sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    โ„น๏ธ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    A little Problem...

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Corner Bar
    59 Posts 15 Posters 967 Views 15 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E Offline
      Ecuadorian
      last edited by

      Yup. Most people start to do strange calculations with that one.

      -Miguel Lescano
      Subscribe to my house plans YouTube channel! (30K+ subs)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • X Offline
        xrok1
        last edited by

        7.5/1.5=5

        โ€œThere are three classes of people: those who see. Those who see when they are shown. Those who do not see.โ€

        http://www.Twilightrender.com try it!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R Offline
          remus
          last edited by

          Well done people, its not a trick question: 2 is the correct answer as ecuadorian said (and the scales are the 1st type you posted jeff.)

          edit: doh, put 3 instead of 2. Corrected.

          http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Alan FraserA Offline
            Alan Fraser
            last edited by

            I'd have said $10.50, Miguel. You said 7 rabbits and a half...that's 7 whole rabbits plus a half rabbit. Given, that in Ecuador, you apparently sell rabbits in the odd amount of 1.5 rabbits, you'd need to buy 7 portions of them to get 7 whole rabbits...then have a whole lot of half-rabbits left over.
            I always was something of a pedant. ๐Ÿ˜„

            3D Figures
            Were you required to walk 500 miles? Were you advised to walk 500 more?
            You could be entitled to compensation. Call the Pro Claimers now!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • GaieusG Offline
              Gaieus
              last edited by

              I agree with Eric - go and see a doctor, Remus. And when you've done so, also a psychiatrist (since who cares which ball weighs slightly more or less?)
              ๐Ÿ˜’

              Gai...

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R Offline
                remus
                last edited by

                Who cares! what do you mean who cares?! we're addressing fundamental problems in comparative ball analysis and scalar logic ๐Ÿ˜„

                http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • E Offline
                  Ecuadorian
                  last edited by

                  ๐Ÿ˜†
                  Another one:

                  I have two jars full of a liquid amoebas eat. These amoebas multiply by 2 every three minutes. Jar A starts with two amoebas and after two hours it's full of them. Jar B starts with just one. How much time will it take it to fill?

                  -Miguel Lescano
                  Subscribe to my house plans YouTube channel! (30K+ subs)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • R Offline
                    remus
                    last edited by

                    2 hours 3 minutes, assuming the jars are the same size.

                    reasoning: after 3 minutes it will have multiplied, so you'll have 2 amoebas and be left with the same starting conditions you had in jar A.

                    http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E Offline
                      Ecuadorian
                      last edited by

                      ๐Ÿ‘
                      Anyone has another one?

                      -Miguel Lescano
                      Subscribe to my house plans YouTube channel! (30K+ subs)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • AnssiA Offline
                        Anssi
                        last edited by

                        @remus said:

                        Well done people, its not a trick question: 3 is the correct answer as ecuadorian said (and the scales are the 1st type you posted jeff.)

                        No, Remus, two weighings is enough, when you start with the 3+3 method I think Jeff posted first:

                        First weighing: You select randomly 3+3 balls and weigh them. The next step depends on your result.

                        Second weighing: If the 6 balls were of equal weight you weigh the 2 balls left, the heavier is one of them. Otherwise, you choose randomly 2 balls out of the heavier set of 3 and weigh them. If they are equal, the heavy one is the one left out.

                        In real life, figuring this out would probably take more time than to weigh the balls in three steps ๐Ÿ˜„
                        Anssi

                        securi adversus homines, securi adversus deos rem difficillimam adsecuti sunt, ut illis ne voto quidem opus esset

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • pilouP Offline
                          pilou
                          last edited by

                          About the first problem with this and 12 same aspect objects (one is different weight)

                          http://www.goacom.com/images/scales.jpg

                          You must say what is the different object and if it's less or more weight than the current!
                          In how many minimum weigh-in can you made that? ๐Ÿ˜‰

                          Whithout see result on the Net of course! ๐Ÿ’š

                          Frenchy Pilou
                          Is beautiful that please without concept!
                          My Little site :)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • jeff hammondJ Offline
                            jeff hammond
                            last edited by

                            pilou

                            that would take 3 weighings

                            6 vs 6 then
                            3 vs 3 then
                            1 vs 1

                            [or 5vs5, 2 vs 2, 1 vs 1 leaving the possibility that you might find it in 2 tries if the 5 vs 5 results are the same]

                            could also do:
                            4vs4
                            2vs2
                            1vs1
                            which still needs 3 weighings

                            dotdotdot

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • jeff hammondJ Offline
                              jeff hammond
                              last edited by

                              @xrok1 said:

                              7.5/1.5=5

                              while that is true, it's not the proper answer to the rabbit question.

                              a different way to think about that one is to first ignore the total amount of rabbits and figure out the cost first:

                              a rabbit and a half costs a dollar and a half therefore one rabbit costs one dollar.. so 7.5 rabbits costs $7.5

                              dotdotdot

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • daleD Offline
                                dale
                                last edited by

                                OK now if you model and render the eight balls and seven rabbits, the price of the rabbits will go up,(because thats going to take a while, and time is money) and the weight of the balls will vary based on the visual weight they are allotted, now things are different! (oh render engine of your choice by the way ๐Ÿ˜„ )

                                Just monkeying around....like Monsanto

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • pilouP Offline
                                  pilou
                                  last edited by

                                  @ Jeff
                                  Number's 3 answer is good but explanation seems lack of precision and sybilline for external visitor ๐Ÿ˜„
                                  What about object number 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12? ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
                                  Does is it less or more heavy or current? ๐Ÿ˜‰

                                  Frenchy Pilou
                                  Is beautiful that please without concept!
                                  My Little site :)

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • jeff hammondJ Offline
                                    jeff hammond
                                    last edited by

                                    @unknownuser said:

                                    @ Jeff
                                    Number's 3 answer is good but explanation seems lack of precision and sybilline for external visitor ๐Ÿ˜„
                                    What about object number 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12? ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
                                    Does is it less or more heavy or current? ๐Ÿ˜‰

                                    haha..
                                    i'm definitely not the best at explaining myself.. if i tried to explain using object numbers, it would get a lot more confusing i think ๐Ÿ˜„

                                    but here goes an example.. let's say the heavier object is #9

                                    place objects 1-6 on one side then objects 7-12 on the other.. 7-12 will weigh more so that eliminates objects 1-6

                                    place 7,8, & 9 on one side then 10, 11, & 12 on the other.. 7-9 will weigh more so that eliminates 10-12..

                                    place 7 on one side and 8 on the other... they weigh the same so that means 9 is the oddball.

                                    [EDIT] and then as Anssi said, in real life, you know you're going to test #9 against some of the other objects so the real world answer is at least 4 if not more ๐Ÿ˜„

                                    dotdotdot

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • jeff hammondJ Offline
                                      jeff hammond
                                      last edited by

                                      @unknownuser said:

                                      You can't say first 9 is heavy!

                                      ha
                                      well i did that for sake of explanation..

                                      regardless, i can figure out the answer in about 5 seconds but i could sit here all day long trying to explain how ๐Ÿ˜„
                                      it's a fault of mine..

                                      dotdotdot

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • pilouP Offline
                                        pilou
                                        last edited by

                                        @ Jeff : yes but...no ๐Ÿ’š

                                        You can't say first 9 is heavy!

                                        You must make first all combinaisons and then say for this combinaison 9 is heavy !
                                        So draw first all the tree !

                                        Here your proposition ๐Ÿ˜„


                                        Jeff.jpg

                                        Frenchy Pilou
                                        Is beautiful that please without concept!
                                        My Little site :)

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • pilouP Offline
                                          pilou
                                          last edited by

                                          ๐Ÿ˜„
                                          If i take you 11 oranges and one false your explanation don't work ๐Ÿ˜†
                                          Only with a 1/24 hasard ๐Ÿ˜†

                                          Frenchy Pilou
                                          Is beautiful that please without concept!
                                          My Little site :)

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • jeff hammondJ Offline
                                            jeff hammond
                                            last edited by

                                            really? the way i see it, you can always find the the heavy one in 3 tries.. you mind showing the 1 out of 24 when it wouldn't work?

                                            further, using a different starting technique using 12 objects (5vs5), it's possible to find the oddball in 2 tries.. sometimes (17% chance of doing it 2)

                                            let's say the heavier object is #11..

                                            place 1,2,3,4,5 on one side and 6,7,8,9,10 on the other.. they weigh the same so that eliminates 1-10

                                            place #11 on one side and #12 on the other..

                                            11 weighs more so you've found it in 2 weighings.

                                            dotdotdot

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 1 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Buy SketchPlus
                                            Buy SUbD
                                            Buy WrapR
                                            Buy eBook
                                            Buy Modelur
                                            Buy Vertex Tools
                                            Buy SketchCuisine
                                            Buy FormFonts

                                            Advertisement