Why vote Obama?
-
@baker518 said:
@unknownuser said:
@baker518 said:
I edited the post that has caused the blood pressure problem with some of you, now go back to arguing with each other, rather than about me. I don't want to offend anyone and be banned, oh my.
Could you possibly F@K* off regardless?
I really don't understand what I said to provoke such a response. I'm glad to know that I'm not one of those people that think others should be banned for a post (until now). Regarding your language, it must be contagious and you have set a bad example that others think its OK to follow suit, regardless of position or title. I really shouldn't be surprised, considering this is a political discussion and tempers flare when we are passionate about the way we feel.
@baker518 said:
I really don't understand what I said to provoke such a response.
What can I say? You must be exeptionally dumb. There's really no other explanation. I feel sorry for ya. Want some stuff to play with, perhaps? Ball of yarn? Glue and paper? Stahlhelm? Swastika?
-
Relax, nobody is being banned. This is the corner bar a place to rant.
grow a chin.
-
@unknownuser said:
@baker518 said:
I edited the post that has caused the blood pressure problem with some of you, now go back to arguing with each other, rather than about me. I don't want to offend anyone and be banned, oh my.
Could you possibly F@K* off regardless?
I really don't understand what I said to provoke such a response. I'm glad to know that I'm not one of those people that think others should be banned for a post (until now). Regarding your implied language, it must be contagious and you have set a bad example that others think its OK to follow suit, regardless of position or title. I really shouldn't be surprised, considering this is a political discussion and tempers flare when we are passionate about the way we feel.
-
All I did was to submit a post that I read, and like many do, shared it with others. Sometimes if you share things you read with others, they can shed light on it and you see it for what it really is. You didn't offer any kind of explanation or interpretation, you just went off the deep end with it.
You didn't have to read it, but you did. If you feel violated by something you read, then maybe you shouldn't let your curiosity get the best of you and read things posted on the internet. It sounds to me that you may have an anger management issue.
By the way, what country are you from?
-
@baker518 said:
It sounds to me that you may have an anger management issue.
Right - how 'bout you don't lay off of the haloperidol? If you post links to neo fascist sites, you're bound to reap upset responses. You know that - a kid would. Don't go all 'oooh, I didn't see that coming' on me now. That's the coward's approach, isn't it?
-
Stinkin, I'll have to give you credit for teaching me something today. I didn't know what a Stahlhelm was and I had to go look it up, thanks.
-
Obama is campaigning in Arizona. LOL if he wins.
-
@baker518 said:
Stinkin, I'll have to give you credit for teaching me something today. I didn't know what a Stahlhelm was and I had to go look it up, thanks.
Glad to be of service, obviously. You gonna chrochet a couple, with Christmas coming up?
-
I'm glad to know you have something to hang on to out of all of this. You never did say what country you are from.
-
Another reason for voting Obama
-
@rickw said:
A new study from UCLA shows that FDR's policies, rather than ending the Great Depression, actually prolonged it by 7 years.
As the US slides towards a depression that ultimately has some of its roots in Dem social policies, do we really want the House, Senate, and White House going to Dems who intend to implement FDR-type government programs?
Tighten your belts, everyone.
And related to the CRA, I laughed through the tears to hear Barney Frank spew about "reform" and more regulation - this coming from the idiot who for the last 5 years blocked reform of Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac, while claiming there were no problems with them. The only thing he could do to help the situation is resign.
Even Bill Clinton blamed Frank and other Congressional Dems for the problem. The Democratic Congress has an approval rating half that of President Bush, and we want to elect more Dems? Insanity.
I actually heard this yesterday from my client; a reasoned and intelligent CEO. This is not unlike my "Bar Stool Economics" thread which shows the dangers of governmental interference into basic free market forces. I swear, some left wingnuts actually think they can alter the supply-demand axiom. This is sheer lunacy. Apparently, it's Rooseveltian.
I worry about the current liberal Congress being caressed by what would be the most liberal president we will have ever had. The financial markets will not like this and the worsened economic malaise will trickle down to those 95% getting the big give away. And when that happens, the shit will hit the fan. You think things are bad now? Who the hell would they blame then? Surely not themselves...
EDIT: I did a little rewording of the second paragraph for clarity. -
From the evil MSNBC .... too funny.
It appears that McCain has been linked to Rashid Khalidi..too funny, and McCain was trying to use it to nail Obama that donated $80.000 to a Khalidi cause when in fact McCain had forgotten he donated $480.000 back when Khalidi represented the PLO.
You cannot write this stuff funnier.
And then there is Palin and Giuliani selling this bull to the Jews in Florida (as apparently Khalidi is anti-semetic) only to discover McCain has a closer association to him and ...wait for it...Ayers...OMG!!
I love this silly season, what ever am I to do from Wednesday?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#27464383
That's what happens when you throw crap at fans, it blows back at ya ....you betcha it does.
-
i don't think he's the most liberal ever.
-
Started to post this in the "election laughs" thread...but seems, according to my sensibilites anyway, to really belong here:
-
@bellwells said:
@rickw said:
A new study from UCLA shows that FDR's policies, rather than ending the Great Depression, actually prolonged it by 7 years.
As the US slides towards a depression that ultimately has some of its roots in Dem social policies, do we really want the House, Senate, and White House going to Dems who intend to implement FDR-type government programs?
Tighten your belts, everyone.
And related to the CRA, I laughed through the tears to hear Barney Frank spew about "reform" and more regulation - this coming from the idiot who for the last 5 years blocked reform of Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac, while claiming there were no problems with them. The only thing he could do to help the situation is resign.
Even Bill Clinton blamed Frank and other Congressional Dems for the problem. The Democratic Congress has an approval rating half that of President Bush, and we want to elect more Dems? Insanity.
I actually heard this yesterday from my client; a reasoned and intelligent CEO. This is not unlike my "Bar Stool Economics" thread which shows the dangers of governmental interference into basic free market forces. I swear, some left wingnuts actually think they can alter the supply-demand axiom. This is sheer lunacy. Apparently, it's Rooseveltian.
I worry about the current liberal Congress being caressed by what would be the most liberal president we will have ever had. The financial markets will not like this and the worsened economic malaise will trickle down to those 95% getting the big give away. And when that happens, the shit will hit the fan. You think things are bad now? Who the hell would they blame then? Surely not themselves...
EDIT: I did a little rewording of the second paragraph for clarity.One of the things you can trust in life is for an economist to make up crap theories and predictions. One economist thats bucked the trend is Gillian Tett who predicted that we were heading into recenssion 2 years ago.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/oct/31/creditcrunch-gillian-tett-financial-times
-
Tomsdesk wrote:
@unknownuser said:
Started to post this in the "election laughs" thread...but seems, according to my sensibilites anyway, to really belong here:
Dang! talk about stupidity and mean, unfortunately that sort of reaction is becoming an expected behavior. In Plano, Texas a mother was caught keying all cars in her kids school parking lot which had an Obama sticker on it.
-
@tomsdesk said:
Started to post this in the "election laughs" thread...but seems, according to my sensibilites anyway, to really belong here:
-
Serves them right always looking for handouts, the little commies.
Now look. Obama has an illegal alien aunt, and he didn't even know it. She also has been funneling him funds illegally, about $250. This could be October surprise Palin / McCain need!
-
@solo said:
Dang! talk about stupidity and mean, unfortunately that sort of reaction is becoming an expected behavior. In Plano, Texas a mother was caught keying all cars in her kids school parking lot which had an Obama sticker on it.
I'm sure you news savvy guys are aware similar things are happening on your side as well. You may have missed it, as it's probably not on MSNBC.
-
Here is a reason NOT to vote for Obama....that is if you have the same mindset as the below (ugly blond woman gets annoying however)
[flash=425,344:3s0llvii]http://www.youtube.com/v/KjxzmaXAg9E[/flash:3s0llvii]
Advertisement