Face.classify_point - compare results?
-
Out of interest I wrote this snippet
Sketchup.constants.sort.each{|e|puts e;eval("Sketchup::"+e+".constants").each{|c|puts "\t"+c};puts}
which prints out all Sketchup 'constants' - as this on my system at least [e.g. I expect Geodesic is an extra type added by a script...] There aren't that many 'constants' found this way...AppObserver ArcCurve AttributeDictionaries AttributeDictionary Behavior Camera Color ComponentDefinition ComponentInstance Console ConstructionLine ConstructionPoint Curve DefinitionList DefinitionObserver DefinitionsObserver Drawingelement Edge EdgeUse Entities EntitiesObserver Entity EntityObserver Face PointOutside PointInside PointOnFace PointUnknown PointOnEdge PointNotOnPlane PointOnVertex Geodesic TETRA_S SQRT2 PRIMITIVES TETRA_R GOLDEN_MEAN TETRA_Q TETRA_T SQRT3 Group HLR Image Importer ImportFail ImportFileNotFound ImportSuccess ImporterNotFound ImportCanceled InputPoint InstanceObserver Layer Layers LayersObserver Loop Material Materials MaterialsObserver Menu Model ModelObserver OptionsManager OptionsProvider OptionsProviderObserver Page Pages UnitsPixels ImageLinked UnitsNormalizedY ImageEmbeddedAndLinked UnitsNormalizedX ImageEmbedded PagesObserver PickHelper RenderingOptions ROPAssign ROPSetDisplayInstanceAxes ROPSetFogHint ROPSetDisplaySketchAxes ROPSetGroundColor ROPSetExtendEdges ROPSetLineExtension ROPSetDepthQueWidth ROPSetSectionDefaultCutColor ROPSetFogUseBkColor ROPSetTexture ROPSetHighlightColor ROPEditComponent ROPSetModelTransparency ROPSetDrawUnderground ROPSetFaceColorMode ROPSetFogDist ROPSetLockedColor ROPSetSkyColor ROPSetJitterEdges ROPSetExtendLines ROPSetLineEndEdges ROPSetSectionInactiveColor ROPSetDisplayDims ROPSetTransparencyObsolete ROPSetForegroundColor ROPDrawHidden ROPSetEdgeType ROPSetDrawGround ROPSetProfileWidth ROPSetFogColor ROPSetProfilesOnlyEdges ROPSetHideConstructionGeometry ROPSetEdgeColorMode ROPSetDisplayColorByLayer ROPSetDepthQueEdges ROPSetSectionActiveColor ROPSetDisplayText ROPSetRenderMode ROPSetBackgroundColor ROPSetSectionDisplayMode ROPSetFaceColor ROPSetDrawHorizon ROPSetProfileEdges ROPSetDisplayFog ROPSetLineEndWidth ROPSetSectionCutWidth ROPSetEdgeDisplayMode ROPSetConstructionColor ROPTransparencySortMethod ROPSetMaterialTransparency ROPSetGroundTransparency RenderingOptionsObserver SectionPlane Selection SelectionObserver ShadowInfo ShadowInfoObserver Style Styles Text Texture TextureWriter Tools ToolsObserver UVHelper Vertex View ViewObserver ["AppObserver", "ArcCurve", "AttributeDictionaries", "AttributeDictionary", "Behavior", "Camera", "Color", "ComponentDefinition", "ComponentInstance", "Console", "ConstructionLine", "ConstructionPoint", "Curve", "DefinitionList", "DefinitionObserver", "DefinitionsObserver", "Drawingelement", "Edge", "EdgeUse", "Entities", "EntitiesObserver", "Entity", "EntityObserver", "Face", "Geodesic", "Group", "HLR", "Image", "Importer", "InputPoint", "InstanceObserver", "Layer", "Layers", "LayersObserver", "Loop", "Material", "Materials", "MaterialsObserver", "Menu", "Model", "ModelObserver", "OptionsManager", "OptionsProvider", "OptionsProviderObserver", "Page", "Pages", "PagesObserver", "PickHelper", "RenderingOptions", "RenderingOptionsObserver", "SectionPlane", "Selection", "SelectionObserver", "ShadowInfo", "ShadowInfoObserver", "Style", "Styles", "Text", "Texture", "TextureWriter", "Tools", "ToolsObserver", "UVHelper", "Vertex", "View", "ViewObserver"] -
RenderingOptionsgot contants!!
One can actually use constants - that refer to integers (I assume indexes) to refer to options. That should be more efficient than strings.
-
@thomthom said:
RenderingOptionsgot contants!!
One can actually use constants - that refer to integers (I assume indexes) to refer to options. That should be more efficient than strings.Yes it's weird ?
I can't really see what half of these do... -
hm... yea - the names are odd. Might just be internal constants. Which would explain why they are not documented.
-
Alright so I posted my results on the api but is it possible to edit it in case there is a mistake?(not that I've found one) Oh and it's posted as anonymous.... whatever.
Advertisement