Marvins_dad's Gallery

[Bryan K]

Top notch!

[tuna1957]

Good to see you back. Excellent work as always

[Mike Amos]

Your usual stamdard, a proper job and nice to see.

[marvins_dad]

We finally opened the building at the end of March!

[Rich O Brien]

Lovely! Can't wait for the invite and the free bar!

[marvins_dad]

@Rich-O-Brien Thanks Rich! LOL - they had a free "Taco Bar" at the ribbon cutting, does that count?

[marvins_dad]

We also opened Celina Police - from the project I posted images of before the Fort Worth Project...

[marvins_dad]

This post is deleted!

[marvins_dad]

This post is deleted!

[marvins_dad]

A look at the clerestory...

[Rich O Brien]

What a nice place to get a mugshot!

I saw your other vray query. I recently did some stuff for a glass shade company and it brought up a somewhat related issue.

It was something I never considered before. But when you stack dielectrics of differing IOR values you should use relative IOR values. Not sure how Vray calculates IORs but I presume out of the box it is absolute IOR values.

But for pure physical correctness the light passing through a glass pane then a film would be a stacked dielectric. So the IOR value for the film would need to be corrected to give a truly accurate result.

Or you could just bodge it.

[marvins_dad]

I think I ended up bodging it. LOL - I finally got a response on the Enscape forum that helped me create what I needed within Enscape. I had Sun Shadows raytracing turned off. Didn't know that was a switch I could turn on and off. It kept me from having to learn Vray for another project at least!
I stacked a window glazing system with a transmittance of 51% with a plane that had 20% transmittance to see if there was a change. With sun raytracing on, it worked!

[Bryan K]

Excellent work!