sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    Modelling effiency, reducing file size

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SketchUp Discussions
    sketchup
    21 Posts 6 Posters 756 Views 6 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • brodieB Offline
      brodie
      last edited by

      I think I see what you're talking about now. Running another test with 25 spheres I found that using a projection map created a file that was 1.3mb smaller than the same file with the same texture applied to the sphere with a non-projection map (not Whaat's sphere uv, but just the generic sloppy SU mapping) and both files were significantly larger in size than just adding the geometry plus the image files size.

      What I'm still not seeing is SU preserving UV coordinates on an object after a texture has been removed. If I create a bunch of spheres I get a file of 2.0mb, map them with a 50kb image and I get a 4.3mb file. Apply the default material to all the spheres and the file size drops back to just over 2.0mb and running thomthom's cleaner brings it all the way back to original size.

      -Brodie

      steelblue http://www.steelbluellc.com

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • 1
      • 2
      • 2 / 2
      • First post
        Last post
      Buy SketchPlus
      Buy SUbD
      Buy WrapR
      Buy eBook
      Buy Modelur
      Buy Vertex Tools
      Buy SketchCuisine
      Buy FormFonts

      Advertisement