sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    Revit to SketchUp [Rant]

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Extensions & Applications Discussions
    extensions
    22 Posts 8 Posters 5.6k Views 8 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • thomthomT Offline
      thomthom
      last edited by

      I have tried with .FBX - and then used Autodesk's FBX converter to convert to .3ds.

      Thomas Thomassen — SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
      List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • boofredlayB Offline
        boofredlay
        last edited by

        Does it work any better?

        http://www.coroflot.com/boofredlay

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • thomthomT Offline
          thomthom
          last edited by

          FBX will preserve materials - while DWG will have none. But DWG preserve components better.
          I made a crude script that iterated the model and applied some basic materials to DWG imports from revit - does most of the work.

          Thomas Thomassen — SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
          List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • honoluludesktopH Offline
            honoluludesktop
            last edited by

            Hmmm........ So the problem is apparent in revit. Sort of like SU's default number of edges in a circle. At least SU provides the user the option to change the number of edges. Well hope you fellows can find a acceptable solution.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • AdamBA Offline
              AdamB
              last edited by

              It would be trivial to write a Ruby that welded coplanar triangles back into polygons.

              Or is this something different?

              Adam

              Developer of LightUp Click for website

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • boofredlayB Offline
                boofredlay
                last edited by

                That is the problem Adam, they are not coplanar. See image.
                I have also attached the main curved part of the counter for review. The geometry is simply a mess.


                Retail Counter Part.skp


                Counters6.jpg

                http://www.coroflot.com/boofredlay

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • AdamBA Offline
                  AdamB
                  last edited by

                  I think I can see what is happening. Revit is trying to coalesce triangles. You can see this from your pic.
                  I think what is happening is the tolerances for flatness are being confused the scale of the curvature. Imagine a single triangle. Is has 3 edge neighbours which are potential candidate for merging. If the curve is sufficiently small scale then Revit could mistaken choose a neighbour on the curve rather than the triangle that completes a Quad ..again and again.

                  So see if there is a tolerance for flatness/planarity that can be tweaked. You could also try doing a scale up of your model in Revit before export to workaround any hardwired tolerances in the exporter.

                  Adam

                  Developer of LightUp Click for website

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • boofredlayB Offline
                    boofredlay
                    last edited by

                    Ah, I see where you are coming from now. I will try to remember to have a look this week for a tolerance.

                    http://www.coroflot.com/boofredlay

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • AnssiA Offline
                      Anssi
                      last edited by

                      Is there a difference between exporting the model from Revit as a polymesh or ACIS solids? I must try myself, but I am just trying to learn Revit and haven't made anything spectacular to play with yet.

                      Anssi

                      securi adversus homines, securi adversus deos rem difficillimam adsecuti sunt, ut illis ne voto quidem opus esset

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P Offline
                        putnik
                        last edited by

                        Anssi, exporting as polymesh gives you one exploded mesh, no groups, no components. With ACIS solids export, everything is nicely grouped.

                        I find Fletch's Revit to SkethcUp via DWG workflow to be the best from what I've tried so far (thank you Fletch!). What I'm struggling to overcome is that all Revit walls import into SU as one of two layers, Walls Interior or Walls Exterior. We have different types of wall cladding used in a fairly intricate pattern, brickwork, diff. types of metal cladding, exotec etc. It is a big project and the idea of reapplying all the wall materials inside SketchUp is very painful (other building elements export fine and are managable).

                        Anybody have any thoughts?

                        http://keshas.info

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • AnssiA Offline
                          Anssi
                          last edited by

                          @putnik said:

                          Anssi, exporting as polymesh gives you one exploded mesh, no groups, no components. With ACIS solids export, everything is nicely grouped.

                          I did my first 3D DWG export try yesterday and it was rather positive. Ok-had no fancy forms, but the minuscule rounded corners someone had put on his window profiles looked quite clean. I used the polymesh option and exported from a parallel projection view. Walls, slabs and roofs became simple surfaces, but family items (windows, doors, curtainwalls etc.) were neatly turned into components.

                          Anssi

                          securi adversus homines, securi adversus deos rem difficillimam adsecuti sunt, ut illis ne voto quidem opus esset

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1
                          • 2
                          • 2 / 2
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Buy SketchPlus
                          Buy SUbD
                          Buy WrapR
                          Buy eBook
                          Buy Modelur
                          Buy Vertex Tools
                          Buy SketchCuisine
                          Buy FormFonts

                          Advertisement