What rub....I mean jewells for house design
-
Any recommendations from design pros for rubys to enhance the house design process? Operations like layer and group management, line weights, text and component placements and their rotation before placement? Yes, I know Su isn't cad, I think that's why it is so cool!
-
+++ moving this to RUBY section +++
-
Actually lots of people are speaking about the "semantic web" Tagging is a nice thing I think, but the mental models behind seem to get simplified too much. I've seen it very often in the past: I.e. there is a subforum for Ruby things, so any thread, where the word "Ruby" is written, has to be moved to the Ruby subforum. Don't know why this happens, I just think it wasn't rhankc's intention really talking about the Ruby aspect of the scripts but rather the aspect of usability and experience with them. I think, a Ruby developer can't really tell you, whether a Ruby script is useful or not in the modelling process. He would say "Of course, use Ruby scripts whereever you can." without throwing an eye on the build-in functions.
But do not misinterpret this posting, such things happen in the whole WWW. Some days ago I've seen it in the German Ruby forum.
Maybe I'm wrong,
azuby -
I see different rub...I mean jewels to enhance the SU experience, I am finding designing in SU so easy, It plays well with others, raster images work, dwgs work, the file structure is simple, groups and layer system is very nice, SU into my cad is awesome, though I'd rather stay outta there. I see developers mentioning add-in programs that are furthering the SU experience, and making it possible to wean us off cad as we knew it. there are scripts and command structures imulating all the things we loved about our respective cad programs, thus I ask the question: What favorite commnands are you pros finding to help you get to the deliverable "the drawings are on paper" and I'm finished with this job: pay me stage? It seems the rub... developers can make SU do anything!
Advertisement