WWII aircraft dimensioning question.
-
@numbthumb said:
@roger said:
What would make you think that?
Oh,just a hunch
This in fact: http://www.network54.com/Forum/149674/message/1317706027/Help+Need+info+ASAP,+Curtiss+blueprints+---Mixed+fractional+and+decimal+dimensioning--Why-Special agent numbthumb.
-
At your service
Knowing how much details went into El Tigre, I really hope you´re planning on modeling that Flying Tiger. It would make a terrific model. -
@roger said:
What would make you think that?
Oh, just a hunch
This in fact: http://www.network54.com/Forum/149674/message/1317706027/Help+Need+info+ASAP,+Curtiss+blueprints+---Mixed+fractional+and+decimal+dimensioning--Why- -
@numbthumb said:
At your service
Knowing how much details went into El Tigre, I really hope you´re planning on modeling that Flying Tiger. It would make a terrific model.I am on my way to Thailand to meet up with a college friend whose father was a photographer with the American Volunteer Group of the Flying Tigers. He spent about 1,000 hours modeling a P40. I think I will not do any physical building myself.
-
It looks like WWII and its high accuracy / high volume production was a tipping point between the low tech world and a high tech world. Planes designed at the beginning of the war were done on Inch fractions down to 1/32 or 1/64. However, anything done outside that fraction world was done in decimals. But it was not long before everyone went decimal. And finally, the hand held calculator put the final decimal nail in the fractional coffin.
-
Here's more boring trivia...
WWII caused aviation to make a 25 year leap in 9 years. After the war USA identified that airspace had changed forever. They held the Chicago Convention whereby 52 countries (Allies) agreed to operate commercial aviation under one common standard. Whether manufacturing or maintaing an aircraft it abides to the same principals.
The US realised that the end of the war meant lots of pilots, airfields and airplanes would be useful for commercial transport. What's interesting from all this it that no matter what aircraft you work on it's maintenance manual chapters are the same. So repairing a Boeing structure is Chapter 52 or repairing a Cessna structure is Chapter 52. In essence, a mechanic/technician in aviation should be able maintain any aircraft according to these basic principals.
I need a life
-
Rich, it is neither boring nor trivia. It is a fascinating insight into the dynamic relationships in history. But then, I think you knew that.
-
@roger said:
I am on my way to Thailand to meet up with a college friend whose father was a photographer with the American Volunteer Group of the Flying Tigers. He spent about 1,000 hours modeling a P40. I think I will not do any physical building myself.
Any chances to see that model? Do you happen to have any pics of it, or are there any available on the internet?
-
I will send an email and see if I can get a copy to post. I am not sure if the model still exists. It could have been destroyed or lost in a move, but I will ask.
-
Thanks!
-
Sad news folks the plane was stomped by a former spouse. Se la vie. But the good news is I will be able to show some photos one of these days.
-
And sadly, instead of modeling I am going blind entering almost invisible data into a spread sheet so I can model, model model instead of read/model, read/model, read/model.
"Accountants and grocers, they weigh everything." --Zorba the Greek from the movie "Never on a Sunday"
Advertisement