Subdivide and Smooth Feature Requests

gaganraj

a tool to toggle between subdivied/unsubdivided?

remus

Just to register my votes for stuff thats already been mentioned:

Subdivide selected (in the more automated way you described)
More options for subdivision type (doo-sabin being the main one that springs to mind.)
Being able to flip between subdivide/unsubdivide without undo.

A few new ones:

a crease tool that you can drag, the current method is too slow in my opinion, its almost always easier to use crease selection from the menu.
Some sculpting tools would be sweet. id guess this is easier said than done, though.

gaganraj

how about a way to easily select loops, and perhaps slicing them?

fbartels

Hi Dale,

It would be really helpful to be able to select multiple proxy shapes and set SDS working on them automatically in sequence. Running SDS on a complex shape at levels 3 or 4 can take quite a while and you can't use SU while that's happening, but if you are doing multiple proxies you need to hang around and wait for each one to finish before starting on the next. Ideally, I'd like to be able to select X number of proxies and leave the computer chugging away at them.

Thanks for the current SDS and versions to come.

Fred

remus

being ale to crease edge with varying degrees of 'crease' would be cool. i.e. being able to make the crease softer or harder.

princedragoncok

How about a smoove tool which works always perpendicular to the surface/face you are working on. ex. A sphere to which the smoove tool can be applied to from any direction.

Whaat

@remus said:

Being able to flip between subdivide/unsubdivide without undo.

This seems to be a common request. Users seem to be not using proxy subdivision modelling in favour of applying SDS and then hitting the 'undo' button to get back to unsubdivided. This leads me to believe that there are some workflow issues with proxy modelling. Can someone tell me what are the reasons that users do not like to use the low-poly proxy modelling workflow?

Another question I have is this:
Does anyone ever use the 'copy materials' option? It is slow and does not properly interpolate the UV coordinates. I had in mind to fix the UV issue but my preference would be to remove the feature entirely. It will always be slow and I wonder if there is any significant benefit to it. Fixing the UV issue will take a lot of time and I would rather devote time to other features. Any thoughts?

l.frisken

if it automatically applied smoothing when it finished then I reckon more people would use the apply materials option

ely862me

i don t know if u can make a chamfer tool..this will be great and save a lot of work(at last for me)
the only bad thing and decisive is that SU works with triangulation ,and because of this is almost impossible to create chamfer

baz

@ely862me said:

i don t know if u can make a chamfer tool..this will be great and save a lot of work(at last for me)
the only bad thing and decisive is that SU works with triangulation ,and because of this is almost impossible to create chamfer

perhaps 'sketchy bevel' by chris philips would do this for you? It draws chamfers.

baz

ely862me

that is good for flat areas ,,on the triangulated areas it s a mess
this is what i m talking about .. this is a normal mesh this is what i want for chamfer to do :adding one or more lines to the selected lines sds result after chamfer sds result without chamfer

xrok1

@unknownuser said:

Another question I have is this:
Does anyone ever use the 'copy materials' option? It is slow and does not properly interpolate the UV coordinates. I had in mind to fix the UV issue but my preference would be to remove the feature entirely. It will always be slow and I wonder if there is any significant benefit to it. Fixing the UV issue will take a lot of time and I would rather devote time to other features. Any thoughts?

it would be great if it worked, i think everyone would use it. if for nothing else than selection sets by material.

utiler

@unknownuser said:

Free or nominal Upgrade to those who bought?

Has this been answered yet......?

remus

Whats so bad about the current SDS that you need a free upgrade to win you over?

utiler

@remus said:

Whats so bad about the current SDS that you need a free upgrade to win you over?

Nothing Remus, just wanting to keep up with the latest release....

Whaat

@utiler said:

@unknownuser said:

Free or nominal Upgrade to those who bought?

Has this been answered yet......?
I really don't know the answer to this. It is too early to say. I really hope we can set up a system on Smustard to provide a nominal upgrade price for those who bought. As far as I know, Smustard is still not set up to do this. I know RickW was looking into this and I intend to ask him what the status is.

utiler

Thanks for the update Dale.....

remus

Sorry for being a bit snappy there andrew, i thought you meant it in 'SDS wasnt worth the cash the first time so we should get a free upgrade' sort of way Thats obviously not the case.

utiler

Certainly not mate..... I wouldn't have spent hours creating an Australian Steel profiles library to upload if it wasn't worth it!!!!!

Bobby Cheung

Hi, i was wondering how can i add a thickness to a curved object'surface? eg like offsetting it. The reason of asking is let say if i have to creat a mould for a product, and i need to give a thickness to the rapid prototyping machine.