ProgeCAD Smart - Autocad alternative
-
ProgeCAD - The real autocad
alternative
I dont know why people waste money on costly CAD Software's when they can get the same results with ProgeCAD .
Anybody who is familiar with AutoCAD can immediately use progeCAD without any training because the layout, commands, toolbars are almost same.
For architects, engineers, interior designers, builders & developers.
Visit http://progecad.in to know more and download progecad for free http://progecad.in -
There is an other free alternative for AutoCad, named QCAD. This software comes with Ubuntu and is free-ware, it saves the drawings in *.dxf format A-CAD 2000 or R12.
@unknownuser said:
I dont know why people waste money on costly CAD Software's when they can get the same results with ProgeCAD .
The reason why people buy an expensive license is the ability of creating your own tools. In AutoCad you can write in LISP since it came on the market and most of your old tools will still work in the latest versions of A-CAD. It is even possible to create tools in Visual Basic and Visual C++.
When Iworked as a CAD drawer and used A-CAD I wrote many LISP tools that saved loads of time, read also money. With intelligent tools you can automate anything, this stops you from doing the same over and over again and makes your live as a drawer a lot easier.
An A_CAD license is not that expensive at all for a company if it is a powerful tool.
-
@unknownuser said:
@unknownuser said:
I dont know why people waste money on costly CAD Software's when they can get the same results with ProgeCAD .
The reason why people buy an expensive license is the ability of creating your own tools. In AutoCad you can write in LISP since it came on the market and most of your old tools will still work in the latest versions of A-CAD. It is even possible to create tools in Visual Basic and Visual C++.
Hop on over to http://www.icadsales.com and download a copy of progeCAD and demo it for 30 days. It has AutoLISP, it has ADS (SDS C++), now, it doesn't have ARX, yet, but really, how many companies create custom objects anyway? If you can get the same software for 1/10th the price would you continue to buy the more expensive brand? In some cases the answer is yes, there are those who simply have to have Gucci, my wife for one, but I secretly buy her the knockoff and she is none the wiser,
. -
ProgeCAD Smart says that it is only for non-commercial personal use. What is the definition of "personal use" ? Is it to use it to draw out ones own house? Or to use it for playing on CAD? Or is it for learning purposes only? In what way a person will find "personal use" for a CAD software? I am really curious to know about this.
Thanks in advance
With best regards
PRSS -
Personal use is usually meant as 'non commercial use', so as long as you arent producing deliverables for people with it youre okay. Probably varies slightly from company to company, though, so worth waiting for the official answer.
-
@remus said:
Personal use is usually meant as 'non commercial use', so as long as you arent producing deliverables for people with it youre okay. Probably varies slightly from company to company, though, so worth waiting for the official answer.
I can not give you the "official answer" as we are not the developers but from the progeCAD website there is a pretty good statement that should be clear enough...
** Private use Only: progeCAD 2008 Smart! is for private, non-commercial use only. The use of progeCAD 2008 Smart! within any organization or for commercial and business purposes is strictly prohibited.
If you plan a business/commercial usage, please take a look to our Professional products or download the Trial Version*
To me that means that if you sell your stuff and you used progeCAD Smart! to help create it, your in violation of the agreement...
FYI to all, while the 2009 free Smart! version is not available yet, progeSOFT has just released the 2009 professional version of progeCAD Professional. 30 day trials available at http://www.icadsales.com/index.pl/Download%20IntelliCAD
-
In the end, that means you can only use it as a student or to learn the software....
Which is exactly the same as a 'student/education version' or a 'trial version' of the other CAD programs.
The only difference would be that your trial doesn't expire.Semantics.
I like Google sketchups approach better. You can use the free version for professionl use.
That is probably the reason it is so popular and used in almost every architecture firm in the world. -
@kwistenbiebel said:
In the end, that means you can only use it as a student or to learn the software....
Which is exactly the same as a 'student/education version' or a 'trial version' of the other CAD programs.
The only difference would be that your trial doesn't expire.Semantics.
I like Google sketchups approach better. You can use the free version for professionl use.
That is probably the reason it is so popular and used in almost every architecture firm in the world."the reason it is so popular and used in almost every architecture firm in the world" might also have something to do with the fact it is owned by the largest Internet firm on the planet and just the simple act of putting the name Google on the product generates more press buzz than progeSOFT could muster in a thousand years.
Now, if Google would associate sketchup with a charity and encourage users to donate just think what they might accomplish with their marketing juggernaut.
The main thrust behind progeCAD Smart! and before that progeCAD LT has always been that it is charityware. Utilize the software for free and donate to a worthy cause if you choose to. The brand awareness is a great benefit of that idea. As a trial though, Smart! is pretty crippled compared to the Professional version of progeCAD.
If everything in life were free, motivation and innovation would be priceless
-
Why would one donate an amount of charity money if you can't use the software in your job? I would buy the Pro product instead.
It would only make sense to donate when you can actually use it professionally.You are probably right that Sketchup benefits of being a product of a well known firm.
But I still think that architecture firms will start to use it, because the free version is err....free and allowed to be used in the job.
If it would not been the case, arch firms wouldn't be attracted to purchasing the Pro version .
By giving away the free basic version, you actually promote the commercial version as the platform becomes widespread. A standard.I think it is common practice in Arch firms to have the free Sketchup installed on a lot (if not all) computers, while the Pro licenses are limited to a small group of sketchup power users.
The name Progecad, by the way, is quite well known (I know it for years).... If the smart version would be free for professional use, I think it could be picked up the same way Sketchup has and be more successful than it is now.
Google isn't earning too much money by promoting the Pro version (my guess), but will be earning money indirectly, through Google Earth/Maps (sponsored links, adsense etc...) and also by future sponsored 3D warehouse links (who knows).
That is the future of software imo. Money being earned indirectly....not through the software itself, but with all that surrounds it.
People that think 'open source' is charity work, are wrong.
There is money being made in the 'open source' world.
Just look at Linux. It is free to use as an OS ....but there is a hugh commercial potential in developing derived products like licensed OS for smartphones etc....It is about having a creative business model.
The reason why Autodesk products are that expensive is because a high percentage of users is using the illegal downloaded versions.
The legal users have to make up for what is lost by those illegal users.
That is the old fashioned business model. -
I was away from my city for quite a while and could not see the forum posts. Hence my delay in replying.
I perfectly agree with kwistenbiebel. SketchUP is so popular because you can use the free version for commercial use also. If one continually uses it for professional purposes his conscience makes him buy it!
I also agree that ProjeCAD is only a trial version without expiry! Other than that I can't figure out any non-commercial and personal use!
With best regards
PRSS -
@amit raoot said:
I dont know why people waste money on costly CAD Software's when they can get the same results with *****CAD .
Anybody who is familiar with ****CAD can immediately use *****CAD without any training because the layout, commands, toolbars are almost same.
For architects, engineers, interior designers, builders & developers.(links removed, and post edited)
I know this thread is old, and I apologise for acting like a moderator, when I am not, but it really makes me annoyed when hard nosed salespeople use viral marketing techniques such as the method highlighted above. It's so easy to spot, once you know the technique. Some bloke comes in with the 'hard sell', then some 'other' (usually the same person), posing with a another's name- but almost always, just one post- ie, their first post to the forum (and with the same IP address too I may add!). This is spam of the ugliest order because it is so dishonest, and as a result, I won't be touching this PCAD software with a barge pole. Shame.
As for the rest of the thread, I agree that cracked software is wrong- simply because, imho, cracking software allows the heavies to remain as the market leaders, because all those who have (illegal) copies, will be those very copies that are considered the industry standard. But I disagree with the statement about Autodesk charging so much because of illegal copies been made, as I think we are going back to the same philosophy behind Apple versus HP or Mercedes verses Ford. Autodesk charges so much for ACAD because they believe it's worth that much (technologies, R&D etc). Ridiculous really, especially for essentially what is a 2D vector application, with a bit of ACIS thrown in for a slice of the 3D experience. I'm rather pleased that Autodesk never bought Atlast software, as it may now cost thousands. It may also have ceased to exist, with the technology turning up in ACAD, Revit and Inventor (which, actually, it already has (licenced?)), in the latter two titles!
Advertisement