sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    Archeology, 3D and photogrammetry?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SketchUp Discussions
    sketchup
    42 Posts 10 Posters 3.7k Views 10 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B Offline
      bjornkn
      last edited by

      Interesting, but it looks like it shares the problems with automated solutions with other such "autoscanner" tools.
      It looks like there is no holes in the mesh, which is surprising.
      There is something strange going on with that trunk and tusks though?
      I would have been very surprised if it managed to make a great, fully detailed/textured model of that sculpture though, without ears, trunk, tusks etc growing into the background, and with no branches/leaves in front, and leaves on the stone (bench?). Even with a lot of photos.
      And what about precision/scale? Is it possible to set any scale/reference measurements?
      Looking forward to see more πŸ˜„

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R Offline
        Roger
        last edited by

        There are 3 levels of detail (mobile device/standard/detailed) The image I showed you was the mobile version. Also more original views help with ambient occlusion and greatly enhances texture detail. I think part of what bothers you is the sculptural technique of molding the tusks to the trunk to make sure physical support is created (IE no thin parts sticking out on their own). If you used multiple radio triggered cameras you could capture a live elephant in quite a bit of detail. As to accuracy of dimensioning I suspect it is quite good where you have hard geometric edges to measure to. Remember, if you import the mesh into SU you will need to scale your object using an actual ground truth measurement manually taken for the actual scene at the time of the photograph. Once you do this all other points in the mesh will scale to the same degree of precision.

        trunk loop
        I call your attention to the void created by the trunk loop and remind you that in the real object the tusks are molded into the trunk for support. The original (real) object is just decoration and not a highly detailed piece of fine sculpture.

        Also once imported as a 3D object into SU and then taken to a render engine, shadow which I was avoiding in the capture would be reintroduced enhancing the sense of depth.

        http://www.azcreative.com

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B Offline
          bjornkn
          last edited by

          Is the trunk "free" from the background, or is there no "hole" behind it?
          It is a bit hard to see on that first photo.
          I guess those are screen dumps, as there are photo textures on it?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R Offline
            Roger
            last edited by

            There is a hole, albeit a small one, behind the trunk.

            http://www.azcreative.com

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B Offline
              bjornkn
              last edited by

              Ah, so that hole is not a hole in the mesh, but an actual hole then?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M Offline
                museummaker
                last edited by

                Related webinar

                http://www.gisuser.com/content/view/26233/2/

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R Offline
                  Roger
                  last edited by

                  Elephant on masonite
                  I trimmed some of the foliage and change the angle so you could see how the trunk reconnects to the wall. If time allows I will do more experiments with metrics tomorrow.

                  http://www.azcreative.com

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B Offline
                    bjornkn
                    last edited by

                    Looks like a relative of Zorro πŸ˜‰
                    Is it the UV mapping that messes up the texturing?
                    Strange trunk/model BTW.
                    Have you also tried other "3D scanners", like http://www.agisoft.ru/products/photoscan/
                    Or Photomodeler Scanner?

                    So far I really prefer the results that can be had from tgi3D Photoscan πŸ˜„
                    I love the way it combines full control with "shrink-wrapping" meshes.

                    Being in the pockets of Autodesk (or should it be said the other way around?) isn't what I want the most πŸ˜‰
                    It is very sad how they have bought most of the 3D competition 😞
                    Good to know that SketchUp is "safe" now;)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • AnssiA Offline
                      Anssi
                      last edited by

                      One example of a virtual tour in an archaeological subject was this Flash movie about Marcus Lucretius's house in Pompeji that was made by Finnish 3D (probably 3D Studio) students in close collaboration with the archaeologists.

                      403 Forbidden

                      favicon

                      (arkisto.metropolia.fi)

                      Anssi

                      securi adversus homines, securi adversus deos rem difficillimam adsecuti sunt, ut illis ne voto quidem opus esset

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • GaieusG Offline
                        Gaieus
                        last edited by

                        About 10 years ago, we made this with 5 other, Roman sirtes. The "interactivity" is only for some of them but there are stunning videos, too.
                        Note that 3D rendering as well as screen resolutions and bandwidth was much slower/smaller than nowadays...

                        i-MSCP internet - Multi Server Control Panel - Error 404

                        favicon

                        (www.h2g2.hu)

                        Gai...

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • B Offline
                          bjornkn
                          last edited by

                          Funny how small everything was in the old days πŸ˜‰
                          Nice design and GUI, but unfortunately none of the popup images/windows worked (I suppose that's where the stunning videos were hiding?)
                          That Finnish site had a nice video, but not so much interactivity. A bit too linear?

                          Here's a couple of my oldies:
                          http://bknilssen.no/video/GolBygg_0000.MOV
                          How to build a stave church - 13 years old, made with trueSpace.
                          It was actually run interactively with IBM software on a site which I think may still be alive today, but hidden/passworded, because it was part of a course in art history at the University of Bergen. The first such online course in this country anyway, at that level. I made a lot of different buildings, art exhibitions etc for them, and had a great time. πŸ˜„
                          http://sapmi.uit.no is newer - only 7 years old. This is the type of VR I think is what is possible today, only in Flash, and much larger, and with a lot more bells and whistles. And then make a very simplified version for those non-Flash users with iOS...
                          I'm currently working on a similar VR exhibition for that University/museum. And that's also the guys/gals who want those 4 archeological mini web exhibitions.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • GaieusG Offline
                            Gaieus
                            last edited by

                            @bjornkn said:

                            unfortunately none of the popup images/windows worked (I suppose that's where the stunning videos were hiding?)

                            Well, they open for me - when I allow popups from that site. Your popub blocker is too efficient. Here is a video of my place:
                            http://www.h2g2.hu/peregrinus/movie/septichora.html
                            but the vidos of the Spanish sites are incredible. Like this one:
                            http://www.h2g2.hu/peregrinus/movie/movie_viewfromthesea.html
                            You can open them into a new tab by middle clicking the links. πŸ˜„
                            (Also old school webdesign putting things into popups...)

                            Gai...

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • B Offline
                              bjornkn
                              last edited by

                              Well, the pop-ups popped up, but there was nothing in the window, except for a small red X.
                              Some other popup windows asked permission to open, and then they opened an overlaid panoramic image at the top left of the screen (no window, just showed on top of the menus and icons etc).

                              I could see those nice videos now though, with the new direct links πŸ˜„
                              Maybe the tour didn't like Opera?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • GaieusG Offline
                                Gaieus
                                last edited by

                                There was probably no Opera when this website was designed! πŸ˜„

                                Gai...

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • B Offline
                                  bjornkn
                                  last edited by

                                  Opera was started in 1994, with the first public version released in 96!
                                  But it still is forgotten every now and then... ;-(
                                  We have to support the locals, you know πŸ˜‰

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • GaieusG Offline
                                    Gaieus
                                    last edited by

                                    I also have Opera. One never knows... πŸ˜’

                                    Gai...

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • R Offline
                                      Roger
                                      last edited by

                                      @bjornkn said:

                                      Looks like a relative of Zorro πŸ˜‰
                                      Is it the UV mapping that messes up the texturing?
                                      Strange trunk/model BTW.
                                      Have you also tried other "3D scanners", like http://www.agisoft.ru/products/photoscan/
                                      Or Photomodeler Scanner?

                                      So far I really prefer the results that can be had from tgi3D Photoscan πŸ˜„
                                      I love the way it combines full control with "shrink-wrapping" meshes.

                                      Being in the pockets of Autodesk (or should it be said the other way around?) isn't what I want the most πŸ˜‰
                                      It is very sad how they have bought most of the 3D competition 😞
                                      Good to know that SketchUp is "safe" now;)

                                      It is an elephant not a fox.
                                      Not sure if I understand what you mean by messed up texturing as more than one rendition has been posted. On the first post there were not enough photo samples from enough angles. This last piece was not the original app, it was the prodeuct of that app exported to SU. The only purose was to show how the trunk looped around and reconnected.
                                      Don't blame me for the quality of the Thai sculpture.
                                      I just tried the AutoDesk tool because the beta is free, but will look into the agisoft

                                      http://www.azcreative.com

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • B Offline
                                        bjornkn
                                        last edited by

                                        @roger said:

                                        It is an elephant not a fox.
                                        Not sure if I understand what you mean by messed up texturing as more than one rendition has been posted. On the first post there were not enough photo samples from enough angles. This last piece was not the original app, it was the prodeuct of that app exported to SU. The only purose was to show how the trunk looped around and reconnected.
                                        Don't blame me for the quality of the Thai sculpture.

                                        Sorry about the confusion. It was the last render, where there were some dark grey bands with a hole it in, which made it look like it was wearing a Zorro mask (or racoon?). I wasn't blaming you for neither the texturing nor the sculpture. SU very easily loses UV mapping and scrambles everything.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • R Offline
                                          Roger
                                          last edited by

                                          Using 123D Catch from autoCAD I was relatively pleased with the elephant which is fairly complex form so I thought I would test a simple case like a box for dimensional accuracy and I ended up with some surrealistic and cubistic, but not rectilinear results. I would love to sit down and wrestle this thing to the ground but I am moving down close to the Mexico border and also have an important photojob to do and need to sell the Phoenix house. When and if things slow down I will give this 123D thing another run.

                                          http://www.azcreative.com

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 3
                                          • 3 / 3
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Buy SketchPlus
                                          Buy SUbD
                                          Buy WrapR
                                          Buy eBook
                                          Buy Modelur
                                          Buy Vertex Tools
                                          Buy SketchCuisine
                                          Buy FormFonts

                                          Advertisement