. ๐Ÿ˜„ The winner, I mean.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Alan FraserA Offline
                                  Alan Fraser
                                  last edited by

                                  You guys do know that the number of the beast is actually 616, right?
                                  Or you can try 01562 55789....that's the fax no. of the beast. ๐Ÿ˜‰

                                  3D Figures
                                  Were you required to walk 500 miles? Were you advised to walk 500 more?
                                  You could be entitled to compensation. Call the Pro Claimers now!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • D Offline
                                    Dropout
                                    last edited by

                                    @solo said:

                                    Funny thing is if he was around today the exact folk that worship him would hate his social liberal ways and he'd be dismissed and persecuted...oh wait he was back then also.....hmmmm.

                                    A point that most believers tend to miss.

                                    When you critique the current North American view of Christianity you are critiquing a caricature of what following Christ really means.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Rich O BrienR Offline
                                      Rich O Brien Moderator
                                      last edited by

                                      What I do notice about this thread is that non believers are very supportive of others statements. Whilst believers are largely left unsupported or have separate ideas. Understandable considering the amount of variants to follow.

                                      I do think both Brodie and Jason have a firm grasp on their faith and I commend them for taking the time to share that belief. Whether you agree with it or not.

                                      On such a divisive subject it's nice to see a wholesome debate as such.

                                      Has any believer questioned their thinking after reading the non believer responses?

                                      Download the free D'oh Book for SketchUp ๐Ÿ“–

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • StinkieS Offline
                                        Stinkie
                                        last edited by

                                        @unknownuser said:

                                        I do think both Brodie and Jason have a firm grasp on their faith and I commend them for taking the time to share that belief.

                                        Agreed.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Rich O BrienR Offline
                                          Rich O Brien Moderator
                                          last edited by

                                          I'm not seeing Cornel's posts since he doesn't see my questions

                                          Download the free D'oh Book for SketchUp ๐Ÿ“–

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • MarianM Offline
                                            Marian
                                            last edited by

                                            @unknownuser said:

                                            Has any believer questioned their thinking after reading the non believer responses?

                                            I doubt that Rich. Both believers and non belivers alike think they are right but only one group thinks they hold the absolute knowledge, truth and righteousness.

                                            http://marian87.deviantart.com/

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 29
                                            • 30
                                            • 31
                                            • 32
                                            • 33
                                            • 44
                                            • 45
                                            • 31 / 45
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Buy SketchPlus
                                            Buy SUbD
                                            Buy WrapR
                                            Buy eBook
                                            Buy Modelur
                                            Buy Vertex Tools
                                            Buy SketchCuisine
                                            Buy FormFonts

                                            Advertisement