sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • 登入
    Oops, your profile's looking a bit empty! To help us tailor your experience, please fill in key details like your SketchUp version, skill level, operating system, and more. Update and save your info on your profile page today!
    🔌 Smart Spline | Fluid way to handle splines for furniture design and complex structures. Download

    Is there a free plugin like smustards subdivide and smooth?

    已排程 已置頂 已鎖定 已移動 Developers' Forum
    32 貼文 9 Posters 3.8k 瀏覽 9 Watching
    正在載入更多貼文
    • 從舊到新
    • 從新到舊
    • 最多點贊
    回覆
    • 在新貼文中回覆
    登入後回覆
    此主題已被刪除。只有擁有主題管理權限的使用者可以查看。
    • pilouP 離線
      pilou
      最後由 編輯

      @ Remus for that: But as I have not the plug I can't test 😉
      So works with free and pro?


      smustard.jpg

      Frenchy Pilou
      Is beautiful that please without concept!
      My Little site :)

      1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
      • R 離線
        remus
        最後由 編輯

        Going by that description, it should work with free and pro, although it doesnt look like it works with version 5 and below.

        http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

        1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
        • GaieusG 離線
          Gaieus
          最後由 編輯

          @ Tekkybot: what you get now is a group which you cannot subdivide further UNLESS you explode it.

          @ Pilou: since the pro and free versions are practically the same now, I see no reason why it wouldn;t work in the free version.

          Gai...

          1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
          • Chris FullmerC 離線
            Chris Fullmer
            最後由 編輯

            Does SU Free support encrypted Rubies? I think it didn't used to. So that was how sometimes SU free would not support a ruby that Pro did. I don't remember if the free version switched to now work with encrypted rubies.

            Chris

            Lately you've been tan, suspicious for the winter.
            All my Plugins I've written

            1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
            • GaieusG 離線
              Gaieus
              最後由 編輯

              In the office I use the free version and have never had any problems with rubies since v6. In v5 the two versions were indeed different.

              Gai...

              1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
              • StinkieS 離線
                Stinkie
                最後由 編輯

                The Maxwell plugin won't work with the free version - so there must be a difference.

                1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                • GaieusG 離線
                  Gaieus
                  最後由 編輯

                  Well, it probably utilizes one of the exporters only the pro version has.
                  But again, mine is just an opinion...😄

                  Gai...

                  1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                  • D 離線
                    den
                    最後由 編輯

                    @tekkybot said:

                    @remus said:

                    Once youve put the files in your plugins folder, you just select the geometry you want to subd and smooth then go tools->catmull clark subdivision.

                    what i did is, 1 put the plugins in my plugins folder, 2 create a box, and pull it up into a 3d cube, 3 select all, then go to tools, and catmull clark, when i do this, these three little dots appear, very small dots, but nothing else happens?

                    yeah this happened to me but what i did was select the box and erase and found the subdivision was inside the box!! i guess the three dots were the points of the subdivision poking thru.
                    hope this helps.

                    1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                    • M 離線
                      matteo
                      最後由 編輯

                      honestly, I like all the features of the subdivision and smooth ruby, except the fact that it multiplies the poly count by exponential factor.

                      Apart some easy models, this kills sketchup.

                      I prefer to create a simple shape in sketchup and edit it further with Wings 3D. It's more than a plugin, it's a real subdivision modeler, with a lot of features and handles very well hi-poly objects. It has a decent uv-mapping tool too, to edit your textures.

                      After you've finished with it, you can always re-export your model to sketchup and render it with your favourite style, or render it with almost any renderer you want.

                      If you want to give it a try, here the link: http://www.wings3d.com/

                      /matteo

                      hire me: http://www.nonsolo3d.it/ !

                      1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                      • pilouP 離線
                        pilou
                        最後由 編輯

                        In what format reimport your file from Wings3D ❓
                        Seems only 3DS can be possible 😒
                        But this format has some limitation (65 535 limits by facts polys...)

                        Frenchy Pilou
                        Is beautiful that please without concept!
                        My Little site :)

                        1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                        • M 離線
                          matteo
                          最後由 編輯

                          @unknownuser said:

                          In what format reimport your file from Wings3D ❓
                          Seems only 3DS can be possible 😒
                          But this format has some limitation (65 535 limits by facts polys...)

                          yes, 3ds format keeps well the textures too. Sometimes I succeeded to import an obj file, with the apposite ruby: it allows you to keep square coplanar faces, instead triangular ones. But it is still a buggy plugin.

                          For me 65 535 polys are more than enough to be handled by sketchup. I prefer not to exceed 1/4 of that limit to keep my workflow fluid and smooth, and even keep working on my laptop. Or share it with other people.
                          But this depends on the goal you pursue. I prefer to have a small load and run faster and believe that a good texture + 4 poly is better than a bad texture + 100 polys: there is a sort of beauty in keeping the poly count as low as you can.

                          /matteo

                          hire me: http://www.nonsolo3d.it/ !

                          1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                          • pilouP 離線
                            pilou
                            最後由 編輯

                            @unknownuser said:

                            there is a sort of beauty in keeping the poly count as low as you can

                            Of course : small is beautiful ☀

                            Frenchy Pilou
                            Is beautiful that please without concept!
                            My Little site :)

                            1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                            • 1
                            • 2
                            • 2 / 2
                            • 第一個貼文
                              最後的貼文
                            Buy SketchPlus
                            Buy SUbD
                            Buy WrapR
                            Buy eBook
                            Buy Modelur
                            Buy Vertex Tools
                            Buy SketchCuisine
                            Buy FormFonts

                            Advertisement