sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    Oops, your profile's looking a bit empty! To help us tailor your experience, please fill in key details like your SketchUp version, skill level, operating system, and more. Update and save your info on your profile page today!
    πŸ«› Lightbeans Update | Metallic and Roughness auto-applied in SketchUp 2025+ Download

    Retrievin object's absolute height ??

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Developers' Forum
    18 Posts 5 Posters 898 Views 5 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • artmusicstudioA Offline
      artmusicstudio
      last edited by

      hi tig,
      i understood and made some tests.
      but if i have a group named

      @main_element (i persume it has a transformation, even it is not moved or anything else)
      and say

      tra = @main_element.transformation

      i get errors , since my syntax is wrong.

      could you give me the syntax for retrieving the transformation from a group?

      i tried a lot of ways, but always get errors.

      thank you!
      stan

      edit:
      when i define tra as

      tra = @main_element.transformation.to_a
      

      i get

      tra [1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0]

      how can i interpret the numbers?

      edit 2:
      when i move a group in Z+, tra becomes

      tra [1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1968.503937007874, 1.0]

      so 14th position seems to give the height.

      the problem is, that if i create a plane in a certain height (Z+), the transformation counts this as 0,0,0 .
      pos. 14 changes first, when i move the group from its origin place, where it was created.......this transformation is not related to absolute zero.... 😞

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jolranJ Offline
        jolran
        last edited by

        Does this work ?

        If I resue my code with TIG's recommendations..

        gpz = group.transformation.origin.z
        zmax = pts.map{|p| p.z + gpz }.max

        You could also have a look at Bounds.corner.points and get the highest Z value from those,
        unless you are interested in a particular vertice or so..

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • artmusicstudioA Offline
          artmusicstudio
          last edited by

          hi jolran,

          1. i'll test your new idea later tonight, but i had the formula with origin
          tra = @main_element.transformation.origin
          

          already and it gave me the origin of the group at the point, where it was made, not to absolute [0,0,0]. but we shall see !!

          1. bounding box : i tried this, but i don't need the lowest point of a group, but one special corner within it, so lowest z of the bbox does not help here.
            and when i retrieve the bbox of the nested element, itz again is relative, not absolute.

          seems to be tricky somehow....

          thanx
          stan

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • sdmitchS Offline
            sdmitch
            last edited by

            @artmusicstudio said:

            hi tig,
            i understood and made some tests.
            but if i have a group named

            @main_element (i persume it has a transformation, even it is not moved or anything else)
            and say

            Yes at the moment the group is created it is given an Identity Transformation.

            tra = @main_element.transformation
            i get errors , since my syntax is wrong.

            The only reason this would give you syntax errors is if the variable @main_element has not been physically associated with the group.

            could you give me the syntax for retrieving the transformation from a group?
            i tried a lot of ways, but always get errors.

            mod = Sketchup.active_model # Open model
            > ent = mod.entities # All entities in model
            > sel = mod.selection # Current selection
            > @main_element = ent.grep(Sketchup;;Group).select{|g| g.name=="@main_element"}[0]
            > tra = @main_element.transformation; #save the current transformation
            > @main_element.transform! tra.inverse; # return the group to its created position
            > zmax = @main_element.bounds.max.z; puts zmax; # get the max z
            > @main_element.transform! tra; # return the group to its current position
            

            thank you!
            stan

            edit:
            when i define tra as

            tra = @main_element.transformation.to_a
            

            i get

            tra [1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0]

            how can i interpret the numbers?

            edit 2:
            when i move a group in Z+, tra becomes

            tra [1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1968.503937007874, 1.0]

            so 14th position seems to give the height.

            the problem is, that if i create a plane in a certain height (Z+), the transformation counts this as 0,0,0 .
            pos. 14 changes first, when i move the group from its origin place, where it was created.......this transformation is not related to absolute zero.... 😞

            Nothing is worthless, it can always be used as a bad example.

            http://sdmitch.blogspot.com/

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S Offline
              slbaumgartner
              last edited by

              @sdmitch said:

              @artmusicstudio said:

              hi tig,
              i understood and made some tests.
              but if i have a group named

              mod = Sketchup.active_model # Open model
              > > ent = mod.entities # All entities in model
              > > sel = mod.selection # Current selection
              > > @main_element = ent.grep(Sketchup;;Group).select{|g| g.name=="@main_element"}[0]
              > > tra = @main_element.transformation; #save the current transformation
              > > @main_element.transform! tra.inverse; # return the group to its created position
              > > zmax = @main_element.bounds.max.z; puts zmax; # get the max z
              > > @main_element.transform! tra; # return the group to its current position
              

              thank you!
              stan

              The code block above seems to have been edited out of your earlier post, but sdmitch grabbed it first. It seems to reveal confusion between the name attribute of a group and the symbolic name of a variable that refers to that group. These are separate, unrelated concepts. That is, if you write

              @foo = ents.add_group #@foo is a variable that refers to a group with no name attribute
              @foo.name = "@main_element" #@foo now refers to a group with name attribute "@main_element"

              Following this code, there is no such variable as @main_element. Conversely, there is no group whose name attribute is @foo.

              Your search above looks for a group whose name attribute is "@main_element". Did you assign that previously using Group#name=, or are you assuming that because you earlier created a group referenced by a variable named @main_element that the group has that as its name attribute (wrong). In any case, you need to test what value was assigned to @main_element by your search. I bet it is nil (because the search found nothing), and that is the cause of your syntax error.

              Steve

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jolranJ Offline
                jolran
                last edited by

                I haven't follow along the other discussion so pardon me if butting in..

                But If your only concern is the get the heighest elements point(?) won't this code work regardless of any transformation made ?

                %(#FF0000)[bb = group.bounds # could be any element responding to Bounds.
                cornersZmax = (0..7).collect{|i| bb.corner(i).z }.max]

                I tested and it seams to be working. ?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • TIGT Offline
                  TIG Moderator
                  last edited by

                  Since I haven't seen your code...
                  Here's a guess...

                  If your 'reference' is to a 'group' OR a 'component-instance', then it WILL have a 'transformation'.
                  BUT if that 'reference' is to a 'definition' it will NOT ! πŸ˜’

                  puts @main_element.class in your code will tell you what the reference is...

                  TIG

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • sdmitchS Offline
                    sdmitch
                    last edited by

                    What are we trying to determine? If it is the highest point regardless of location and/or orientation or the true height of the group?

                    Nothing is worthless, it can always be used as a bad example.

                    http://sdmitch.blogspot.com/

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • jolranJ Offline
                      jolran
                      last edited by

                      πŸ˜„

                      I interpreted this as highest point.

                      @unknownuser said:

                      i would like to calculate the height of a defined point (say toppoint of a bbox)
                      above absolute sketchup 0,0,0.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • sdmitchS Offline
                        sdmitch
                        last edited by

                        In that case, ?group?.bounds.max.z should give you that in SU8.

                        Nothing is worthless, it can always be used as a bad example.

                        http://sdmitch.blogspot.com/

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • TIGT Offline
                          TIG Moderator
                          last edited by

                          It's possible to devise a group with a transformation where the group.bound.max.z will NOT be a vertex.
                          If the proposition is to find the highest vertex in a group that is not the same thing ?
                          However, if you are simply trying to find the max.z it will do...
                          See this simple illustration...


                          Capture.PNG

                          TIG

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • jolranJ Offline
                            jolran
                            last edited by

                            @unknownuser said:

                            element.bounds.max.z

                            Yeah, that's way simpler...
                            But as TIG pointed out bbox cp is not always safest way to find highest vertex, so normally one end up traversing the collection anyway.

                            I'm starting to wonder if TO wants to measure the face height..

                            to reuse the transformation origin maybe try this.. I guess theres more than 1 way to do this.

                            targetZ = 0
                            org = group.transformation.origin
                            
                            group.entities.to_a.grep(Sketchup;;Edge).each{|edg|
                                sz = edg.start.position.z
                                ez = edg.end.position.z
                                tmax = (sz > ez ? sz ; ez) + org.z
                                next unless tmax > targetZ 
                                 targetZ = tmax
                            }
                            puts targetZ.to_l
                            
                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • sdmitchS Offline
                              sdmitch
                              last edited by

                              @jolran said:

                              @unknownuser said:

                              element.bounds.max.z

                              Yeah, that's way simpler...
                              But as TIG pointed out bbox cp is not always safest way to find highest vertex, so normally one end up traversing the collection anyway.

                              I'm starting to wonder if TO wants to measure the face height..

                              to reuse the transformation origin maybe try this.. I guess theres more than 1 way to do this.

                              targetZ = 0
                              > org = group.transformation.origin
                              > 
                              > group.entities.to_a.grep(Sketchup;;Edge).each{|edg|
                              >     sz = edg.start.position.z
                              >     ez = edg.end.position.z
                              >     tmax = (sz > ez ? sz ; ez) + org.z
                              >     next unless tmax > targetZ 
                              >      targetZ = tmax
                              > }
                              > puts targetZ.to_l
                              

                              Sorry but that only works if there is no rotation. Here is another way

                              targetZ = 0
                              tra = group.transformation
                              group.entities.to_a.grep(Sketchup;;Edge).each{|edg|
                                  sz = edg.start.position.transform(tra).z
                                  ez = edg.end.position.transform(tra).z
                              	targetZ = [targetZ,sz,ez].max
                              }
                              puts targetZ.to_l
                              

                              Nothing is worthless, it can always be used as a bad example.

                              http://sdmitch.blogspot.com/

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • jolranJ Offline
                                jolran
                                last edited by

                                Dats true. But I don't understand why you opt to create a new Array for each edge instead of a ternary πŸ˜•

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • 1 / 1
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Buy SketchPlus
                                Buy SUbD
                                Buy WrapR
                                Buy eBook
                                Buy Modelur
                                Buy Vertex Tools
                                Buy SketchCuisine
                                Buy FormFonts

                                Advertisement