sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • 登入
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    3D Truss Models

    已排程 已置頂 已鎖定 已移動 Plugins
    1.5k 貼文 31 Posters 869.8k 瀏覽 30 Watching
    正在載入更多貼文
    • 從舊到新
    • 從新到舊
    • 最多點贊
    回覆
    • 在新貼文中回覆
    登入後回覆
    此主題已被刪除。只有擁有主題管理權限的使用者可以查看。
    • medeekM 離線
      medeek
      最後由 編輯

      Updated screenshot of the gambrel attic menu:

      http://design.medeek.com/resources/images/truss_su120_800.jpg

      This is getting pretty close to the final form that this menu will take.

      It's actually really amazing what can be done with SVG and javascript, definitely not my forte but after this exercise I feel like I can probably construct anything with this combo if required.

      Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
      Medeek Engineering Inc
      design.medeek.com

      1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
      • facerF 離線
        facer
        最後由 編輯

        Medeek,
        Menu works fine.

        Do you have a "reset" to return to original values?

        The "Max Truss Height" I assume is the red dashed line in the diagram.
        To add clarity would a small red dash line after the menu text help?

        Seems you are enjoying yourself, keep up the good work.

        1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
        • medeekM 離線
          medeek
          最後由 編輯

          With the graphical menus you will notice a slight delay once the "submit" button is clicked. This is to allow for a quick display of a status message, however I'm finding this delay to be annoying and may eliminate it altogether to speed the use of the new GUI.

          Also note that with gambrel attic trusses the non-graphical geometry menu is still an option if you turn off the GUI flag in the global settings. For some people this may be easier but I think the new preview pane is a major design asset when it comes to this type of roof.

          I'm thinking it might be useful to implement this same type of preview/GUI for regular attic trusses so that one can preview the configuration before committing. Now that I've been down this road once it won't be such a struggle. Most of the other truss types are fairly simple and a preview image is probably not warranted unless the users say otherwise.

          I feel that the preview window goes a long way in helping explain what each term is in the input geometry menu but I may also add in some pop up windows (?) that display diagrams or other explanatory notes to help the less educated users.

          large_thumbnail.jpg

          Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
          Medeek Engineering Inc
          design.medeek.com

          1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
          • medeekM 離線
            medeek
            最後由 編輯

            Version 1.5.5 - 04.29.2016

            • Added Gambrel Attic truss type, configurations: (AUTO w/ piggyback trusses).
            • Added a graphical user interface (GUI) for gambrel attic geometry input.

            http://design.medeek.com/resources/images/truss_su121_800.jpg

            A reset button would be useful to return the GUI to the default values. There is still a lot of work to be done with the gambrel attic truss type:

            • Advanced Options
            • Gable Trusses
            • Default or Reset Button
            • Metric Input

            View models here:

            Link Preview Image
            3D Warehouse

            3D Warehouse is a website of searchable, pre-made 3D models that works seamlessly with SketchUp.

            favicon

            (3dwarehouse.sketchup.com)

            Link Preview Image
            3D Warehouse

            3D Warehouse is a website of searchable, pre-made 3D models that works seamlessly with SketchUp.

            favicon

            (3dwarehouse.sketchup.com)

            Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
            Medeek Engineering Inc
            design.medeek.com

            1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
            • medeekM 離線
              medeek
              最後由 編輯

              This is the level of detail I am aiming for with the advanced options for gambrel attic roofs (minus the truss plates):

              https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/t31.0-8/13131738_10208476408255049_4068722961615908164_o.jpg

              Notice the structural outlookers with gable end trusses and the prow roof (option). I've got my work cut out for me.

              Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
              Medeek Engineering Inc
              design.medeek.com

              1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
              • medeekM 離線
                medeek
                最後由 編輯

                The updated truss yard:

                Medeek Truss Yard 3

                Sixteen different truss profiles currently available within the Medeek Truss Plugin:

                • Common
                • Monopitch
                • Attic
                • Scissor
                • Tail Bearing
                • Dual Pitch
                • Bowstring
                • Bow Barrel
                • Polynesian
                • Cambered
                • Cathedral
                • Tray
                • Mono Scissor
                • Mono Cathedral
                • Gambrel Attic
                • Floor (System 42)

                View model here:

                Link Preview Image
                3D Warehouse

                3D Warehouse is a website of searchable, pre-made 3D models that works seamlessly with SketchUp.

                favicon

                (3dwarehouse.sketchup.com)

                Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                Medeek Engineering Inc
                design.medeek.com

                1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                • medeekM 離線
                  medeek
                  最後由 編輯

                  I am wondering how many of your designers/architects/contractors/builders out there have used Open Joist products?

                  Link Preview Image
                  TRIFORCE® Open Joist: Peace of Mind Underfoot

                  The TRIFORCE® open joist is a state-of-the-art product in the forefront of the construction industry.

                  favicon

                  TRIFORCE® Open Joist (www.openjoisttriforce.com)

                  I was thinking I might add their product line to the Floor Joist/Truss module.

                  http://www.openjoisttriforce.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/prod-caract-ajust-img3-eng1.jpg

                  Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                  Medeek Engineering Inc
                  design.medeek.com

                  1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                  • medeekM 離線
                    medeek
                    最後由 編輯

                    Version 1.5.6 - 05.11.2016

                    • The plugin now automatically checks for updates.
                    • Option added in Global Settings to adjust frequency of "check for updates" or to disable this feature entirely.

                    I've also added in the Open Joist (TriForce) floor truss but it is not quite ready for release so I have disabled it until the next version release.

                    Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                    Medeek Engineering Inc
                    design.medeek.com

                    1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                    • JQLJ 離線
                      JQL
                      最後由 編輯

                      Hi again medeek,

                      I haven't used open joist yet but I will.

                      The only problem I see with it is that it's idea is very interesting but I think fire regulations don't allow for it to be visible.

                      I might be wrong in some cases though, so I'm waiting for them to show up in front of me.

                      Keep up your excellent work!

                      www.casca.pt
                      Visit us on facebook!

                      1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                      • medeekM 離線
                        medeek
                        最後由 編輯

                        @jql said:

                        Hi again medeek,
                        The only problem I see with it is that it's idea is very interesting but I think fire regulations don't allow for it to be visible.

                        According to recent research Open Joist trusses seem to perform better in fires than both I-Joists and MPC wood floor trusses. However, there is plenty of debate on the matter.

                        http://www.brackenengineering.com/Portals/0/White%20Papers/White%20Paper%20-%20Fire-Load%20Performance.pdf

                        Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                        Medeek Engineering Inc
                        design.medeek.com

                        1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                        • JQLJ 離線
                          JQL
                          最後由 編輯

                          I'm recently dealing with a lot of heritage buildings where wood is used (I haven't found any truss similar to the ones in your impressive set yet though) and what our consultants do, so we can build with visible wood on new structures, is to over dimension them. However with such thin profiles I bet this can't be achieved.

                          Do you have any take on that?

                          www.casca.pt
                          Visit us on facebook!

                          1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                          • pbacotP 離線
                            pbacot
                            最後由 編輯

                            @medeek said:

                            @jql said:

                            Hi again medeek,
                            The only problem I see with it is that it's idea is very interesting but I think fire regulations don't allow for it to be visible.

                            According to recent research Open Joist trusses seem to perform better in fires than both I-Joists and MPC wood floor trusses. However, there is plenty of debate on the matter.

                            http://www.brackenengineering.com/Portals/0/White%20Papers/White%20Paper%20-%20Fire-Load%20Performance.pdf

                            How is this different from the floor trusses you are now doing --or are you talking about this specific manufacturer? They seem to use OSB on part of the trusses for some reason...(Oh, I guess so you can cut to fit in the field?).

                            To clarify. Isn't "open" joist just referring to the product name (and the fact that the truss system is open as opposed to a solid joist. I don't think this necessarily means it's exposed. I doubt many would leave these trusses exposed, but the fire requirement depends on the type of building and/or the floor's rating.

                            MacOSX MojaveSketchUp Pro v19 Twilight v2 Thea v3 PowerCADD

                            1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                            • medeekM 離線
                              medeek
                              最後由 編輯

                              Sorry for all of the confusing terminology.

                              Open Joist refers to a specific product produced by Barrette in Quebec Canada.

                              There two main products are:

                              Open Joist 2000
                              Open Joist TriForce

                              The thing that makes these floor trusses different from your standard MPC wood floor truss is that they use finger jointed webs instead of metal plates. The floor trusses are made entirely of wood and glue with no metal connectors.

                              Link Preview Image
                              TRIFORCE® Open Joist: Peace of Mind Underfoot

                              The TRIFORCE® open joist is a state-of-the-art product in the forefront of the construction industry.

                              favicon

                              TRIFORCE® Open Joist (www.openjoisttriforce.com)

                              They come in standard sizes and lengths with a field trimmable end. They are installed similar to I-Joists using a rim board at the perimeter of the floor.

                              Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                              Medeek Engineering Inc
                              design.medeek.com

                              1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                              • JQLJ 離線
                                JQL
                                最後由 編輯

                                Pbacot,

                                I meant I like them exposed not that they should be exposed.

                                www.casca.pt
                                Visit us on facebook!

                                1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                • medeekM 離線
                                  medeek
                                  最後由 編輯

                                  Building code in the US usually requires some form of 1 hour rated covering (ie. 1/2" gypsum).

                                  Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                                  Medeek Engineering Inc
                                  design.medeek.com

                                  1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                  • JQLJ 離線
                                    JQL
                                    最後由 編輯

                                    In here it's the same, however, if we can prove that the wooden structure will hold one hour more than needed, because of extra thickness, we don't need the covering. This can't be done with steel as heat makes it loose physical properties much faster than what happens with wood.

                                    www.casca.pt
                                    Visit us on facebook!

                                    1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                    • medeekM 離線
                                      medeek
                                      最後由 編輯

                                      For large agricultural buildings a double inverted truss can be employed to provide a large vaulted span for machinery:

                                      http://www.lakecountrytruss.ca/images/trusses/double_inverted_large.jpg

                                      I am wondering if this truss type is still commonly used by anyone for this type of application and whether it would be of interest, enough for me to add it into the growing list of trusses within the plugin.

                                      Also if anyone has any shop drawings they could send me that would be very helpful.

                                      Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                                      Medeek Engineering Inc
                                      design.medeek.com

                                      1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                      • medeekM 離線
                                        medeek
                                        最後由 編輯

                                        A quick study of a double inverted truss by taking two 24' howe trusses and joining them to form a double truss. Note that the 4:12 pitch of the original trusses is maintained and the interior vault is exactly 8:12 pitch.

                                        http://design.medeek.com/resources/images/truss_su122_800.jpg

                                        View model here:

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        3D Warehouse

                                        3D Warehouse is a website of searchable, pre-made 3D models that works seamlessly with SketchUp.

                                        favicon

                                        (3dwarehouse.sketchup.com)

                                        My question with this configuration is how the top and bottom chords at the peak should butt up? For example should the bottom chords at the peak have a double scarf cut or a single scarf cut? Some shop drawings would help in determining what is common practice.

                                        Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                                        Medeek Engineering Inc
                                        design.medeek.com

                                        1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                        • medeekM 離線
                                          medeek
                                          最後由 編輯

                                          Version 1.5.7 - 05.15.2016

                                          • Added Scissor truss type, configurations: (4/2, 6/4).
                                          • Structural outlookers (vert. & horz.) enabled under advanced roof options for Scissor (4/2, 6/4) truss types.

                                          http://design.medeek.com/resources/images/truss_su123_800.jpg

                                          View model here:

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          3D Warehouse

                                          3D Warehouse is a website of searchable, pre-made 3D models that works seamlessly with SketchUp.

                                          favicon

                                          (3dwarehouse.sketchup.com)

                                          I also updated the pause in the truss selector GUI from 700 ms to 400 ms. Still more work to be done with raised heels and structural outlookers for some of these configurations but its getting close.

                                          Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                                          Medeek Engineering Inc
                                          design.medeek.com

                                          1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                          • medeekM 離線
                                            medeek
                                            最後由 編輯

                                            Coffer Truss Algorithm:

                                            http://design.medeek.com/resources/truss/GEOMETRY/COFFER1_800.jpg

                                            This is assuming that the coffer span is centered on the truss. A non-centered coffer algorithm could get significantly more interesting and difficult.

                                            Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                                            Medeek Engineering Inc
                                            design.medeek.com

                                            1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 74
                                            • 75
                                            • 4 / 75
                                            • 第一個貼文
                                              最後的貼文
                                            Buy SketchPlus
                                            Buy SUbD
                                            Buy WrapR
                                            Buy eBook
                                            Buy Modelur
                                            Buy Vertex Tools
                                            Buy SketchCuisine
                                            Buy FormFonts

                                            Advertisement