[Plugin] OBJexporter v3.0 20130131
-
Thanks, TIG.
-
As a user of SU's free version I thank you TIG, for this VERY helpful plugin! I had forgotten about it and the other day someone suggested I try it (a while ago I PMed TIG asking about it when in another thread he had mentioned he was working on it).
I tried it out and I have to say that based on what I used it for it seems to work BETTER than SU's native obj exporter! Thank you very much for spending your valuable time and efforts on making and sharing so many brilliant plugins. In this terrible economy many of us can not afford even the simplest things and these gifts of yours are priceless to those of us on a tight budget.
Thanks! -
Nice plugin. It does work to get SketchUp Free models into Unity3D. At work I have SketchUp Pro with good FBX export, but at home, for the kids, I am learning them to use the free version of SketchUp. This is a good script, although with some models there are waaay to many materials. I assume that the UV mapping is the culprit. But I can not complain, as this was a model from the 3D Warehouse.
-
@stefkeb said:
Nice plugin. It does work to get SketchUp Free models into Unity3D. At work I have SketchUp Pro with good FBX export, but at home, for the kids, I am learning them to use the free version of SketchUp. This is a good script, although with some models there are waaay to many materials. I assume that the UV mapping is the culprit. But I can not complain, as this was a model from the 3D Warehouse.
OBJexporter creates one material & texture file for each material.
If that material has UV mapping it should only make the one file and map it within the code BUT if a texture has been UV mapped AND distorted then there insufficient points on a triangular face to cope so it makes a duplicated material using a distorted texture image file and normal mapping in lieu. The Pro exporter does a similar thing. If you have several distorted textures then you get one extra material for each one. It is possible to have a textured material that looks virtually the same as one that's not been mapped, BUT if there is the slightest distortion you will get a duplicated distorted material being exported... If you want to attach or PM the SKP [or point to the actual file] then I can check it out too....
-
Here's v1.5
http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=294844#p294844
It addresses a 'smooth-normal' issue where smoothed surfaces weren't getting exported properly. -
Thank you for the update!!
-
Thanks for this great plugin. Way better than Sketchup OBj Export.
I have one request, is it possible to also export back faces that have a color or material, and not those that don't? Say, instead of creating a new face for the back like SKP export do, can yours assing a new OBJ command? For example...
usemtl White
bf 9/9/9 10/10/10 11/11/11bf for backface!
That way, we can load the obj and detect any back faces as oppose to treat them as a new face and have duplicate triangles!
I don't know if I make any sense?
Thanks
-
Alienizer
The Pro OBJ exporter has a 'two-sided' face option BUT when you bring these into many app's the faces 'fight' as they are coplanar.
What happens is each face is effectively duplicated and one is reversed with the Back material applied to it.
An OBJ file must use 'f' to define a face, there's no 'bf' coding...
I've no plans to make a 2-sided version any time soon...I suspect that you actually want a quick and lazy way to fix a sloppily modeled SKP, where you have some reversed faces with materials on their backs instead of their fronts...
I have already written the very tool to fix that for you - 'FixReversedFaceMaterials' - it flips any faces with materials only on their backs and sorts out the material's mapping back onto the 'now-correctly-oriented-face' front etc... Read this and then download the script http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=264134#p264134 
-
Great! Thank you. I will use your other tool. What about a face with 2 materials where front and back are visible, say, the back is visible from a mirror when rendered?
FYI I found a simple model that does not convert properly. All faces are oriented correctly and it export fine with SKP obj export...
http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/details?mid=b4b51fe2bdeeeedf56c58b78d29fd8a9&prevstart=24Thanks again TIG
-
An OBJ file contains data for a face with a material.
If you want a back material you must make a second face that's reversed.
As most renderers etc expect 'solid' objects it is wise to model your SKP this way - e.g. make a window glass with two outward facing faces ~10mm apart as it would be in the real world [there are never 'single planes' in reality - all things, no matter how thin they are, have two faces each with a front, not one face with a front and a back!]I am testing your problem Allosaurus SKP - it is complex with over 800,000 lines of code in the OBJ file. The OBJexporter isn't foolproof - I'll try to see where it might be failing...
-
I found that my OBJexporter did make a correct OBJ version - which imported OK into other packages. It took ages to finish and the OBJ file was 22Mb! The Pro OBJ exporter is quicker because it's compiled etc... BUT mine is 'free'
There is a problem with my old clunky OBJimporter - it will import some of the faces flipped - it's an issue with smoothed normals.***
I suggest you try this quite new and free 'compiled' OBJimporter - it is much faster, and after some initial tweaking this version is now stable and it gave me a perfect re-import back into a SKP of Allo'... see here http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=316470#p316470 - read the thread to see how it's evolved... It could probably do with some better reporting in the Status-Bar, but otherwise I like it...
***As we now have this free 'compiled' OBJ 'FluidImporter', I probably won't bother doing any more work on my clunky version...
-
I know you are right, and I do make my models that way, but, in the 3D warehouse, you are not going to find many that follows that rule! They all use an electron thin wall, and don't even know about front/back faces! Let alone paper thin glass (no thickness)!! That's why I try to get some 3ds files, then use AccuTrans3D to convert it to KMZ so that I can load it in SKP.
However, you're obj importer is by far the best of all! Thank you, and it's free!
Your renderer looks fantastic too. Great job, and thanks for taking the time to answer my post.
-
i cannot get it into sketchup.
OS: Win 7
SU: 8what should i do. (be detailed please)
-
Put the .rb file into your ../Plugins folder and restart Sketchup.
Use Menu > File > OBJexporter
Otherwise please be more specific with your problem's description... -
TIG, I have another one for you. I created a simple Cornell box with a sphere in the middle. Sketchup OBj exporter rendered perfectly, yours seems to have not soften it! See screen shot...
-
I have another one for you...
http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/details?mid=7d08b8065f038651a84f612e66a67b9a&prevstart=0
This guy did this by the book. It renders fine when exported using SKP obj exporter, but not when using yours!
-
Are you using the latest version of my exporter [v1.5] ?
This was updated to correct some smooth-normal issues, and it seems to work on exports tested by others.
Please download it from the first post and retry your sphere/box...
[It is also very similar to my Octane exporter which renders smoothed faces as expected too]When re-importing it into a SKP you need to use this http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=318928#p318928 new tool - my old OBJimporter is now surpassed [and it never imported 'smoothness' anyway]...
-
Here's a quick test.
The SKP has two spheres one smoothed [dotted edges] and the other faceted.
It is exported as an OBJ and then used in a quick Octane render, which shows the smoothed sphere as a rounded pearl and the faceted one exactly as they are the SKP ?
Are you sure you have the latest version of OBJexporter ?
-
I also tested the 'Mullaghmore' house.
The roof carpentry [first scene] exported to OBJ fine and here's a render in Octane
compared to the original it seems perfect ?
When I exported the whole house and its site [house] to OBJ it took a while and it then loaded into Octane but after all of the materials loaded it crashed it [it does have 90 textures and then other materials, although the OBJ itself is relatively modest]. When I re-imported it into a SKP after some considerable wait I got it to import. Clearly all smoothing was lost [currently all OBJ importers to SKP ignore smoothed normals]. I could have then quickly re-smoothed and got back to something like the original. There was considerable redundancy with interior structure, furniture etc that's 'on' in the exported scene but never visible in a 'site' view - luckily the SKP is very well layered, so switching those unneeded things' layers 'off' let it be exported quickly to OBJ and then it rendered nicely in Octane too... The 'tiling' is a function of the original texture mapping rather than the export or render - just compare it with the original SKP view
I'm not getting any real issues here - only that I can't expect a renderer to cope with a zillion unneeded hidden things in the model line floor joists and WCs as it needs to calculate all of them unnecessarily... -
Thanks TIG, but I do have the latest. I think I found the problem. It is that in some instances, your exporter export some faces as back face, that is, in the obj file, f 1/1/1 2/2/2 3/3/3 is f 3/3/3 2/2/2 1/1/1. Here is how I found out. Check this model...
http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/details?mid=92970bdb82c1dcaa4aa799012ff337af&prevstart=0
You see the first brown door on the right? Erase everything except that door, then remove the frame and the back door (it's a bifold). Now you are left only with the 3d rect (6 faces, not paper thin). Now, the last two line foe example, is the front...
f 21/21/21 22/22/22 23/23/23
f 22/22/22 21/21/21 24/24/24and it is reverse. a ray bouncing of the normal goes inward, not outward. Now, it I modify it like this...
f 23/23/23 22/22/22 21/21/21
f 24/24/24 21/21/21 22/22/22it now renders fine and the face if oriented properly.
Most render such as yours may not be affected by this, but mine is! The fact remain that the face is not oriented properly.
Or is it just me that's going nuts?
Advertisement