"I'm ready to lose control, but they're not"
-
whiny voice
Is that proof still coming, Tommie?
-
In the case of a global catastophe, the last thing on any survivor's mind would be burying the dead...especially using nice, tidy plastic coffins or liners. They'd be far more concerned with not joining the ranks of the dead themselves.
Ask anyone who has ever been in a situation of having to handle huge numbers of corpses...you don't use coffins; you use excavators. -
@alan fraser said:
In the case of a global catastophe, the last thing on any survivor's mind would be burying the dead...
It is exactly what Red Elk mentions. Those who survived would rather change places with those who has left this World. In case of deaths from hunger or thirst in high temperatures it is better to seal bodies well. Isn't it?
@unknownuser said:
Is that proof still coming, Tommie?
Nope, Stinkin'. You have received already all info required on which I have based my opinion. Two mentioned films are the most important.
-
@unknownuser said:
@unknownuser said:
Is that proof still coming, Tommie?
Nope, Stinkin'. You have received already all info required on which I have based my opinion. Two mentioned films are the most important.
Films. Those bold statements of yours are based on ... films.
Quod erat demonstrandum.
Edit: I just have to know. What stopped you from concluding the WTC was destroyed by Godzilla? Mind you, this is very much a serious question.
-
I'm not supporting Tomasz, but you guys keep asking for evidence, and there may be none or very few, you don't ask a cop for evidence why he had a hunch following a succesful bust, or ask evidence for god, or ask for evidence why you love that girl, you may not know why, or you can't explain it in words, sometimes it's just a hunch or a leap of faith.
Granted that these examples don't compare to the questions why 911 is an inside job, but they show that people believe in stuff or feel stuff with much less evidence and questions than the ones 911 puts forth.
I say if Tomasz can't provide proof or valid arguments, but he still believes in what he believes then it's his choice, he's not obligated to provide any. -
@alan fraser said:
Those who doubt the news reports are required to provide evidence...
Alan, those two films are documents containing the news reports, the authors analyse them.
-
Marian wrote:
@unknownuser said:
I say if Tomasz can't provide proof or valid arguments, but he still believes in what he believes
Hmmm, sound fimiliar??
They call that religion.
-
@solo said:
Marian wrote:
@unknownuser said:
I say if Tomasz can't provide proof or valid arguments, but he still believes in what he believes
Hmmm, sound fimiliar??
They call that religion.
Yes Solo that's towards where i was aiming discreetly, i mean what proof can you ask for the existnece of GOD, people are free to believe in anything they want, it's they're right, even if those things are not enough for you, it's enough for them.
-
True - but they shouldn't imply their beliefs are based on fact by insisting they posess proof. Bad form, that.
-
Tomasz, that's nonesense. If you are talking about a situation in which the majority of people die, the survivors are not going to be bothering themselves about burying all those bodies in hermetically sealed canisters simply to avoid disease. By far the simplest choice is to simply move to where there aren't any bodies...like out of the cities and into the countryside or onto the coast...where you actually stand a chance of finding something to eat.
In any case, the whole concept of a polarity shift (if that's what you are talking about) causing a wordwide cataclysm is, itself, total nonsense and very bad science. The geological records show that it happens fairly regularly and has almost certainly happened thousands of times before with no evidence of any kind of mass extinction. It's also far more likely to happen perhaps 2000 years from now than a mere 3. A magnetic polarity shift is an extreme inconvenience in this digital age, not a catastrophe. It wouldn't even affect most electronics; it switches extremely slowly...from months to millenia. It's not an electromagnetic pulse; and there's absolutely no reason why it would have any noticeable effect on the weather.
Back to the 9/11 question: Stinkie is absolutely right. Those who doubt the news reports are required to provide evidence...and much better evidence than some movie plot. Otherwise the rest of us have no more reason to doubt what has been reported than we do last Saturday's football results...or maybe they're a conspiracy too; designed to make millions for some gambling syndicate?
-
again i think it is a matter of whether you have any doubt about the official saying, or you do not.
On the side of the official saying it is all said.
On the side of the un_official saying it is still cooking.
If you doubt the proofs and evidences of the official saying you are required to prove it.
Ok.
Fair enough.
only thing is that it should not be taken as an attack to usa democracy the people who investigates now.In any case, we will probably never get to know what really happened. So may be the question is unprofitable.
Maybe the question should be, how is it that those towers were vanished because of the hate of the people who hates USA ?
Has USA done anything to them to be hated so greatly ? -
-
My point is ...
I have no point.Elisei
PS:Media always made things worse(edited)!!!!!
PPS:
@unknownuser said:Has USA done anything to them to be hated so greatly ?
Had Nagasaki and Hiroshima done anything to be hated so greatly?
-
isn t that wurst ? -
In German, yeah. Not in Dutch.
-
@unknownuser said:
@ely862me said:
PS:Media always made thinks worst!!!!!
Mmm ... worst.
Granted ... worst pun ever.
Thanks stinkie...I just spit coffee all over my screen. Damn good one, that was.
-
@ely862me said:
Had Nagasaki and Hiroshima done anything to be hated so greatly?
That's bad comparison.
It was a declared war against a nation, not a nebulous group that can hide amongst an otherwise innocent civilian population. It was also believed at the time that the cost of invading the Japanese homeland with troops would have caused more casualties than the use of the bomb. Unfortunately, the use of the bomb caused awful casualties, and all of them on the Japanese side.
I dislike armchair quarterbacking this decision because none of us were alive at the time to understand what was happening, and none of us were present or are privy to the analysis of the information that led to the decision to use the bomb. The bomb is a terrible weapon, but when it was believed that every man, woman and child on the Japanese homeland would be willing to sacrifice themselves to kill an Allied soldier - what was to be done? With the hatred of the atomic bomb and the knowledge of its terrible effects today, it might be easier to think an invasion might not be such a bad idea; but that's a decision made with the luxury of hindsight.
Atomic bombs during declared war between two nations does not equal suicide bombs or aircraft hijackings against an unsuspecting nation.
-
i am sorry i derivated the thread
funny how we people discuss about things taking irredentorial positions while maybe we are at the start of world war iii
-
When some US soldiers came to have some trainings in Romania ..i ve said UPS now the terrorists are going to put the target on us
(i was worry because the americans comes to our country )
Somehow the US manage to do damage by trying to make order.I don t know ..
When the terrorists blow up the towers ..one of my classmates said: They(US) believed to much they re center of the Earth . I give him right a bit(faar away to agree with terrorists).
Wherever a trouble comes ...hops US...something happens hops US.
I may be wrong..or not..i m not a politician maybe i should shut,but we ve free opinion ..
And i still don t forget that US in the 2nd War let us on the hand of USSR.
.Our future it would have been lot more different.Anyway this is just my opinion.
-
ely862me,
Americans are saddened by the role our government takes sometimes in World affairs and the recent arrogance in foreign policy.
It is very unfortunate what happened to Eastern Europe, but going back to 50 years ago, are you forgetting the American lives that were lost on European soil to stop the Nazi's? It was a bad mistake to let your country go. Perhaps the leaders then did not see how much the USSR would grab or think they could beat Russia (who ever has?), but the alternative could have been another massive war, with your country being the battleground.
You say "I may be wrong..or not..i m not a politician maybe i should shut,but we ve free opinion .." Yes, you have a free opinion and should speak freely. Where do you think that idea came from? The United States that once meant freedom to other nations, is the one I think we all hope will manifest itself in years to come.
And to be clear: We can argue, but you have a RIGHT to say what you feel. (Some governments don't know this yet. I just saw a Romanian film about Romania in the 80's and it looked like very tough living.)
Advertisement