Starting CADVRter beta powerful 3D/CAD/VR conversion

ashraf

As a software developer and at the same time a software user, I understand the two points, if we create something only good for us as developers, users will buy from another vendor, on the other hand if we do not have revenue we can not allocate resources to update, support, and add more formats.

We really are trying our best to make this Win/Win and provide users with the best offer we can.

CADVRter gives access to a large number of formats, with texture support (for most of formats) , supports exporting to USDZ, GLTF, FBX optimized for VR.

Do you think $49/year is expensive?

dedmin

@ashraf said:

Do you think $49/year is expensive?

Compare to what? Where is the perpetual licence and upgrade price? See - we don't have a choice!
With more than 20 years as a CAD user I can tell you BUYING is my insurance to survive when things go bad - I can't afford subscription in my part of the world!

ashraf

Compared to other tools and plugins available today.

Your input is of high value and I promise to discuss it and try to find a path.

If you have few minutes now get a trial and tell me as a software how does it feel, do you like the user experience.

rv1974

ashraf, we desperately need rock-solid skp->fbx converter with 'combine by material' option , (smoothing groups and textures position is must too of course).
Is it doable?

ashraf

@rv1974 said:

ashraf, we desperately need rock-solid skp->fbx converter with 'combine by material' option , (smoothing groups and textures position is must too of course).
Is it doable?

This is already included you need to check the optimize for VR option in the FBX output settings.

As shown in the following image

ashraf

@rv1974 said:

Well I have bad results
40mb skp was converted to 800kb fbx (almost empty, some cameras and a couple of faces).
I could PM some examples, would you like to try?

Of course, this will be of great value for us.
Please send us the SKP and inform us if you were testing on Windows or Mac.

rv1974

For some reason I could never get good results with any of SimLab converters (incl. Cadverter).
The main problem is it does not keep original orientation of faces.
When I import those fbx files (made of skp) into Max tons of faces are flipped.
I could PM some examples, would you like to try?

numerobis

I would be more interested in a good working SKP to 3DSmax file linking... The only solution i know is Mirza Link Manager, but it combines by material and doesn't support Instances...

rv1974

I PM-ed you. Thanks in advance, Ashraf.

rv1974

@numerobis said:

I would be more interested in a good working SKP to 3DSmax file linking... The only solution i know is Mirza Link Manager, but it combines by material and doesn't support Instances...

0 support there. He never answers. But the main issue is his Link Manager just freezes on more or less serious files. 'Combine by material' is the most valuable thing ever. If you need instances then open original skp in max. The problem is Max does not 'understands' skp hierarchy- only lowest level of instances will be kept.

ashraf

I tested the model.
It worked with merging, took few minutes I will review more though it is a large model

Here is the result in Microosft Viewer

Following is result in SimLab VR Viewer

Will instigate speed more on Monday.

rv1974

I re-checked fbx model both in Max 2017 and 2020. Normals are messed up everywhere.
Microsoft viewer does not indicates normals' direction (Maybe you've got Max installed by mistake?) There's a tiny chance that it's Max importer that spoils your fbx but I guess is not the case.
I expected to get an fbx containing approx. 50 meshes only (by the number of materials in file). I received almost 30K objects instead (mainly junk groups). Their creation must be blocked.
If you combine by material all those groups have no meaning!
3.Everything is badly triangulated.
I need object naming by its material name. Is it possible?
Thank you for attention

Capture.PNG-222.PNG

Capture.PNG-3333.PNG

ashraf

@rv1974 said:

I re-checked fbx model both in Max 2017 and 2020. Normals are messed up everywhere.
Microsoft viewer does not indicates normals' direction (Maybe you've got Max installed by mistake?) There's a tiny chance that it's Max importer that spoils your fbx but I guess is not the case.

I expected to get an fbx containing approx. 50 meshes only (by the number of materials in file). I received almost 30K objects instead (mainly junk groups). Their creation must be blocked.
If you combine by material all those groups have no meaning!
3.Everything is badly triangulated.

I need object naming by its material name. Is it possible?
Thank you for attention

Thank for for the great input, most of those are easy to fix issues, hopefully we will be able to address them during the beta period, if you see CADVRter of value to you and you are interested in speeding things up you can communicate our suppor@simlab-soft.com

We will do our best to make this an essential tool that simplifies workflow. This being one of many many use cases that will be simplified.

rv1974

I contacted supporT
Thank you

rv1974

In addition to challenges I mentioned above:
5. 'combine by material' is not OK yet- there are still multiple meshes with the same material. The goal is one material=one mesh (meanwhile there are 60 materials and 140 meshes)
6. Insanely over-complicated hierarchy of fbx I've got (mentioned in p.2) leads to heavy lags
inside Max. It takes lots of efforts to delete all those helpers manually.

I'd seriously check the possibility to develop SimLab Skp-Max Link Manager (I mean a Max plugin, able to to deal with heavy geometry). It'd have a good potential

ashraf

@rv1974 said:

I'd seriously check the possibility to develop SimLab Skp-Max Link Manager (I mean a Max plugin, able to to deal with heavy geometry). It'd have a good potential

Thank you for the suggestion, though this is a great idea, our hope is to add more geometry processing for large models in CADVRter, so more users can benefit from it, using different applications, and going through different formats.

rv1974

My suggestion is based on your background- you have tons of discreet importers\exporters for numerous programs (we bought some btw). Creating universal and flawlessone-click translator undoubtedly has a great potential too.