Can you see it?
-
One word of caution, don t expect your brain to work in reconstructing the 3d if you are ebriated.The brain part structure responsible for this reconstruction is sleeping.Try again the evening after.
-
@koipetta said:
yes,exactly.For instance, if you are myopic you will see it caving in ...
Oh. Well, I see some of it caving in and some of it popping out. In the last picture, the brown spots appear to pop outward for me. Love 'em.
-
@unknownuser said:
@koipetta said:
yes,exactly.For instance, if you are myopic you will see it caving in ...
Oh. Well, I see some of it caving in and some of it popping out. In the last picture, the brown spots appear to pop outward for me. Love 'em.
yeah, 1/2 the picture pops out and 1/2 caves..
regardless, i'm seeing the last one opposite of sunoobie.. the brown caves in and the red pops.. -
This is a bit harder for me to see but when you see it, it's one of the nicest. I think the black and white are harder because this one and the other B&W are the hardest for me to see. I can see the other ones almost instantly. Perhaps as a test, you could post the same design both in color and in B&W so we can compare them. Keep up the awesome work.
P.S. I'm still waiting for a tutorial.
-
Yes,good idea,Sketchupnoobie, i will put it righ away!
-
I got it. It is definitely harder though and it took me a while. I think colors really make it easier. I'm not sure why. Maybe because the shades and shadows are easier to recognize in color. It's a shame though, because the white and black ones are really nice.
-
Cool. Apart from the darker spot in the top right, it's pretty easy to see. You got a B&W one of this?
-
@unknownuser said:
Cool. Apart from the darker spot in the top right, it's pretty easy to see. You got a B&W one of this?
it is up there,the artistic one but no processing!
-
Oh I see it. Ya, I think the colored one is easier to see and stay focused on.
So . . . any ideas on how to make these yet?
-
Ah, O.K. Gotcha'. So this isn't raw SketchUp output?
-
Yep, the last jpeg was 1.5 millions+ polys.SU would have drop dead a longway before any output!
-
@koipetta said:
One word of caution, don t expect your brain to work in reconstructing the 3d if you are ebriated.The brain part structure responsible for this reconstruction is sleeping.Try again the evening after.
No wonder my sight went almost completely nuts a few years back when I got into these stereogram thingies
Used to mess around with this Katsura software a few years back (Mac OSX only, but there is bound to be loads more out there for Windows too!)
-
But i assure you, this is not stereograms only geometry with eye-brain reconstructing scheme giving back the 3D.A mondial first,first time 2D works is expressing 3D in a credible fashion.
-
Fresh bake...5 millions polys,16 min. (1920X1080)
This one might tax your 3D vision! -
@koipetta said:
Not much talk from you guys,those render you speechless?
more like..
you've seen one, you've seen them all.maybe try applying the technique to something more useful than 'wow, that's neat' ?
-
Yes. I would like something like this applied to something else. Any ideas? By the way, the last one is nice.
-
@unknownuser said:
more like..
you've seen one, you've seen them all.maybe try applying the technique to something more useful than 'wow, that's neat' ?
Usefull like a house,a bycicle,a boat or a cellular phone?Thousand of you are at it daily and i agree with you,more the same!But...i can see the difference between all of these essays,subtility,innovation,beautifull technique and know how and daily,i`m learning a lot.Jeff,what did you do lately that was so usefull?This question about the usefullness implies that the subject should not be on this forum?
-
@koipetta said:
Usefull like a house,a bycicle,a boat or a cellular phone?Thousand of you are at it daily and i agree with you,more the same!But...i can see the difference between all of these essays,subtility,innovation,beautifull technique and know how and daily,i`m learning a lot.Jeff,what did you do lately that was so usefull?This question about the usefullness implies that the subject should not be on this forum?
hmm.
didn't mean to ruffle your feathers.. i was just answering your query as to why no one was responding to your latest uploads.regarding usefulness on this forum.. i don't think there's any problem that you're posting here. but think about it a bit -- this is a sketchup forum and you're posting non SU stuff.. people have asked multiple times how it's done etc to which you've basically replied "sorry, it's too mathematically complex for you to understand"
and left it at that.. that's pretty much shut down any further dialog in the thread dontcha think? unless you're simply seeking praise in which case, i'm pretty sure most people have been rendered speechless. -
@unknownuser said:
this is a sketchup forum and you're posting non SU stuff
I think he used SU for at least part of his process. Right?
-
The feathers are fine ,thank you. Point taken!But the purpose of this was to ascertain if any other person was seeing this 3D effect.This was rule as a certainty but with difference depending of the observer.No easy explanation could be given as to how i am doing it.It revolves around meshing,meshing and meshing.Operations that can be very frustating since some of them are not compatible and you end up having a lot of crash or loop.It take o lot of patience and time to get it right.Since it requires others softwares than SU,i was reluctant to get there because i felt it was inappropriate.About understanding,complexity and mathematic,i beleived most of the SU users could do it easy.It is me who is trying to ride that horse a wee bit longer.Now in a few days, i will post edit and remove the jpegs.No praise needed!
Yes, Su is at the basis of all this!
Advertisement