Impressive Sketchup House model needed
-
@toxicvoxel said:
There is some dispute over whether these words are those of John Ruskin but they sum up an age old truth that will remain long after this debate is gone:
@unknownuser said:
“There is hardly anything in the world that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and the people who consider price only are this man's lawful prey.”
.
Conversely... 'There is nothing in this world that someone cannot make better and cheaper...
We live in a consumer driven 'free market' society that is out of control. Jackson's post was well stated, however, Architects are not the only ones who suffer from this dilema. Anyone who provides a service or manufactures a product is prone to price cutting. Consider the small storekeeper who is driven out of business by Wallmart, or the manufacturer who cannot compete with foreign child labor and low costs. Who is to blame when people cannot make ends meet and are forced to buy cheap goods and who among us is not guilty. It is easy to blame someone like Kent, however, my question is, if he agreed to pay someone on this forum who has criticized him for the model, would that person then take the money and use it to purchase 'fair trade' or just go looking for a bargain?
-
@unknownuser said:
Conversely... 'There is nothing in this world that someone cannot make better and cheaper...
I do not believe that this statement holds true for the services provided by architects or any other design discipline for that matter.
-
I believe it should read "better OR cheaper"
-
Architecture is not immune from competitive pricing although in that field it is frowned upon and advertising of said prices is generally illegal in many states. If a client is seeking the services of either an architect or home designer and has limited funds (we are after all in a serious recession with some deflation) they will be drawn towards a fee that they can afford.
Higher pricing does not equate to higher quality in the service industry. This is not only true with architecture but in medicine, auto repair, law, etc. Freebies and undercutting your competitors fees is a fact of life and I have seen this done for the past 24 years – although I have never done anything for free nor made a conscious decision to charge less than my competitors.
-
My experience with cut prices is just an oposite. I beleive there is no such a thing as "free lunch" as we say. In construction industry I have seen so many times people undercut the the price of contract only to get the contract. Next step is than letter after letter trying to change this and that , claiming faults etc., demanding more money and applying pressure hoping to brake you down.
You cannot get Aston Martin and hoping to pay price of Skoda. It is just not possible. -
@solo said:
I believe it should read "better OR cheaper"
I think you might have missed the point "Better AND Cheaper"
In my business, (Software), once someone creates a piece of software, we can make something better and cheaper because the first developer already did the work to design the concept, flow and user interface.
It is then easy to make improvements and create a similar capability without having to learn from all the mistakes the first developer had to learn from and discard.
Al Hart
IRender nXt from Render Plus -
Ah! Point taken.
-
Great thread, but I'm surprised with all the talk about any work being offered for free as being wrong, that no-one has mentioned how much benefit people are getting from this free forum, from free ruby scripts, and even free SketchUp.
I think it was Ross some pages back who mentioned it could be of benefit to vanity or someone with a packaged houseplans business. For someone selling houseplans online, all it would take is one sale based on this to make it worthwhile to them.
Isn't it better to receive the offer, than not at all?
I agree that doing bespoke work from a professional architect almost certainly sends the wrong message. That seems like a different issue though. I'd love to see what academic research says about client perceptions of fees and pricing structure by architects. Might make for another interesting thread...
William
-
The Royal Institute of British Architects has undertaken a lot of excellent research and reading on the subject; search results for "fees" came up with 819 hits. They can be found here. Hit #1 is (as you would expect) of particular relevance regarding the relationship between fees and design quality. It can be found here.
-
Cheers for the links jackson, some interesting reading there.
-
Architects, lawyers, doctors, investment bankers, plumbers, gardeners, cobblers..., there are good ones, mediocre ones, and downright bad ones. Some charge high fees, some charge low fees. Caveat emptor.
-
I have not yet met great architect or product designer charging low fees. Great design demands considerate approach and a lot of testing which require time. It is as simple as that....
You might go easy on that coffee mate
Every time I see your avatar I go and switch on my espresso machine. -
Interesting thread. It has been my experience that many if not most clients do not understand what architects do, and therefore don't understand why our fees seem so high. After all, how long does it take to draw a building? They don't see the many hours of coordination, code and zoning research, meetings, and not to mention the act of designing itself. All they see is a final set of drawings, which by themselves may not have taken that long to execute. This is especially true with residential clients. The proliferation of house plan books doesn't help, either.
-
These do not help much either.
-
@sepo said:
I have not yet met great architect or product designer charging low fees. Great design demands considerate approach and a lot of testing which require time. It is as simple as that....
You might go easy on that coffee mate Every time I see your avatar I go and switch on my espresso machine.I have seen lots of so-called bigtime architects who cater to rich clients charge outrageous fees for uninspired designs and on the other hand I know a few young architects who work out of their homes and design stunning homes for much less. It's all relative...
I hope you are buying 'free trade' coffee. I just got back from Mexico and now pour tequila on my morning cereal.
-
DE, surely they are the more extreme cases and as such dont represent the majority of architects?
-
You are right, Solo, but I think the real problem with such software (including SU) is that they are so easy to use any Joe can come along and think since he knows how to use the software he thinks can design architecture.
-
@remus said:
DE, surely they are the more extreme cases and as such dont represent the majority of architects?
Perhaps its only a minority because young freash inspired tal;ent has to find a way to get business - so they go as cheap as possible until they can prove themselves worthy. And hopefully they don't turn into overpriced stagnant firms as they increase in age. But if they do, a new set of young inspired designers will compete with them at a lower price.
-
It reminds me of discussions I had years ago regarding the advertising business: "every client gets the advertising they deserve." Applies in architectue too -- hamstring the architect's freedom of design with too many requirements, or pay as little as possible, and the client will have hired a draftsman, not an inspired artist/engineer/sociologist/psycholigist and whatever else you want to throw into the mix of the job description.
And Sepo, you're not alone: when I see the DE avatar I get another cup too! (Free trade.)
-
Just an aside about the original subject: I understand that most architectural periodicals (at least in our parts, where they generally run at a loss) do not pay for the material they are given about the projects they publish. They might pay their critic, but usually the designer provides the images and plans free of charge.
Anssi
Advertisement