sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    Scale non-uniform along vector?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Developers' Forum
    22 Posts 4 Posters 1.8k Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • TIGT Offline
      TIG Moderator
      last edited by

      the group is from its untransformed bounds [from a temporary instance of it added to the face.parent.entities].

      You know how long the 'edge' is [edge.length] so you can work out the ratio of the two values...
      Now you can use that to scale the group.entities with a scaling-transformation along the xaxis only... and thereby the original group is scaled as needed.
      Erase the temporary instance of the group to tidy up...

      TIG

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jolranJ Offline
        jolran
        last edited by

        Yeah, thanks TIG. All what you say is true.

        All these transformations got my head spinning. So I ditched the scaling in the tilingmethod. Went with scaling(y in this case) at ORIGIN, just after loading the component. Before placing it on the face. Not as flexible as in a method, but it will hopefully work. I think Dan suggested something similar, earlier on in this thread.

        Maybe that's what you had in mind all along as well, TIG. I just coulden't see it then..

        Edit: When I reread you thread, did you mean to scale entities and that would become a "local" scale? Cause i did some scaling in x or y and it was in fact a global scale. The group moved from the face and tilted, even when putting the origin at center of bbox. I can't recall 100% sure if it was the group OR the entities I scaled. Ah heck. I'll try tomorrow then.. Like I said, rather had this transformation separate in the tiling method..

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • 1
        • 2
        • 2 / 2
        • First post
          Last post
        Buy SketchPlus
        Buy SUbD
        Buy WrapR
        Buy eBook
        Buy Modelur
        Buy Vertex Tools
        Buy SketchCuisine
        Buy FormFonts

        Advertisement