Why vote Obama?
-
Ron, seeing as Stinkie, has gone into 'bleep' mode
Is
there any chance you could edit your to 'bleep' also
I feel like an old fart doing this job sometimes, but keep me
happy, pleaseOn second thoughts, sort it out yourselves, I'm getting confused
now
-
May I suggest F@K* instead?
-
Bellwells wrote:
@unknownuser said:
Or Pete's lie about Palin's report card?
Stop being such a righteous F*@K, it does not become you ... see your very partisan postings (while denying being partisan) you come off as a poster-boy for the extreme right republicans, at least I admit my bias.
-
@bellwells said:
...I, got pissed at Tom for posting the video which flat out lied about McCain at the Senate hearing?...
Ron, I apologized for making that post once I realized it was a fake (though you never apologized for calling me a liar...among so many other inaccurate/insulting characterizations). Continuing to bring it up says volumes about the kind of person you are and about your real intentions in these discussions. I am quite disappointed I ever gave your comments the credence worthy my replies.
EDIT: (Maybe you could post a new pic of yourself to stave off future confusion...you know, one taken after you shaved your head :`)
-
-
-
Touchy? No, Ron. I merely consider it a moral duty to tell anyone who spreads crypto fascist propaganda to go F@K* themselves. Without asterisks, too.
Got that?
-
@unknownuser said:
Touchy? No, Ron. I merely consider it a moral duty to tell anyone who spreads crypto fascist propaganda to go "bleep" themselves. Without asterisks, too.
Got that?
Like when I, and ONLY I, got pissed at Tom for posting the video which flat out lied about McCain at the Senate hearing? Or Pete's lie about Palin's report card?
EDIT: If we're both on course for seeking truth, that's fine.
-
@tomsdesk said:
@bellwells said:
...I, got pissed at Tom for posting the video which flat out lied about McCain at the Senate hearing?...
Ron, I apologized for making that post once I realized it was a fake (though you never apologized for calling me a liar...among so many other inaccurate/insulting characterizations). Continuing to bring it up says volumes about the kind of person you are and about your real intentions in these discussions. I am quite disappointed I ever gave your comments the credence worthy my replies.
EDIT: (Maybe you could post a new pic of yourself to stave off future confusion...you know, one taken after you shaved your head :`)
Why the hell would I apologize to you for being a liar? I gave you credit for apologizing about that post. The fact remains you were eager to post that crap and if I hadn't pointed the lie out, you would not have apologized. Now THAT speaks volumes. I could care less about receiving any credence from you. In fact, I specifically don't want it.
-
@solo said:
Bellwells wrote:
@unknownuser said:
Or Pete's lie about Palin's report card?
Stop being such a righteous F*@K, it does not become you ... see your very partisan postings (while denying being partisan) you come off as a poster-boy for the extreme right republicans, at least I admit my bias.
Now on to you. I have NEVER posted a lie like your report card, nor have I ever hidden my conservative bent. You two are starting to come off as arrogant liberals. Tom more so.
-
When I first posted it I never realised it was a fake, and when you directed me to a site that showed it to be a fake I decided to leave it up as removing it would have left a void in the discussion. I know you removed your racist image, but not by choice, I left mine by choice.
-
There are 3 things I have learned never to discuss with other people. . .
Religion, Politics and the Great Pumpkin.
Linus Van Pelt
-
@solo said:
When I first posted it I never realised it was a fake, and when you directed me to a site that showed it to be a fake I decided to leave it up as removing it would have left a void in the discussion. I know you removed your racist image, but not by choice, I left mine by choice.
OK, understood.
-
A new study from UCLA shows that FDR's policies, rather than ending the Great Depression, actually prolonged it by 7 years.
As the US slides towards a depression that ultimately has some of its roots in Dem social policies, do we really want the House, Senate, and White House going to Dems who intend to implement FDR-type government programs?
Tighten your belts, everyone.
And related to the CRA, I laughed through the tears to hear Barney Frank spew about "reform" and more regulation - this coming from the idiot who for the last 5 years blocked reform of Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac, while claiming there were no problems with them. The only thing he could do to help the situation is resign.
Even Bill Clinton blamed Frank and other Congressional Dems for the problem. The Democratic Congress has an approval rating half that of President Bush, and we want to elect more Dems? Insanity.
-
Not long to go now untill we can all start being nice to each other again
-
@baker518 said:
@unknownuser said:
@baker518 said:
I edited the post that has caused the blood pressure problem with some of you, now go back to arguing with each other, rather than about me. I don't want to offend anyone and be banned, oh my.
Could you possibly F@K* off regardless?
I really don't understand what I said to provoke such a response. I'm glad to know that I'm not one of those people that think others should be banned for a post (until now). Regarding your language, it must be contagious and you have set a bad example that others think its OK to follow suit, regardless of position or title. I really shouldn't be surprised, considering this is a political discussion and tempers flare when we are passionate about the way we feel.
@baker518 said:
I really don't understand what I said to provoke such a response.
What can I say? You must be exeptionally dumb. There's really no other explanation. I feel sorry for ya. Want some stuff to play with, perhaps? Ball of yarn? Glue and paper? Stahlhelm? Swastika?
-
Relax, nobody is being banned. This is the corner bar a place to rant.
grow a chin.
-
@unknownuser said:
@baker518 said:
I edited the post that has caused the blood pressure problem with some of you, now go back to arguing with each other, rather than about me. I don't want to offend anyone and be banned, oh my.
Could you possibly F@K* off regardless?
I really don't understand what I said to provoke such a response. I'm glad to know that I'm not one of those people that think others should be banned for a post (until now). Regarding your implied language, it must be contagious and you have set a bad example that others think its OK to follow suit, regardless of position or title. I really shouldn't be surprised, considering this is a political discussion and tempers flare when we are passionate about the way we feel.
-
All I did was to submit a post that I read, and like many do, shared it with others. Sometimes if you share things you read with others, they can shed light on it and you see it for what it really is. You didn't offer any kind of explanation or interpretation, you just went off the deep end with it.
You didn't have to read it, but you did. If you feel violated by something you read, then maybe you shouldn't let your curiosity get the best of you and read things posted on the internet. It sounds to me that you may have an anger management issue.
By the way, what country are you from?
-
@baker518 said:
It sounds to me that you may have an anger management issue.
Right - how 'bout you don't lay off of the haloperidol? If you post links to neo fascist sites, you're bound to reap upset responses. You know that - a kid would. Don't go all 'oooh, I didn't see that coming' on me now. That's the coward's approach, isn't it?
Advertisement