IPhone and Open GL
-
@unknownuser said:
You don't have to be on wi-fi to pick up email or surf the net on an iphone, it works anywhere.
I don't think you can really expect the iphone to take massive parts of the market in such a short period. Nokia and Blackberry have been operating in this sector for years and have far more experience.The iPhone will fulfill my requirements and imo looks far slicker than anything else around at the moment.
again couldn't agree more.
i had a blackberry, and found that i never fully utilised all of it's functions, then i got my xda, and it is near enough perfect bar the fact i have to use a stylus, the new iphone seems like perfect middle ground to me.
plus women will like you if you get one.
ha ha
pav
-
Remus, no it won't. That's why I bought a BlackBerry. Apple isn't a patch on RIM for business users.
For £30/month I get effectively unlimited voice, texting, surfing, Gmail and email from absolutely anywhere...even with no WiFi or O2 signal. The BB even came free on that tariff. BlackBerries can also communicate directly with one another via their PIN numbers via the Blackberry Network, without incurring any voice minutes at all.
That's why I'm waiting to upgrade to the BB Thunder in September.
The fact that the new BBs can voice over WiFi makes apps like Skype totally redundant on a smartphone. -
Just to be clear im talking about the iphone 2 here. And im positive it can do everythin you mentioned in your previous post (except gtalk, although i didnt know what it was untill i looke dit up 5 mins ago, my fault.)
-
In my opinion the iPhone is the StechUp of the mobile phone world. I've had other smartphones and the iPhone has been the best by far (never had a BB). I find it so much a joy to use that I don't really care about 2.0. I do most of my emailing on it and in fact this post as well. Its not just pretty it's super fun to use, I have no complaints.
As for GPS I wouldn't mind having it, but I can do what I need with the "current location" tech. I never print out any directions ever. I'd rather not have a seperate GPS anyway.
-
Remus, yes, I realise you're referring to iPhone V2, but I doubt very much that it can do it cheaper....or that it's anything like as good at emailing It doesn't have Push email for a start. It might have soon...at extra cost...via Mobile Me, but that is some way off yet. Right now a BB can do this built-in.
The new iPhone still can't send multimedia messages, voice dial, take video, cut and paste or Bluetooth to anything other than its own headphones...some of the reasons I didn't buy the original. By contrast, the BB connection to other devices is as simple as it is superb.Personally, I don't see it as an either/or. I think the next few years will see the rise of the smartphone at the expense of the ordinary mobile/cellphone. And I think that both RIM and Apple are both set to expand massively, with other companies falling by the wayside. Motorola has already crashed and burnt in this sector and it wouldn't surprise me if the market leader, Nokia, was about to take a massive hit despite its excellent products (and cheapness vs Apple).
I know Apple makes a big deal of its popularity and coolness, but the plain fact is that in the last quarter more BBs were sold to the "consumer" sector alone (disregarding RIM's massive corporate user base) than the total number of all iPhone sales in the same period...and that's in spite of all the hype surrounding anything Apple-scented.
They are both excellent systems, in their different ways, that will keep getting more excellent. It's just that the BB is better suited to what I require in terms of telecoms. Basically, iPhones are getting a little more BlackBerry-like, with improved business enterprise features; at the same time Blackberries are becoming more populist with all the usual bells and whistles. At some point they are likely to become virtually indistinguishable...but right now BlackBerry is the only system that will allow me to chill-out beside some pool in the Greek Islands yet still allow me to email and surf...even allow me to approve models onto the FormFonts site... without racking-up any extras at all to my comparatively modest monthly billing plan.
Back to the original point, I'd still rather run even a sawn-off version of SU on a device that was both larger than a smartphone and that wasn't subject to all the vagaries of the telecom service, or on a device that one felt compelled to upgrade every 18 moths or so.
-
I recently bought an iPod Touch, which is dimensionally similar to the iPhone. I can access the internet on it, but the screen is so small, I find it useless. So I cannot see using SU on a device that small. Just think of the toolbars alone - they'd be itty-bitty, or you'd have to keep opening and closing them.
-
Alan, you didnt mention any of those features (in the same detail) in your original post (to which i was refering.) But as you wisely said, back on topic!
Daniel, i too have an ipod touch, although i dont find browsing the internet too bad. Similarly i reckon viewing SU models would proabbly be ok as well, although as you said i tihnk a fully fledged model-altering version would have to have a brilliant UI (that didnt leave any buttons on screen), otherewise it would be unworkable. So being realistic, i dont think its too much to ask for a skp viewer.
-
From our mouths to some programmers ears.....
-
and hopefuly not out the programer's other ear.
as i mentioned before, i devised a way to view SU models on the iphone/ ipod touch (not an "iTouch", i hate it when people call it that). using one finger on the screen to orbit, two fingers moving together to pan and a pinching motion to zoom. simple, right? -
Simple idea indeed. Like you said, the basic commands would be orbit, pan and zoom. Any visible touch-commands would just take up valuable screen real estate.
I wonder if the accelerometer feature could be used for orbit and zoom. Turn left/right to orbit left/right and tilt forward/back to zoom in/out. The problem with this would be controlling the amount of movement to achieve the desired effect. Using your fingers, as you suggest, might allow for a greater degree of control.
-
and use double tab either
- for "fit screen" or
- for showing up some menue buttons.
which one is better?
oh, and moving your finger out of the frame (like sliding to the next image at a picture show) to switch between scenes! great...
-
no, i think it would still count that as orbiting. maybe tap onve to bring up prev/next controls, no editing menus.
253
Advertisement