Hardware recommendations
-
Hi Ben,
In fact I am in the same fix as you. Company policy limits our choice to a particular make. The model range that I have to choose from does not even carry the CPU that you chose, so we are settling to a somewhat slower clockrate and a more expensive video card instead.
However, as I said in my previous post, your choice is about the fastest desktop computer that you can get, and choosing a different make will not help, as adding a second CPU does nothing for SU. The Lenovo workstation I tested was a bit noisy, though. The modern Xeon processors are based on the same technology as the i7 range, and the new features really seem to help single-threaded apps work faster than with the Core2Duo-range CPUs.
Anssi
-
One hardware addon I'm finding a joy to use with Sketchup is the Belkin N52te gamepad. it's basically a programmable keypad for the left hand. once setup it's lovely to use with SU
-
Hi guys
Thanks for the feedback
Our IT manager has changed his mind again and I am now getting the Lenovo W700 DS Work station Note Book. And its actually been ordered!!
Will let you know how it runs when it arrives next week.
Thanks for the help guys
Ben
-
Well, I finally join the hardware club now. Thinking about this desktop:
- Processor: INTEL Core2 Duo E8400 3.00GHz
- Memory: 4GbDDR3 1333Mhz
- Video card: nVidia 9600GT / HTD I / 1Gb
(plus all the rest but the above are the essential).
I'll be using it with a 32 bit Windows XP (for the time being) so no "need" for much more RAM ATM for instance.
-
Thats quite a nice little setup youve got there gai looks envious
-
Ah well, I really hope so. My laptop (I've been using for a year now but had got it from Mike so it's a rather old piece despite of its originally good specs) is really dying. It took about an hour and a half today to get it to start!
Also it keeps shutting down at the most unexpected moments (probably due to overheating) so forget about rendering for instance. I now put a big "family fan" against its back and also put it on "legs" so that the air stream can blow under its bottom... -
@jackson said:
Csaba, considering your laptop's current AND previous owners, could explain a lot!
Yes, indeed. I know I'll have to do the whole cleaning job, really. Once my new machine is up and running (hopefully some time early next week), I'll do it with the lappy. I just don't want to risk ending up with no computer at all as I have ongoing works (and of course, SCF ).
As for the reinstall; yeah, that will also happen. Although I think it was just about half a year or so when I last did it. However I'm afraid the lappy-lady is actually dying so I may even get it checked and if it's worth, maybe change a part or two.
-
Yikes! Silly question, but have you cleaned the inside of the laptop?
A quick guide for anyone who thinks they may need to do this:
-
Unplug the power cable and take out the battery.
-
Unscrew all the access panels on the underside, turn the laptop back right way up, open the screen/lid to 90ยฐ and stand it on its side. This is to create as many "holes" in the laptop chassis as possible so dust can be blown out effectively, even back out through the keyboard.
-
Using compressed air, blow a few extremely short bursts of air backwards through all the exhaust vents. This dislodges all the grunge which has accumulated on the leading edges of grilles, heatsinks and obstructions due to the constant one-directional air flow. Then do a couple of short bursts from the opposite direction (i.e. into the fan air intake) to ensure the dust you just blew backwards hasn't simply lodged somewhere else instead. Repeat this back-and-forth process a few times until you can't see any more dust coming out of either "end".
COMMON SENSE WARNING: Of course, if you're using an air compressor be very careful to limit the pressure and hold the nozzle back a few inches/cms from the actual vents as you can easily dislodge or damage components otherwise.
- If you can get access to the fan, CPU and GPU heatsinks, a large soft watercolour paint brush is great for getting in the nooks and crannies to get them shiny again (not unlike archeology!). A couple of gentle blasts of compressed air after brushing and they'll be like new.
I do this at least 3 or 4 times a year and (even though I only use it at home) a cloud of extremely fine dust is inevitably emitted from my laptop's innards every time.
A well-insulated CPU (i.e. covered in a nice fur coat of lovely fluffy dust) and blocked pipes will overheat in seconds and blowing more air through it (with an extra fan for example) could just cause more dust to accumulate, exacerbating the problem. All the more so in a smokey atmosphere which, Csaba, considering your laptop's current AND previous owners, could explain a lot!
Re: the incredibly slow start-up, it really sounds like you need to do a full OS resintall.
-
-
@gaieus said:
Yes, indeed. I know I'll have to do the whole cleaning job, really. Once my new machine is up and running (hopefully some time early next week), I'll do it with the lappy. I just don't want to risk ending up with no computer at all as I have ongoing works (and of course, SCF ).
I would have thought that a frequently critically overheating PC would be putting your work at a much greater risk than blowing some air through it now and again.
-
Without looking back over this thread, it seems to me that most people on here are talking about higher end, $1,500+ machines.
How does SU run on the very cheapest, GMA laptops available for around $300/400?
The PC I have right now is nearly three years old, bottom of the range eMachines desktop - Pentium 4 3.06Ghz, 384mb RAM, ati radeon xpress 200. For me, I really haven't had any problem with SU and the speed is perfectly acceptable for me.
How would this $378 Acer laptop from Wal Mart compare to my present one? http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=11068044 How would the 9 inch netbooks perform? http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=11319320
-
My old machine I started using SU on was one with a Pentium 2.7 GHz processor, 512 Mb memory and a 128 Mb Ati Radeon X550 card. SU ran smoothly on it and I built models with more than 1.2 million poly's and 300.000 faces on it (surely by using layers often hidden and all).
This one rocks though.
-
Sorry guys...I'm breaking into this discussion...but has anyone experienced the diffenrence with SU and a SSD??? Does a SSD boost the performance of SU?
Thank you!!!
-
@pep75 said:
Sorry guys...I'm breaking into this discussion...but has anyone experienced the diffenrence with SU and a SSD??? Does a SSD boost the performance of SU?
Thank you!!!
I don't remember where (probably here) I picked it up, but I seem to know that OpenGL (the thing that drives the SU display) does not support multiple graphics cards, so SSD benefits only DirectX, that is mainly used by games.
Anssi
-
I had an 6800GT and an 8800GT installed. worked fine.
-
@anssi said:
@pep75 said:
Sorry guys...I'm breaking into this discussion...but has anyone experienced the diffenrence with SU and a SSD??? Does a SSD boost the performance of SU?
Thank you!!!
I don't remember where (probably here) I picked it up, but I seem to know that OpenGL (the thing that drives the SU display) does not support multiple graphics cards, so SSD benefits only DirectX, that is mainly used by games.
Anssi
Hmmm... not exactly that - the guy is probably talking about hard drives and not display cards (solid state drives). Also, OpenGL can run too, over multiple cards - using a Fx3800 or better card. Application dependent, however.
-
Don't think it'd make any difference with SU whatsoever other than hard drive dependant tasks like opening files, autosaving, importing textures, etc. In terms of modelling and orbiting, hard drive speed is irrelevant AFAIK.
-
Hi Tommy great idea by the way, i've ben scanning through and had a look at the database as im looking to get a new computer at work as i'm cutrrently running sketchup on 2 computers here, one is on vista and the other is xp and both are becoming very sluggish. The reason is the models i'm creating are huge, ranging from 40 to 70 mb each once all the components are pieced together. The models are of new housing sites and the individual houses etc created on their own run perfectly, with only the odd glich when autosaving sometimes. As soon as i piece everything together onto a contoured layout it all slows up, causing problems.
Just wondered if there are any machines that stand out when using very large models as you can't tell on the database what sort of work people are using them for, and the machines im currently using work excellent with smaller models.
-
Have you updated to sketchup 7.1? if not its by far the easiest you could do to improve the performance with your models. (sorry that sounds so much like sales banter, but its true.)
-
I am currently running it on my other machine yes and i found it did improve it but again with the complete model its soo slow. The only way i get around it is by turning the majority of the layers off but obviously there are some points where i need to view the model with everything turned on
-
Hello, I'm new on sketchucation, and I 'd like to have some advice. I'm just done with architecture studies and owner of a new macbook pro unibody 15" 2.8Ghz - 4gb Ram - 512Mo dedicated. Sketchup pro 7 runs perfectly my diploma files (4mb, without any google warehouse components and shadows activated) with the better battery life configuration, so i don't have to switch. I haven't worked with sketchup for more than 20 minutes (just for a test) with this config. I was before running xp with nvidia 7600gt (256) and thas was terribly slow...
I have just noticed a problem with zooming in edges, that appeared with my old config, and appears with both graphic cards config on the macbook too.
The fact is that for other reasons, i asked apple a return, and i'm not sure i'll order the same config, because the 9400 integrated card seems to be enough to me. I'm planning using vectorworks(2D), cinema4D+V-ray, photoshop, and no games. The point is that if i choose the basic apple config, my processor will be only 2.53 and less disk space (250 to 500).
I'd like to hear what u think about that. Is there some mac users who can confirm or not what i'm saying. It's not really a money problem, but if i won't use this card, it's a bit stupid to buy it. Regards
PS : i d like to make some test with big scenes if u can send me some...
Advertisement