RDoc question
-
The missing paragraphs in Darkfish might just be due to it's CSS style. With the original RDoc they where there.
But it would not recognize various directives, couldn't find my README file.
The original seemed bugged, as in when you rebuilt it'd rebuild just the changed files, but you'd lose the existing in your index.
The exeprience is that it's abig mess.While YARD just worked. Based on RDoc syntax, but with @tags.
-
@thomthom said:
While YARD just worked. Based on RDoc syntax, but with @tags.
I'll have to bookmark that then. maybe it should go on the Sticky Links page?
-
Maybe. Could be worth to test it first? I've only looked briefly on it, but over the weekend I hope to get time to document my TT_Lib library with it. Then I can say if I recommend it.
But I do like the sound of the @tags it has available. Appear to leave more control than plain RDoc. Such as parameter types and return types and version numbering. -
@thomthom said:
But I do like the sound of the @tags it has available. Appear to leave more control than plain RDoc. Such as parameter types and return types and version numbering.
It's sounding better all the time!
Keep us advised.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
Advertisement