End of Sketchup development?
-
people around here have come to very similar conclusions based on, well, nothing really..
without citing a clear and credible/reliable source on your info, it comes across as nothing more than hearsay..
i'm not saying it isn't true.. but your post does nothing to really prove that.
-
I don't want to prove anything. I want to know if it's true. And as I mention I heard someone saying that...it is hearsay!
-
I think Google enjoys the increased use of sketchup since it took over and as such I doubt they will stop development on it completely. People tend to lose interest in products that are perceived as absolete because of their stagnation even if it's still a good product.
My conclusion would be that in the worst case, devolopment will become slower and much less innovative but would continue none the less. -
If true, you should immediately start a campaign to get SU open-sourced so it doesn't become "abandon ware."
-
I tend to agree with Marian...
I do believe we'll see a SU v8 and most likely also a ver. 9, but no-one knows what will happen after that... I don't even believe people at Google knows...I'm sure they've made a long term business strategy, but it will rate high class confidential...
If, however, they would have made plans to abandon SU, I'm quite certain that they wouldn't even bother to make the SU Basecamp...It's all pure speculation and malicious tongues (perhaps initiated by competitors or people who think bad about SU)...
I'd imagine that if Google decided to abandon further development of SU, they could decide to make it open source and I'm sure that would mean "new life"...
-
You're absolutely right Marian. SketchUp won't be dropped by Google, but I can imagine that they have other interests then the users that are working with it for years....At the moment I'm working with a SU-setup that is completely based on the plug-ins I use. Without them, SU can't do the job for me anymore....And these are quit fundamental plug-ins, needed for decent architectural design.
That's why I was concerned about the "hearsay"....I have the feeling that I'm using a product that won't evolve to the one I want to work with. This is hard for me te say because I'm working with it since version 2!
-
I think most of us sketchuppers rely heavily on plugins to get decent results easier and faster and most of us have that same feeling as you, I know I have.
These plugins also make Google's job a lot easier, all they have to do is to improve the base app, make it more stable, more flexible, more efficient and up to date without contending with the development of each specialised tool like most professional modelling software.
Because of this I doubt that the budget for SU is very big or will ever be very big compared with the serious competitors.
While this strategy is not as satisfying as we would want, I think you have nothing to fear, Su was initially developed for architecture and SU still relies on that for the GE models and that means it is the most likely direction for its near future developement if any. -
I always thought that the main idea behind Sketchup, was to keep it simple, so everyone could use it with little knowledge of 3D software. I think that basic Sketchup fits that concept. We have seen further development with the addition of Presentation to Sketchup Pro and might continue in that direction.
Look what happened to Microsoft Vista. Most people thought it was over-developed and did not buy the software. Microsoft saw the light and produced Windows 7 sofware.
Reducing the size of the Sketchup development team would be a sign; that there were no plans to continue developing Sketchup Pro. Has there been a reduction of team size?
-
As long as we are speculating, prior to the release of v7, based on Google's stated positions on SU (not a product that will compete with professional CAD applications), I too believed that SU's development was stagnant. Then with the release of v7, for the first time (to my knowledge) Google actually stated that SU would contain additional features in the future. They also took a step towards distinguishing SU Pro as a professional tool by removing Dxf2Su from v8 free, and making it an exclusive part of v8 Pro. Beware of what we ask for, there may be unanticipated complications that come with an improved version of SU.
-
well, of course, no-one can say anything for sure (there is always some secret around further development) but based on the SU version that program manager John Bacus's profile is showing, I would tend to suspect that development has not stopped - at least yet.
Now it is of course a different matter where, which direction this development is going but I doubt they would have started a relatively new tool (for the Pro users); LayOut, if they intended to abandon development completely.If SU itself is not developed with newer and newer tools but the concentrate on improving the core engine and making it possible for plugin developers to use newer and more effective methods - i.e. if SU is going to the direction that it is becoming a better and improved platformfor third party developers, I am already pleased. After all, we get all tools we need from these developers.
-
I'm far less worried about Google stopping development than I am about Fredo6 or TIG getting bored and moving on to something else. I would be happy to see Google strictly consult with the developers on this forum and give Sketchup the tools they need to keep creating better plugins. I love SU just how it is, built by users, for users. The best case scenario would be a future of open source development.
-
+1 for SU as a platform. Give us access to the inner gears of SU so we can mould SU to what we want it to be.
-
@thomthom said:
+1 for SU as a platform. Give us access to the inner gears of SU so we can mould SU to what we want it to be.
I'm wondering what would this mean in terms of copyright infringement. I mean if skp. went open source would this mean the shadow bug could be fixed without legal recrimination? Would proprietary skp patents be forgotten (isn't pushpull patented?)
-
Dale, i think thom is talking about a more powerful api rather than open sourcing SU, although that would be rather cool
With regards to the legal stuff you mention, carmacks reverse (aka the shadow bug fix) is still patented, so even if SU was open sourced youd have to break the law (or find an alternative fix.) Not sure what would happen with respect to patents, it'd probably depend on what license the source code was released under.
-
Ah, thanks for the clarification Remus.
-
I´m looking foward to blender bmesh integration that will be implemented in the next version, with blender 2.5 enhanced UI customization, I don´t think is necessary sketchup to go open source.
http://bmeshblender.wordpress.com/ -
i'm not quite following what you're saying there jaceguay.
what's bmesh have to do with sketchup? (or, what's bmesh in the first place?)
-
@unknownuser said:
the day that Google becomes insolvent.
I'm sure that's just around the corner. . . .probably keepin' em up at night.
-
Among other things is the ability to make faces with more than 4 vertices (NGONS), like we have in sketchup. It could make the 3d modeling workflow a little more like sketchup for architectural models.
-
how often i find myself wishing that sketchup was like blender! Not the program itself, but the open source, enthusiastic and fast paced development community. Even if bmesh fails to fulfill my architectural modeling needs, sketchup and blender would still compliment one another nicely as sibling projects don't you think!? each filling their own niche.
Advertisement