Camera Rays wanted
-
Without seeing all of the code... you need to set @ip=nil before it's set by the picking - then you should not get the error messages.
I can see nothing wrong with the way you are setting the vector.
Try adding some extra code toentities.add_cpoint(camera.eye)
andentities.add_cpoint(@ip.position)
so you can check these are getting taken properly.
Are you setting the 'camera' and then moving the view point to pick @ip ? You need to get the camera immediately after you click on @ip, otherwise you'll get an old camera.eye being used ?? -
Add a little validation of the vector to ensure it's not of zero length.
def onLButtonUp(flags, x, y, view); vector = view.camera.eye.vector_to(@ip.position) Sketchup.active_model.active_entities.add_cline(view.camera.eye, vector) if vector.valid? end
-
I was getting that same error August. And I am not sure why, hopefully one of their suggestions will fix it. I have little to no experience with conctruction geometry (apart from construction points I guess).
Chris
-
@tig said:
... you need to set @ip=nil before it's set by the picking ... You need to get the camera immediately after you click on @ip, otherwise you'll get an old camera.eye being used ??
Ah Ha! That explains why sometimes I seem to only get one line. It must be using the old @ip and therefor I'm getting the same line constructed with each click, no matter where it is. In this scenario, I seem to get one line with each re-invocation of the tool.
Separately, but similarly, the visible line that does not go through the current camera eye, must be using the older camera eye.
Definitely some issues to explore.
All my links to Ruby reference sources are stuck on my dead computer and I had not begun to use them enough to have them in my head. Can someone point me to where @ip is well described?
Thanks,
August -
The 'line tool' example rb script is perhaps as good as any to start with - you should have that already...
-
@chris fullmer said:
... I have little to no experience with conctruction geometry ...
Pick my jaw off the floor! Given how much of your code, Chris, I use in contructing my own geometry, to use a totally geeky metaphor , that strikes me like Yoda saying he's not very good with a light saber. Sorry.
-
@tig said:
The 'line tool' example rb script is perhaps as good as any to start with - you should have that already...
Thanks. Your suggestion about validating the vector should be useful too. I'll have it kick off a msgbox.
Forgive me if my attention to this is sporadic. I do appreciate all the help.
August
-
As an aside, it occured to me that this thread is an example of the meaning of my signature quote from Dickens. Thanks again to everyone. I'm very encouraged that this will come together quickly from here.
-
@august said:
...All my links to Ruby reference sources are stuck on my dead computer and I had not begun to use them enough to have them in my head. Can someone point me to where @ip is well described?
Thanks TIG,
There are definitely more examples of @ip and @xxxx in the Google-supplied examples. But they didn't help. Your previous suggestion about setting @ip=nil has not helped (so far), at least with the things that I've been wrestling with, and I think I may have a clue why.
Major Ruby Thinking Glitch
I think I've found a major conceptual glitch in my understanding SketchUp Ruby "under the hood" -- and maybe this will help others, at least newbies, too. The following outlines my Ruby learning process to get there. Later I'll try to post full examples for testing to demonstrate what I think is really going on and why the results have seemed to make no sense and the suggested fixes have not worked.
I finally figured out that I was asking the wrong question. I don't need to understand "
@ip
" as much as I first need to understand "@
".After some hours of digging (both of my Ruby books are missing somewhere in "the disaster that once was my home office" but I finally found a good online reference), I have learned that
@ip
is an instance variable.I had originally been trying to follow Chris' usage:
@ip = view.inputpoint(x,y);
That line is used in the working snippet that Chris posted earlier in this thread that defines the "
clf_auguat_lines
" class.I've been assuming that
@ip
would hold an inputpoint.The SketchUp Ruby API doc says that view.inputpoint(x,y) returns
nil
, but clearlynil
is not assigned to the@ip
variable or the script would not do anything.The other OO languages I'm most familiar with, FrameMaker FrameScript and Acrobat JavaScript, allow a method to return an instance of a class and that can be assigned to a variable. Their doc would have said "Returns point object" instead of "Returns nil".
Also, somewhere along the way I got the mistaken idea that Ruby had typeless variables. I guess I assumed that because you don't declare variables. But Ruby has implicit declarations based on the first letter of the variable name and value assigments happen very differently depending on the type of variable being assigned.
I have been assuming that @ip is an inputpoint object created by:
@ip = view.inputpoint(x,y);
From that assumption, I've been further assuming that @ip.position would return a Point3D object.
But it appears that it doesn't, at least not exactly. I had been reading the code as if it would create the Point3D object as soon as
@ip.position
was executed, but instead it appears to hold off evaluating it until the last possible moment. It appears to not create a Point3D at all "if it doesn't have to".The code:
eye = view.camera.eye; Sketchup.active_model.active_entities.add_line(eye,@ip.position);
will, embedded in Chris' snippet, draws a
line
wherever you click. But the code:eye = view.camera.eye; vector = eye.vector_to(@ip.position); Sketchup.active_model.active_entities.add_cline(eye,vector);
will only draw a
cline
if you click on a place that is a valid reference for acline
. Anywhere else, you get an error about a zero-length vector.That has been totally confusing me until the idea of postponed evaluation occurred to me.
What it says to me is that SketcnUp Ruby is not creating a
vector
object by using "eye
" as one Point3D and@ip.position
as a second Point3D. It does not create the second Point3D right away (I'm guessing).Instead, the
vector
is not actually evaluated until theadd_cline
is being executed, and because it'sadd_cline
and notadd_line
, if the@ip.position
is not valid for acline
, you get an error about an invalid vector.I'm stretching here, so I'm hoping someone who knows this much better than I do can follow my logic and tell me if I'm on track or missing the point.
Am I making sense? Is there a better way to make sense out of this?
Thanks,
August -
This is driving me crazy and now I've spent nearly another full day on it. Arrgh!
I can draw Camera Ray
line
s just fine. But notcline
s unless there is an object to reference.I can get one, single unreferenced
cline
. Once acline
fails to get an input point because of a lack of a reference object, I cannot get another valid@ip
for aline
, only forcline
s that have reference objects. Doesn't matter if I reload the file, I have to restart SU to clear this state.I thought I could draw the line first, and then use its endpoints to create the vector (that works) and the
cline
(that doesn't work).To demonstrate, I have two files. The only difference between them is that in the first one, some code is commented out: the single line of code that creates a
cline
from a point and a vector and some following messages to report on it.Both versions create a
vector
from the originalline
and that appears to work fine.Here's the version that creates plain old ordinary edge lines. I call it
rayL.txt
:class Clf_august_lines; def onMouseMove(flags, x, y, view); @ip = view.inputpoint(x,y); view.invalidate; end; def onLButtonUp(flags, x, y, view); line1 = Sketchup.active_model.active_entities\ .add_line(view.camera.eye, @ip.position); if (line1) UI.messagebox "line1 SUCCESS\n view.camera.eye = " + view.camera.eye.to_s + "\n @ip.position = " + @ip.position.to_s else else UI.messagebox "line1 Failure\n view.camera.eye = " + view.camera.eye.to_s + "\n @ip.position = " + @ip.position.to_s end vector1 = line1.start.position\ .vector_to(line1.end.position); if (vector1) UI.messagebox "vector 1 = " + vector1.to_s else UI.messagebox "vector1 Failure" end #cline1 = Sketchup.active_model.active_entities\ #.add_cline(line1.start.position, vector1); # if (cline1) # UI.messagebox "cline1 = " + cline1.to_s # line1.erase! # else # UI.messagebox "cline1 Failure" # end end; def draw(view); @ip.draw view; end; end; Sketchup.active_model.select_tool\ (Clf_august_lines.new)
And here's the version that creates a
line
, then uses that line's endpoints to create avector
, which works in both versions, and then creates acline
from one endpoint of the line and the vector. It is thiscline
which initiates the problem.I call this one
rayLC.txt
because it attempts to create aline
and then acline
:class Clf_august_lines; def onMouseMove(flags, x, y, view); @ip = view.inputpoint(x,y); view.invalidate; end; def onLButtonUp(flags, x, y, view); line1 = Sketchup.active_model.active_entities\ .add_line(view.camera.eye, @ip.position); if (line1) UI.messagebox "line1 SUCCESS\n view.camera.eye = " + view.camera.eye.to_s + "\n @ip.position = " + @ip.position.to_s else UI.messagebox "line1 Failure!\n view.camera.eye = " + view.camera.eye.to_s + "\n @ip.position = " + @ip.position.to_s end vector1 = line1.start.position\ .vector_to(line1.end.position); if (vector1) UI.messagebox "vector 1 = " + vector1.to_s else UI.messagebox "vector1 Failure" end cline1 = Sketchup.active_model.active_entities\ .add_cline(line1.start.position, vector1); if (cline1) UI.messagebox "cline1 = " + cline1.to_s # line1.erase! else UI.messagebox "cline1 Failure" end end; def draw(view); @ip.draw view; end; end; Sketchup.active_model.select_tool\ (Clf_august_lines.new)
If I open a new SU drawing and
load 'rayL.txt'
, it will draw lines whereever I click. But unless there is an object for them to reference, they stop at the bounding planes of the near quadrant.If I then either
load 'rayLC.txt'
or open a new SU file and load it, I can drawcline
s that reference existing objects, e.g.,Sang
, and there is no problem.But when I attempt to draw a
cline
that does not reference an existing object, I can create just that one, singlecline
and then all subsequent attmpts to createcline
s will fail because @ip.position is stuck at thecamera.eye
position orline1.start.position
.Even if I
load rayL.txt
again to create just lines, they fail, referencing Sang, the origin, or whatever. After onecline
,@ip.position
is stuck oncamera.eye
.I have tried TIG's suggestion of inserting @ip = nil but everywhere I have tried it produces error messages.
This doesn't seem like it should be this hard.
I have been poring over the SketchUp Ruby doc about
view
andinputpoint
etc. and unfortunatley it all seems written for those who already get it. It also says things like theinputpoint
should "normally" be obtained using [ruby:11qtfq9b]pick[/ruby:11qtfq9b], but I've followed those examples and not even gotten a working start. At least this one based on Chris Fullmer's version works sometimes.It appears to be one of three things:
- It really is this hard.
- I'm overlooking something very basic.
- There is a bug in creating
cline
s from a point and a vector.
Can someone help me figure out which it is, and/or possibly suggest a workaround?
Thanks,
August -
There is something wrong going on here and I'm not sure if its something in the script or an SU bug. But after the cline is created, focus is not given back to the mouse correctly. You will notice that it is no longer drawing the inference dots after the first line is drawn correctly. That shows me that somehow the on_Mouse_move is not being called after the mouse button is clicked. But once you orbit, then it all gets reset.
I'm looking it over right now, but so far I am not seeing any obvious error.
Chris
PS somehow I never got intot he habit of using contrsution geometry. I always just use regular lines to act as guides
-
Well, I don't know why that is broken and I got tired of looking at it so I took a new approach. I just used the pickray method to make the point and vector. It is much simpler and seems to be working great. So try this little code.
class Clf_august_lines def onMouseMove(flags, x, y, view) @ip = view.inputpoint(x,y) view.invalidate end def onLButtonUp(flags, x, y, view) Sketchup.active_model.active_entities.add_cpoint(view.camera.eye) ray = Sketchup.active_model.active_view.pickray(x,y) Sketchup.active_model.active_entities.add_cline(ray.to_a[0], ray.to_a[1]) end def draw(view) @ip.draw view end end Sketchup.active_model.select_tool(Clf_august_lines.new)
Oh and I erased out all the semi-colons. They look messy to me. I only put them in the original code so I could condense it all to one line to run from the console. But since you are not doing it that way, I didn't feel there was a need to keep them around. Feel free to put them back if you miss them though
Chris
-
@chris fullmer said:
There is something wrong going on here and I'm not sure if its something in the script or an SU bug. ...
Thanks for that confirmation.
It's worse than you had so-far discovered.
After the tool fails, if you activate the Select tool, it will not select. If you activate the Line tool, it will not draw. After a bunch of tool changes and attempts, I got function back, I presume because one tool or another did a better job of resetting things.
It's a bug.
I will try your new approach.
I had tried my own "new approach" by taking
linetool.rb
and hacking out the two-point construction to get just one point. I also didn't try calculating avector
, I just drew thecline
betweenview.camera.eye
and@ip1
and gave it a name,newRay
, then setnewRay.end = nil
.But the core construction method of my new version is still the same and it has the same problem as the old version. I'm convinced it's a bug.
Thanks again,
August -
@chris fullmer said:
... I got tired of looking at it so I took a new approach. ...
Thanks. I tried it; it works great. No bugs.
However, like the earlier versions, it creates an infinite
cline
in both directions, not a true ray that starts at a point and goes infinitely in one direction. That's not a problem, just a curiosity. (If it's not "supposed" to be that way, it may be related to the bug -- just guessing.)Do you know why the
cpoint
atview.camera.eye
is necessary? You don't appear to use the point. Is it a requirement forpickray
to work? (Maybe the omission of acpoint
there is the source of the bug? More guessing.)Thanks again.
-
The cpoint is not needed for the code. I just like to put it there so I can see exactly where the camera was.
As for the bug, I know that 7.1 added some sort of infinite line viewing bug. I thought it had been fixed, but maybe not? Or maybe we've uncovered another iteration of their bug. I noticed that clines are not clipping like they should. They do not appear to clip at the near clipping plane. i'm not sure if it has always worked that way. I really hate construction geometry, so I haven't used it enough to know how it used to behave compared to how it currently behaves.
But the part where you said that it still produces an infinite line instead of a ray, I think that is a known bug. I'll see if I can track down the info on that bug if you'd like.
Chris
-
@chris fullmer said:
... But the part where you said that it still produces an infinite line instead of a ray, I think that is a known bug. I'll see if I can track down the info on that bug if you'd like.
Thanks, but no need. It doesn't interfere with anything that I'm trying to do. I'm just curious.
You have already been most helpful, and you've helped me get my feet wet in SketchUp Ruby again (after they'd dried out for nearly a year).
And now that I've started wrestling with this, I've begun to appreciate your dislike/aversion for construction geometry. Modifying something that already exists is clearly much easier.
Thanks again,
August -
@august said:
[... if you activate the Select tool, it will not select. If you activate the Line tool, it will not draw. ...
This bug is still there. Just to make it stranger, it seems to go away if you orbit, but if you return to the exact viewpoint, using either Previous View or a Scene, it appears to be stuck again.
For example, with the Rectangle Tool active, the first InputPoint appears to be stuck at the Camera Eye. The second InputPoint will not go just anywhere, it appears to have to inference an object, just like when drawing a CLine. If you orbit away with Rectangle active, you can see that the first point is already set. If you press Escape, you can draw a normal rectangle, but if you return to the exact Eye view, that point is pre-picked again.
Similarly for the Line tool. The first point is already picked and the only allowable lines are the ones that terminate on a pre-existing point.
Clearly a bug.
-
August, are you saying the that the bug is still present in the most recent snippet I posted?
Chris
-
@chris fullmer said:
August, are you saying the that the bug is still present in the most recent snippet I posted?
Yes, the above image was generated using your newest snippet, unchanged.
I load your snippet, saved as a separate
.txt
file, make a few clicks that generate the desiredcline
s, and then when I select the rectangle tool, as described above, the first rectangle inputpoint seems locked tocamera.eye
and the second point will, in this drawing, only reference one of Sang's points.I can orbit, draw a normal rectangle, and when I return to the original view, using Previous View or my Scene, the first inputpoint is locked at
camera.eye
again and the second inputpoint will not reference anything except Sang.I am getting the lines I want, and I can work around that input point locking, but I do think this is a bug in SketchUp, probably in
.add_cline
, maybe inview
. -
I am starting to think it has to do with the way I am making an inputpoint with
view.inputpoint(x,y )
. I think I might need to look that over a little closer. I think I am messing something up with the IP associated to that view. I don't really undestand how IP points work behind the scenes, but I have a feeling the way I am calling it is messing things up. Might be a bug, or could just be un-intended usage of an input point. This is something I would like to understand better, so I'll try to figure it out this weekend (I have been excited about a few ruby projects lately, so I am spending some time on ruby again, it is fun!)Chris
Advertisement