[Plugin] OBJexporter v3.0 20130131
-
I can confirm this works for any model I tried.
Thank you! Exported OBJ is now topologically correct and thus suitable for a lot more uses. -
Good.
-
Here's v2.9 http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=294844#p294844
Merging of shared vertices is now optional, as it slows down processing for larger models considerably; and it is only required by some more picky mesh-apps, but renderers etc don't seem to mind non-merged vertex data at all. -
Here's v3.0 http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=294844#p294844
It has a much improved shared-vertex merging algorithm that is now slightly faster than a non-merging version, so the option 'not to merge' has been removed because it is now of no benefit.Where possible, shared-vertex data is always reused, ensuring correctly formed geometry.
This can mean that a SKP export containing 100,000 faces and therefore potentially 300,000 vertices can be 'compacted' to use perhaps 50,000 shared-vertices [but of course this depends on each SKP's geometry, grouping etc]: this 'compaction' also reduces processing time [which will now be perhaps ~60 seconds for this sized example], and when combined with the latest optimized 'numerical-entries' gives much smaller OBJ file sizes, and faster processing in 3rd-party apps too. -
Great work, as usual, TIG!! This plugin is very essential for me. Many thanks for your development efforts!
-
Thank you for this update!
-
What simple instructions???? What ever i do i cannot find it HELP!!!!
-
@samurai1789 said:
What simple instructions???? What ever i do i cannot find it HELP!!!!
They are on the download page ! http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=294844#p294844
There are also some simple dialogs as you go after the tool is started...
What problems do you have otherwise ? -
@tig said:
The D.P. accuracy is not now applied to 'whole numbers', and any -0 values becomes 0.
What made you chose to do this? Are there applications that doesn't handle these values well? I'm curious because I've been looking at the OBJ format this weekend.
(Is there an official specification somewhere? I find multiple sources around...) -
See the external links at the end of the page
-
@unknownuser said:
See the external links at the end of the page
Is that the official specs though? "martinreddy.net" ...
-
@thomthom said:
@tig said:
The D.P. accuracy is not now applied to 'whole numbers', and any -0 values becomes 0.
What made you chose to do this? Are there applications that doesn't handle these values well? I'm curious because I've been looking at the OBJ format this weekend.
(Is there an official specification somewhere? I find multiple sources around...)
It just minimizes the OBJ file size, an importer reads 0 as 0.0, so making it 0.000000 is pointless, -0==0 so it might as well be 0 !... so all trailing zeros are now omitted, it speeds up the writing by a few % and I also the importing at the 3rd party end...
There's an OBJ Wavefront Wiki... -
Are you sure all importers manage to read an int instead of a float which the specs appear to indicate? Just wondering in case the parsing is implemented in a stricter language...
@tig said:
I also the importing at the 3rd party end...
Something missing from that sentence?
@tig said:
There's an OBJ Wavefront Wiki...
-
I have used OBJ files exported like this in many apps [Octane, Blender, MeshLab, MeshMan, AC3D etc] and they all import just fine.
As far as I can tell they expect a 'number', so 0 == 0.0 == 0.000000 etc, 1 == 1.0 == 1.000000...
They even take -0 == 0 when -0 is not really a number.
I also trap for 'NaN' and 'Infinity' which would break them...
Sharing vertex data is also permissible if you correctly reference the vertices.Try it yourself using a box that is located at, and offset from, the ORIGIN by whole 'meter' distances. The native OBJ exporter using m/triangulation, flipped-YZ etc gives a similar result to my 'free' tool BUT 1.000000 >> 1 in mine... Now import the two OBJ files into an app like Blender and you get the exact same result... If you make the two much more complex you'll find mine loads into the app a tiny % faster. Of course it takes longer to write the file because the native exporter is a swifter exe...
-
There are no way to define faces with holes in OBJ, is it?
I see that OBJ files can support bezier patches - which is interesting for Bezier Surface.
-
I'm getting a crash during export, albeit its a large file, the obj gets up to about 5mb and sketchup crashes without warning.
I'm aware this would be highly scene dependant but is there anything I can do? I'd be happy to send in a scene somewhere for debug.
-
Firstly thanks for such a great plugin. I think it's a big rough that google want us to go all the way to 500 bucks for an obj export, something that could be considered pretty standard, and clearly exporting means that they may not even need all sketchup pros power as the model will be used elsewhere. I'd would love to see a slightly less expensive option, cos I ain't going to 5 without a good reason.
Having said that... I don't want to seem like someone whining about a freebie for sure, I think what you done is great..... but I can't get an export that works.
The model goes some way and then crashes- bugsplat . I can open the obj...sure.. but only half of it comes in.
Is your plugin still compatible?
If I can get results I will definitely donate.
-
As I have no way of knowing what it is you are trying to do then I don't have the feintest idea what's up.
My exported OBJ files have proved to be compatible with all of the standard apps that can import such files.
Have you tried exporting a simple box and seeing if that works...Bugsplats during the export are very rare, if the SKP is large with complex geometry etc it can take a while to complete; so don't confuse a white-out with a 'crash'!
When Sketchup is doing intensive calculations it sometimes looses its screen focus and says it's 'unresponsive'.
However, it is still beavering away in the background writing the OBJ data etc.
Leave it alone until it's completed its tasks.
If you run it with the Ruby Console open do you get any error messages ?If you still have issues and it's not just your impatience that's aborting things... then can you post [or PM] a sample of a SKP that is failing, so I can look at it...
For example do you have anything peculiar about your SKP files?
Like very small geometry, or very large geometry, edges and no faces, oddly grouped geometry, oddly layered faces/edges etc etc... ??? -
@chuckasaki said:
... google want us to go all the way to 500 bucks for an obj export
It's not google anymore
-
Thank You, Thank You, Thank You! Been going nuts trying to find something to do this and this is PERFECT. Have a great day!
Advertisement