sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    Is there a free plugin like smustards subdivide and smooth?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Developers' Forum
    32 Posts 9 Posters 3.2k Views 9 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • pilouP Offline
      pilou
      last edited by

      @ Remus for that: But as I have not the plug I can't test 😉
      So works with free and pro?


      smustard.jpg

      Frenchy Pilou
      Is beautiful that please without concept!
      My Little site :)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R Offline
        remus
        last edited by

        Going by that description, it should work with free and pro, although it doesnt look like it works with version 5 and below.

        http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • GaieusG Offline
          Gaieus
          last edited by

          @ Tekkybot: what you get now is a group which you cannot subdivide further UNLESS you explode it.

          @ Pilou: since the pro and free versions are practically the same now, I see no reason why it wouldn;t work in the free version.

          Gai...

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Chris FullmerC Offline
            Chris Fullmer
            last edited by

            Does SU Free support encrypted Rubies? I think it didn't used to. So that was how sometimes SU free would not support a ruby that Pro did. I don't remember if the free version switched to now work with encrypted rubies.

            Chris

            Lately you've been tan, suspicious for the winter.
            All my Plugins I've written

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • GaieusG Offline
              Gaieus
              last edited by

              In the office I use the free version and have never had any problems with rubies since v6. In v5 the two versions were indeed different.

              Gai...

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • StinkieS Offline
                Stinkie
                last edited by

                The Maxwell plugin won't work with the free version - so there must be a difference.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • GaieusG Offline
                  Gaieus
                  last edited by

                  Well, it probably utilizes one of the exporters only the pro version has.
                  But again, mine is just an opinion...😄

                  Gai...

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D Offline
                    den
                    last edited by

                    @tekkybot said:

                    @remus said:

                    Once youve put the files in your plugins folder, you just select the geometry you want to subd and smooth then go tools->catmull clark subdivision.

                    what i did is, 1 put the plugins in my plugins folder, 2 create a box, and pull it up into a 3d cube, 3 select all, then go to tools, and catmull clark, when i do this, these three little dots appear, very small dots, but nothing else happens?

                    yeah this happened to me but what i did was select the box and erase and found the subdivision was inside the box!! i guess the three dots were the points of the subdivision poking thru.
                    hope this helps.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M Offline
                      matteo
                      last edited by

                      honestly, I like all the features of the subdivision and smooth ruby, except the fact that it multiplies the poly count by exponential factor.

                      Apart some easy models, this kills sketchup.

                      I prefer to create a simple shape in sketchup and edit it further with Wings 3D. It's more than a plugin, it's a real subdivision modeler, with a lot of features and handles very well hi-poly objects. It has a decent uv-mapping tool too, to edit your textures.

                      After you've finished with it, you can always re-export your model to sketchup and render it with your favourite style, or render it with almost any renderer you want.

                      If you want to give it a try, here the link: http://www.wings3d.com/

                      /matteo

                      hire me: http://www.nonsolo3d.it/ !

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • pilouP Offline
                        pilou
                        last edited by

                        In what format reimport your file from Wings3D ❓
                        Seems only 3DS can be possible 😒
                        But this format has some limitation (65 535 limits by facts polys...)

                        Frenchy Pilou
                        Is beautiful that please without concept!
                        My Little site :)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M Offline
                          matteo
                          last edited by

                          @unknownuser said:

                          In what format reimport your file from Wings3D ❓
                          Seems only 3DS can be possible 😒
                          But this format has some limitation (65 535 limits by facts polys...)

                          yes, 3ds format keeps well the textures too. Sometimes I succeeded to import an obj file, with the apposite ruby: it allows you to keep square coplanar faces, instead triangular ones. But it is still a buggy plugin.

                          For me 65 535 polys are more than enough to be handled by sketchup. I prefer not to exceed 1/4 of that limit to keep my workflow fluid and smooth, and even keep working on my laptop. Or share it with other people.
                          But this depends on the goal you pursue. I prefer to have a small load and run faster and believe that a good texture + 4 poly is better than a bad texture + 100 polys: there is a sort of beauty in keeping the poly count as low as you can.

                          /matteo

                          hire me: http://www.nonsolo3d.it/ !

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • pilouP Offline
                            pilou
                            last edited by

                            @unknownuser said:

                            there is a sort of beauty in keeping the poly count as low as you can

                            Of course : small is beautiful ☀

                            Frenchy Pilou
                            Is beautiful that please without concept!
                            My Little site :)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • 1
                            • 2
                            • 2 / 2
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Buy SketchPlus
                            Buy SUbD
                            Buy WrapR
                            Buy eBook
                            Buy Modelur
                            Buy Vertex Tools
                            Buy SketchCuisine
                            Buy FormFonts

                            Advertisement