Help Understanding Classes and Class objects

Dan Rathbun

There is still a basic grouping protocol steps that are out of sequence in your original example, and in mine above.

Can you figure out what the proper sequence is ???

(If not... say so, we'll show you what the proper sequence is.)

thomthom

Also - when creating Group with the API you create the group first - then add the entities directly into the group. As oppose to when you model in SketchUp where you draw the geometry - then group.

TIG

You CAN make a group from existing entities gp=entities.add_group(array_of_entities)... BUT if those entities are not all in the same context OR if their context is NOT the active_entities then you will get a Bugsplat.
If you are making new entities then it is best to make them inside the desired context in the first place - using a new [initially] empty group gp=entities.add_group();gp.entities.add_face(points) to get the face etc.
Doing this also removes the risk of your new geometry clashing with some existing geometry in the active_context - e.g. overlapping faces, which will intersect unexpectedly if not separated from the very creation of your new face.
The only time I would suggest you want even to think about making a group from existing objects... is when you are using a user's [premade] selection - because they can only select objects in the 'active_entities' context then you can safely group those objects [or a filtered sub-set of them - e.g. just faces and edges] into a new group that is made in the same context, thus: gp=model.active_entities.add_group(model.selection.to_a) will make a group of the current selection.

Dan Rathbun

@dan rathbun said:

There is still a basic grouping protocol steps that are out of sequence in your original example, and in mine above.

Can you figure out what the proper sequence is ???

@thomthom said:

... when creating Group with the API you create the group first - then add the entities directly into the group. As oppose to when you model in SketchUp where you draw the geometry - then group.

Thomas gave away the answer.

So ... lets see the my example, using this protocol.

We will first create the conveyor group, add a temporary construction point to it, so SU does not clean it up, then past that parent group's entities reference into the other method, and have the subordinate method add it's subgroup to the parent group. Finally we will add pully primitives to the subgroup and return it's reference.

module Magans
 
  class Conveyor
 
    # make @group var and .group() instance method;
    attr_reader(;group)
 
    private
 
    def initialize(st_point, end_point)
 
        @st_point = st_point
        @end_point = end_point
 
        ents = Sketchup.active_model.active_entities
 
        # hold reference to group;
        @group = ents.add_group()
        cpt = @group.entities.add_cpoint(ORIGIN)
        @group.name = "CONVEYOR ASSY"
       
        # pully1
        create_end_pully(@group.entities,@st_point,36,18)
 
        # pully2
        create_end_pully(@group.entities,@end_point,36,18)
        
        cpt.erase!
       
    end #of initialize()
 
    def create_end_pully(ents,pts,width,length)
       
        pt1 =[pts[0] - (width/2),pts[1],pts[2]]
        pt2 =[pts[0] - (width/2),pts[1]+length,pts[2]]
        pt3 =[pts[0] + (width/2),pts[1]+length,pts[2]]
        pt4 =[pts[0] + (width/2),pts[1],pts[2]]
       
        subgroup = ents.add_group()
        face = subgroup.entities.add_face( pt1,pt2,pt3,pt4 )
        subgroup.name = "END PULLEY"

        face.reverse!
        face.pushpull( 5 )
 
        # return the pully's group reference;
        return subgroup
 
    end #of create_end_pully()
 
    public
 
    # Example "wrapper" methods
 
    def name()
       return @group.name
    end #of name()
 
    def valid?()
       return @group.valid?
    end #of name()
 
  end #of Conveyor class
 
end # module Magans

pmagans

First of all I would like to thank you guys for all of the help. My thought process was skewed in the wrong direction and I don't think I would've come up with the passing the group object. Also starting with the group and then adding the entities is now clear in my head. I had read that before in other posts but could never quite understand the "how". That was where I was hopelessly stuck for the past day. I have re-written the previous code and module-ized it and it works perfectly.

I kept the classes for Conveyor and EndPulley seperate so that I can use both seperately for inheritance in the future.

I still need to check into "Wrapper" classes further for how I can implement them effectively.

The only snag was I had to remove the private designation for the methods under the Conveyor class to work. I'm not really certain why.

module Pmagans
	# Type in Console
	# load 'Conveyor/CONVEYOR2.rb'
	# conv = Pmagans;;Conveyor.new([0,0,0], [0,120,0])
	
	class Conveyor
		#make the @group var and .group()instance
		attr_reader(;group)
		
		#private #why does this need to be private?		
		def initialize(st_point, end_point)
			ents = Sketchup.active_model.entities
			
			@st_point = st_point
			@end_point = end_point
			
			#hold reference to group;
			@group = ents.add_group()
			cpt = @group.entities.add_cpoint(ORIGIN)
			@group.name = "CONVEYOR ASSY"
						
			self.create_geometry
			cpt.erase!
			
		end #of initialize()
	
		def create_geometry()
			ents = Sketchup.active_model.entities
			puts ents.length
			
			#pulley 1
			st_ep = EndPulley.new(@group, @st_point)
			
			#pulley 2
			end_ep = EndPulley.new(@group, @end_point)
			
			puts ents.length
			
		end #of create_geometry()
	
	end #of Conveyor class
	
	
	
	class EndPulley
			attr_reader(;group)
			
		def initialize(conv_group, ins_pt)
			#TODO; add *args if a group not passed to EndPulley just "create_geometry"
			@conv_group = conv_group
			@ins_pt = ins_pt
			
			self.create_geometry
			
		end #of initialize()
		
		def create_geometry()
			pts = @ins_pt
			width = 36
			length = 18
			
			ents = Sketchup.active_model.entities
			pt1 =[pts[0] - (width/2),pts[1],pts[2]]
			pt2 =[pts[0] - (width/2),pts[1]+length,pts[2]]
			pt3 =[pts[0] + (width/2),pts[1]+length,pts[2]]
			pt4 =[pts[0] + (width/2),pts[1],pts[2]]
	
			@group = @conv_group.entities.add_group()
			face = @group.entities.add_face pt1,pt2,pt3,pt4
			face.reverse!
			face.pushpull 5
			@group.name = "END PULLEY"
					
		end #of create_geometry()
		
	end #of EndPulley class 
	
end #of module Pmagans

pmagans

I'm not sure if my last post went through. I wanted to thank everyone though. Also I got everything working and kept the two classes seperate for future inheritence. I had to remove the "private" so that the methods for the Conveyor class could be accessed. I'm not really sure why?

module CONVEYOR #CONVEYOR.rb
	# Type in Console
	# load 'Conveyor/CONVEYOR2.rb'
	# ex. conv = CONVEYOR;;Conveyor.new([0,0,0], [0,120,0])
	
	require 'sketchup.rb'
	
	class Conveyor
		#make the @group var and .group()instance
		attr_reader(;group)
		
		#private #why does this need to be private?
		
		def initialize(st_point, end_point)
			ents = Sketchup.active_model.entities
			t1 = Geom;;Transformation.translation [0,0,-5]
			
			@st_point = st_point
			@end_point = end_point
			
			#hold reference to group;
			@group = ents.add_group()
			cpt = @group.entities.add_cpoint(ORIGIN)
			@group.name = "CONVEYOR ASSY"
			@group.transform! t1
			
			self.create_geometry
			cpt.erase!
			
		end #of initialize()
	
		def create_geometry()
			ents = Sketchup.active_model.entities
			puts ents.length
			
			#pulley 1
			st_ep = EndPulley.new(@group, @st_point)
			
			#pulley 2
			end_ep = EndPulley.new(@group, @end_point)
			
			puts ents.length
			
		end #of create_geometry()
	
	end #of Conveyor class
	
	
	
	class EndPulley
			attr_reader(;group)
			
		def initialize(conv_group, ins_pt)
			#TODO; add *args if a group not passed to EndPulley just "create_geometry"
			@conv_group = conv_group
			@ins_pt = ins_pt
			
			self.create_geometry
			
		end #of initialize()
		
		def create_geometry()
			pts = @ins_pt
			width = 36
			length = 18
			
			ents = Sketchup.active_model.entities
			pt1 =[pts[0] - (width/2),pts[1],pts[2]]
			pt2 =[pts[0] - (width/2),pts[1]+length,pts[2]]
			pt3 =[pts[0] + (width/2),pts[1]+length,pts[2]]
			pt4 =[pts[0] + (width/2),pts[1],pts[2]]
	
			@group = @conv_group.entities.add_group()
			face = @group.entities.add_face pt1,pt2,pt3,pt4
			face.reverse!
			face.pushpull 5
			@group.name = "END PULLEY"
					
		end #of create_geometry()
		
	end #of EndPulley class 
	
end #of module CONVEYOR

thomthom

@pmagans said:

I'm not sure if my last post went through.

The first few posts of new members must be approved by a moderator before it appear on the forum - this is an anti-spam measure.

TIG

You still have this
st_ep = EndPulley.new(@group, @st_point)
which won't return the new object [group] unless you add
return @group
as the final code in the EndPulley method...

pmagans

So I added the return @group per your recommendation TIG however I am having some confusion as to how Sketchup sees the newly created groups. It doesn't seem like you can manipulate the returned groups as per the example code below returns undefined method transform!
It seems as though Sketchup is treating the groups st_ep and end_ep as objects not groups. I have been creating "dummy-container groups to bypass this like Conveyor but I'm guessing from your comment there is an easier way to access the groups that I am creating in the EndPulley class?

module CONVEYOR #CONVEYOR.rb
   # Type in Console
   # load 'Conveyor/CONVEYOR2.rb'
   # ex. conv = CONVEYOR;;Conveyor.new([0,0,0], [0,120,0])
   
   require 'sketchup.rb'
   
   class Conveyor
      #make the @group var and .group()instance
      attr_reader(;group)
      
      #private #why does this need to be private?
      
      def initialize(st_point, end_point)
         ents = Sketchup.active_model.entities
         #t1 = Geom;;Transformation.translation [0,0,-5]
         
         @st_point = st_point
         @end_point = end_point
         
         #hold reference to group;
         @group = ents.add_group()
         cpt = @group.entities.add_cpoint(ORIGIN)
         @group.name = "CONVEYOR ASSY"
         #@group.transform! t1
         
         self.create_geometry
         cpt.erase!
         
      end #of initialize()
   
      def create_geometry()
         ents = Sketchup.active_model.entities
         t1 = Geom;;Transformation.translation [0,0,-5]
         #pulley 1
         st_ep = EndPulley.new(@group, @st_point)
         #puts st_ep
         st_ep.transform! t1
         
         #pulley 2
         end_ep = EndPulley.new(@group, @end_point)
         end_ep.transform! t1
         
      end #of create_geometry()
   
   end #of Conveyor class
   
   
   
   class EndPulley
         attr_reader(;group)
         
      def initialize(conv_group, ins_pt)
         #TODO; add *args if a group not passed to EndPulley just "create_geometry"
         @conv_group = conv_group
         @ins_pt = ins_pt
         
         self.create_geometry
         
      end #of initialize()
      
      def create_geometry()
         pts = @ins_pt
         width = 36
         length = 18
         
         ents = Sketchup.active_model.entities
         pt1 =[pts[0] - (width/2),pts[1],pts[2]]
         pt2 =[pts[0] - (width/2),pts[1]+length,pts[2]]
         pt3 =[pts[0] + (width/2),pts[1]+length,pts[2]]
         pt4 =[pts[0] + (width/2),pts[1],pts[2]]
   
         @group = @conv_group.entities.add_group()
         face = @group.entities.add_face pt1,pt2,pt3,pt4
         face.reverse!
         face.pushpull 5
         @group.name = "END PULLEY"
         
         return @group
               
      end #of create_geometry()
      
   end #of EndPulley class 
   
end #of module CONVEYOR

TIG

end_ep = EndPulley.new(@group, @end_point)

NOW ADD

puts 'end_tp details...' puts end_tp puts end_tp.class puts end_tp.name puts 'END'

THEN

end_ep.transform!(t1)

FAIL ? IF end_tp is NOT a group or component_instance ???

Report back what the 'puts' show in the Ruby Console...

pmagans

This is the output - Doesn't get to the puts statements

load 'Conveyor/CONVEYOR2.rb'
true
conv = CONVEYOR;;Conveyor.new([0,0,0], [0,120,0])
end_tp details...
Error; #<NameError; undefined local variable or method `end_tp' for #<CONVEYOR;;Conveyor;0xb8a563c>>
C;/PROGRA~2/Google/GOOGLE~1/Plugins/Conveyor/CONVEYOR2.rb;43
C;/PROGRA~2/Google/GOOGLE~1/Plugins/Conveyor/CONVEYOR2.rb;27;in `initialize'
(eval);435;in `new'
(eval);435

TIG

Try this change: in the EndPulley code after
self.create_geometry
###ADD
return @group

as the last code before the ' `end`' of the `initialize`...

REMOVE the equivalent line from the `create_geometry` method...

Run with the ' puts' to see what's what now...

pmagans

Same message No change - its dying on the puts statements?

Dan Rathbun

WAIT !!

Earlier on I attempted to explain that his custom classes were WRAPPER CLASSES. (And questioned why anyone would want to actually do this. Subsequent edits by a user such as boolean operations can cause the references held by the wrapper class instances to become invalid and point at Sketchup::DeletedEntity objects.)

I showed an example which did NOT have a EndPully class, because it would ALSO be a wrapper class, whose new() constructor returns the wrapper instance NOT a Sketchup::Group instance.

SO.. therefore... he needs to call the EndPully instance's group() wrapper method (created via the attr_reader(:group) call,) which will return the actual group reference:
st_ep.group.transform! t1

TIG

Can you also add the equivalent 'puts' just after the
st_ep = EndPulley.new(@group, @st_point)

puts 'st_tp details...' puts st_tp puts st_tp.class puts st_tp.name puts 'END'

so we can see what the first part does...

Dan Rathbun

Sorry ... I got busy and did not get back to this thread,

I was going to continue the discussion on why wrapper classes are extremely problematic for Sketchup::Drawingelement subclasses. (One issue is on Mac multiple models could be open, but the API does not yet have a good way to track them, and we know of some bugs on the PC, that causes issues.)

Anyway... the alternative you REALLY should be using is to create a Sketchup::ComponentDefinition for your pully and conveyor, and then place instances of these (rather than Groups.)

The definition's instances collection will keep track of them for you.

The model's DefintionList collection will keep track of your definition(s) for each model that they are inserted into.

When a model is opened, your plugin can search through it's DefintionList to find those definitions that are "known" to the plugin. And then grab an array of their instances, and iterate it to get references.

pmagans

Dan you are correct. Adding the .group gave me access to the "group" objects that were created.

As for my thought process I am not sure that it is valid so let me describe my thoughts.

I don't want to code "like" things so I assumed that using classes would allow me to inherit class attributes things without having to copy a bunch of code it multiple places. For example classes would be:

FUNCTIONAL AREAS
[list:11tc2ay1]1. CONVEYOR

CONVEYOR_COMPONENTS
END_PULLEY
DRIVE
INTERMEDIATE_BED
PAN_GUARD
BEARINGS
ETC.
BUILDING_MODSETC.[/*11tc2ay1][/list11tc2ay1]Later I could write Customer specific code for each of the classes and inherit all of the functionality that I wrote in the "General" Classes

One customer's end_pulley may contain different bearings, pulleys, profiles etc. Also there are many types of end pulleys. That being said they do have some similarities especially attribute definitions, layer structure, basic functionality.

Am I on the right track or am I way off the rails?

Dan Rathbun

@TIG

Simply put:

A class constructor returns an instance of IT's class.

CONVEYOR::EndPully.new() returns an instance of CONVEYOR::EndPully not an instance Sketchup::Group

This is one of the MAJOR drawbacks of a wrapper class, you have to write wrapper methods for all the methods of the wrapped object that you wish to access "as if" the wrapper "were" the object itself.

There are some ruby tricks to get a list of only the API methods, and define wrapper methods via an eval loop. But .. it's still can get complicated in other nitty-gritty ways.

I just do not recommend it.

Dan Rathbun

Dynamic Component definitions can give you a lot of flexibility. A style of pully, were the diameter and width are settable via the Component Options dialog.

Your code classes and modules... are geometry creators, but not the actual model objects themselves.

You can also inherit (share) code functionality via mixin module libraries.

Given a mixin module named BasicPully ...

module FancyPully

  include BasicPully

  # now overrride inherited methods if desired

  # now add additional methods if desired

end

.. and later ...

module NiftyPully

  include FancyPully

  # now overrride inherited methods if desired

  # now add additional methods if desired

end

TIG

doh!