sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    Wards Kerkythea Renders (various buildings)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Gallery
    16 Posts 6 Posters 4.0k Views 6 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • StinkieS Offline
      Stinkie
      last edited by

      @hfm said:

      Heel erg saai stinkie

      That's what I said. πŸ˜„ Just wanted to point out there's more to presentation than pretty pictures.

      As fo the pictures, something I forgot to mention: Ward, you may want to check out Kim Frederik's "Getting Started" tutorial and the materials repository over at the KT website.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R Offline
        remus
        last edited by

        Seems stinkie covered the text pretty well, i'll do the models (dont get too demoralised from all the crits btw. heyre pretty damm good really, but its always good to aim for perfection.)

        First thing, i reckon you need a background for your renders. They look pretty amuteurish with just the gradient background. Either you can use an HDR map for your background (i think kerkythea supports them, need confirmation though) or you could just put the model in to a photo using ps. If you can be bothered to fiddle about with them, id say HDRs are the way to go as they will give you reflections from the environment and generally make your scene look better.

        Second thing id recommend is to put the models in a bit more context. An environment map (the HDR i was talking about before) would probably help with this, but adding a few massed out surroundings cant do any harm.

        Final thing is to go for some more interesting camera angles. Of the things ive mentioned this is definitely the easiest to play around with, so its definitely worth playing around with it. Very generally id say try and go for angles that are either eye level or birds eye view, although this is very sweeping. The bottom line is its best experiment. Oh and dont forget field of view, it can make your shots look a lot more exciting.

        And dont forget to have fun, thats probably the most important part πŸ˜„

        http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • EddyNLE Offline
          EddyNL
          last edited by

          @ Stinkie
          Thanks for the feedback.
          I didn't really pay a lot of attention to the text. 😳 I just wanted to present my models and give a brief description. I'll put some more time and effort in the text part next time!

          @ HFM
          The water is made using Dielectric glass material in KT.
          Adding a water ripple bumpmap to it and tweaking some settings. I really like the result!

          @ Remus
          Thanks for your comment. I'll get back to you on the usage of skies and backgrounds.
          I'm having some trouble in KT getting them right.

          Anyways... I've only been here a day, but I learned quite a few things. Thanks guys!

          viewtopic.php?f=271&t=11903 Modelling my city for Google Earth!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • StinkieS Offline
            Stinkie
            last edited by

            @eduardonl said:

            @ Stinkie Thanks for the feedback. I didn't really pay a lot of attention to the text.

            No-one ever does, mate! And that's where geeks like me come in. Oh yeah, forgot to mention: I like the sketches. Maybe give 'em a little more prominent place in your presentation?

            Also, don't use the textures that come with SU. They suck. I think I mentioned the KT mats repository. Check out Maxwell's MXM Gallery, too. Useful texture maps in there.

            Using decent textures is very, very important.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • EddyNLE Offline
              EddyNL
              last edited by

              New render of Sail Appartements. 😎

              http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/6843/newsmallyy1.jpg

              viewtopic.php?f=271&t=11903 Modelling my city for Google Earth!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • FrederikF Offline
                Frederik
                last edited by

                @remus said:

                Either you can use an HDR map for your background (i think kerkythea supports them, need confirmation though)

                Of course KT supports HDRI's... πŸ˜‰

                Cheers
                Kim Frederik

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • StinkieS Offline
                  Stinkie
                  last edited by

                  ... and it's got a tree library too, if I'm correct. πŸ˜‰

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • R Offline
                    remus
                    last edited by

                    Frederik, i suspected as much.

                    i like the new render of the sail apartments btw. I think the background helps a lot, although im bound to say that.

                    http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • N Offline
                      notareal
                      last edited by

                      @unknownuser said:

                      ... and it's got a tree library too, if I'm correct. πŸ˜‰

                      There is some really nice trees in KT model library, look at KT download area and model selection in KT forums.

                      Welcome to try [Thea Render](http://www.thearender.com/), Thea support | [kerkythea.net](http://www.kerkythea.net/) -team member

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • EddyNLE Offline
                        EddyNL
                        last edited by

                        I found those trees allright... took my computer almost 3 mins. to open the model. Rendering takes ages! 😞

                        viewtopic.php?f=271&t=11903 Modelling my city for Google Earth!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • FrederikF Offline
                          Frederik
                          last edited by

                          @eduardonl said:

                          I found those trees allright... took my computer almost 3 mins. to open the model. Rendering takes ages! 😞

                          Of course the render time will increase when using some of the Xfrog trees available... πŸ˜‰
                          Please remember that it's high poly 3D trees... πŸ˜„

                          What render preset are you using..?? πŸ˜•
                          For an outdoor scene like this you should try preset no. 17 (Path Trasing - Progressive)... πŸ˜‰
                          After about 50 passes, your render should look fairly crisp, and with some instanced Xfrog trees, I would imagine that it should only take about 60 minutes to reach, which IMHO is fair when using such high quality 3D trees... πŸ˜‰

                          Cheers
                          Kim Frederik

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • EddyNLE Offline
                            EddyNL
                            last edited by

                            I need to buy a new computer... πŸ‘Ž
                            I like to make models in SU and render them in Kerkythea, just to see the result. I'm not (yet) aiming for a perfect, crips clean render. (which would take me hours)

                            @ Frederik
                            Setting are on preset no. 6
                            no. 17 takes a bit too long, can you recommend any other settings?

                            viewtopic.php?f=271&t=11903 Modelling my city for Google Earth!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • FrederikF Offline
                              Frederik
                              last edited by

                              @eduardonl said:

                              Setting are on preset no. 6
                              no. 17 takes a bit too long, can you recommend any other settings?

                              Preset 6 is good, but it all depends on the complexity of your scene... πŸ˜‰
                              Sometimes preset 6 will take much longer...

                              Like I said... For an exterior scene like this, with only the sun to light it up, preset no. 17 is my preferred... πŸ˜‰

                              ❗ Remember...
                              Although it shows 10000 passes before it's finished, you can finish it at any stage and by experience you will learn that the scene usually is crisp and clean after 50-60 passes... πŸ˜„

                              If you insert som instanced Xfrog trees, I'm sure that preset 6 will take much longer compared to preset 17... πŸ˜‰

                              Cheers
                              Kim Frederik

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • 1 / 1
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Buy SketchPlus
                              Buy SUbD
                              Buy WrapR
                              Buy eBook
                              Buy Modelur
                              Buy Vertex Tools
                              Buy SketchCuisine
                              Buy FormFonts

                              Advertisement